Chromosome diversity and evolution in Liliaceae

Annals of Botany

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 459-475

  Peruzzi, L ^a   Leitch, I J ^b   Caparelli, K F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

C value; Chromosomes; Genome size; Karyotype asymmetry; Karyotype evolution; Liliaceae; Liliales; Polyploidy

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DATA SET; DNA; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENOME; KARYOLOGY; KARYOTYPE; MONOCOTYLEDON; MORPHOMETRY; PHYLOGENETICS; POLYPLOIDY; TREND ANALYSIS;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; KARYOTYPING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; POLYPLOIDY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMILACACEAE;

CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; HAPLOIDY; KARYOTYPING; LILIACEAE; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMILACACEAE;

FRITILLARIA (ANGIOSPERM); LILIACEAE; LILIALES; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 58849141204     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn230     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
2. Arano H. 1963. Cytological studies in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan. IX. The karyotype analysis and phylogenetic considerations on Pertya and Ainsliaea. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) 76: 32-39.
3. Beal JM. 1939. Cytological studies in relation to the classification of the genus Calochortus. Botanical Gazette 100: 528-547.
4. Bennett MD. 1970. Natural variation in nuclear characters of meristems in Vicia faba. Chromosoma 29: 317-335.
5. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005a. Genome size evolution in plants. In: Gregory TR ed. The evolution of the genome. San Diego: Elsevier, 89-162.
6. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005b. Plant DNA C-values database (release 4.0, October 2005). http://www.kew.org/genomesize/homepage
7. Bennett MD, Rees H. 1967. Natural and induced changes in chromosome size and mass in meristems. Nature 215: 93-94.
8. Bennett MD, Rees H. 1969. Induced and developmental variation in chromosomes of meristematic cells. Chromosoma 27: 226-244.
9. Brandham PE, Doherty MJ. 1998. Genome size variation in the Aloaceae, an angiosperm family displaying karyotypic orthoselection. Annals of Botany 82: 67-73.
10. Caputo P, Frediani M, Venora G, Ravalli C, Ambrosio M, Cremonini R. 2006. Nuclear DNA contents, rDNAs, and karyotype evolution in subgenus Vicia: III. The heterogeneous section Hypechusa. Protoplasma 228: 167-177.
11. Cave MS. 1970. Chromosomes of the California Liliaceae. University of California Publications in Botany 57: 1-58.
12. Ceccarelli M, Minelli S, Maggini F, Cionini PG. 1995. Genome size variation in Vicia faba. Heredity 74: 180-187.
13. Cerbah MJ, Coulaud J, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1998a. rDNA organization and evolutionary relationships in the genus Hypochaeris (Asteraceae). Journal of Heredity 89: 312-318.
14. Cerbah MJ, Souza-Chies T, Joubier MF, Lejeune B, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1998b. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Hypochaeris using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear rDNA: inference for chromosomal evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 345-354.
15. Chase MW, Duvall MR, Hillis HG, et al. 1995. Molecular phylogenetics of Lilianae. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries C eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 109-137.
16. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, et al. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In:Wilson KL, Morrison DA eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. Melbourne: CSIRO, 3-16.
17. Cox AV, Abdelnour GJ, Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 1998. Genome size and karyotype evolution in the slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae: Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 681-687.
18. Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons: structure, evolution and taxonomy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Darlington CD. 1973. Chromosome botany and the origins of cultivated plants. London: George Allen & Urwin.
20. Darlington CD, Wylie AP. 1955. Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
21. Das AB, Mohanty S, Marrs RH, Das P. 1999. Somatic chromosome number and karyotype diversity in fifteen species of Mammillaria of the family Cactaceae. Cytobios 97: 141-151.
22. De Azkue D, Martinez A. 1988. DNA content and chromosome evolution in the shrubby Oxalis. Genome 30: 52-57.
23. De Melo Nationiel F, Guerra M, Benko-Iseppon AM, De Menezes NL. 1997. Cytogenetics and cytotaxonomy of Velloziaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 257-273.
24. D'Ovidio R, Marchi P. 1990. DNA content, karyotype structure analysis and karyotype symmetry in Ranunculus L. (Ranunculaceae). Italian species belonging to sections Flammula (Webb) Benson and Micranthus (Ovcz.) Nyarady. Caryologia 43: 99-115.
25. Fay MF, Chase MW. 2000. Modern concepts of Liliaceae, with a focus on the relationships of Fritillaria. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 17: 146-149.
26. Fay MF, Chase MW, Rønsted N, et al. 2006. Phylogenetics of Liliales: summarized evidence from combined analyses of five plastid and one mitochondrial loci. In: Columbus JT, Friar EA, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG eds. Monocots:comparative biology and evolution (excluding Poales). Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 559-565.
27. Fedorov A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Leningrad: Nauka Publishers.
28. Frediani M, Caputo P, Venora G, Ravalli C, Ambrosio M, Cremonini R. 2005. Nuclear DNA contents, rDNAs and karyotype evolution in subgenus Vicia: II. Section Peregrinae. Protoplasma 226: 181-190.
29. González-Aguilera JJ, Fernández-Peralta AM. 1984. Phylogenetic relationships in the family Resedaceae. Genetica 64: 185-198.
30. Gregory TR. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biological Reviews 76: 65-101.
31. Gregory TR. 2005. Synergy between sequence and size in large-scale genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 699-708.
32. Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysak MA, Bennett MD. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany 95: 255-260.
33. Greilhuber J, Speta F. 1976. C-banded karyotypes in the Scilla hohenackeri group, S. persica and Puschkinia (Liliaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 126: 149-188.
34. Grif VG. 2000. Some aspects of plant karyology and karyosystematics. International Review of Cytology 196: 131-175.
35. Hawkins JS, Grover CE, Wendel JF. 2009. Repeated big bangs and the expanding universe: directionality in plant genome size evolution. Plant Science in press.
36. Hudakova S, Kunzel G, Endo TR, Schubert I. 2002. Barley chromosome arms longer than half of the spindle axis interfere with nuclear divisions. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 98: 101-107.
37. Huziwara Y. 1962. Karyotype analysis in some genera of Compositae. VIII. Further studies on the chromosomes of Aster. American Journal of Botany 49: 116-119.
38. Lavania UC, Srivastava S. 1992. A simple parameter of dispersion index that serves as a adjunct to karyotype asymmetry. Journal of Biosciences 17: 179-182.
39. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2004. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 651-663.
40. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2007. Genome size and its uses: the impact of flow cytometry. In: Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J eds. Flow cytometry with plant cells. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., 153-176.
41. Leitch IJ, Beaulieu JM, Cheung K, Hanson L, Lysak M, Fay MF. 2007. Punctuated genome size evolution in Liliaceae. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 2296-2308.
42. Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201-220.
43. Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosome change in plant evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Lim KY, Matyasek R, Lichtenstein CP, Leitch AR. 2000. Molecular cytogenetic analyses and phylogenetic studies in the Nicotiana section Tomentosae. Chromosoma 109: 245-258.
45. Lim KY, Matyasek R, Kovarik A, Leitch AR. 2004. Genome evolution in allotetraploid Nicotiana. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 599-606.
46. Lim KY, Kovarik A, Matyasek R, et al. 2006. Comparative genomics and repetitive sequence divergence in the species of diploid Nicotiana section Alatae. The Plant Journal 48: 907-919.
47. Lim KY, Kovarik A, Matyasek R, et al. 2007. Sequence of events leading to near-complete genome turnover in allopolyploid Nicotiana within five million years. New Phytologist 175: 756-763.
48. Lysak MA, Lexer C. 2006. Towards the era of comparative evolutionary genomics in Brassicaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 259: 175-198.
49. Lysak MA, Mandakova T. 2007. Unexpected paleopolyploid evolution in Stenopetalum - a genus with the lowest chromosome numbers in the Brassicaceae. Chromosome Research 15: 11-12.
50. Lysak MA, Koch MA, Pecinka A, Schubert I. 2005. Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. Genome Research 15: 516-525.
51. Lysak MA, Berr A, Pecinka A, Schmidt R, McBreen K, Schubert I. 2006. Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 5224-5229.
52. Lysak MA, Cheung K, Kitschke M, Bures P. 2007. Ancestral chromosomal blocks are triplicated in Brassiceae species with varying chromosome number and genome size. Plant Physiology 145: 402-410.
53. Nakamura T. 1968. Cytological studies in family Liliaceae of Japan. 3. Karyotype analysis in genus Tricyrtis. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) 81: 590-599.
54. Narayan RKJ, Rees H. 1976. Nuclear DNA variation in Lathyrus. Chromosoma 54: 141-154.
55. Parida A, Raina SN, Narayan RKJ. 1990. Quantitative DNA variation between and within chromosome complements of Vigna species (Fabaceae). Genetica 82: 125-133.
56. Paszko B. 2006. A critical review and a new proposal of karyotype asymmetry indices. Plant Systematics and Evolution 258: 39-48.
57. Patterson TB, Givnish TJ. 2002. Phylogeny, concerted convergence, and phylogenetic niche conservatism in the core Liliales: insights from rbcL and ndhF sequence data. Evolution 56: 233-252.
58. Patterson TB, Givnish TJ. 2004. Geographic coehesion, chromosomal evolution, parallel adaptive radiations, and consequent floral adaptations in Calochortus (Calochortaceae): evidence from a cpDNA phylogeny. New Phytologist 161: 253-264.
59. Peruzzi L. 2008. Contribution to the cytotaxonomical knowledge of the genus Gagea Salisb. (Liliaceae). III. New karyological data from the C Mediterranean area. Caryologia 61: 92-106.
60. Peruzzi L, Peterson A, Tison J-M, Peterson J. 2008a. Phylogenetic relationships of Gagea Salisb. (Liliaceae) in Italy, inferred from molecular and morphological data matrices. Plant Systematics and Evolution, in press. doi: 10.1007/s00606-008-0081-4
61. Peruzzi L, Tison JM, Peterson A, Peterson J. 2008b. On the phylogenetic position and taxonomic value of Gagea trinervia (Viv.) Greuter and the whole Gagea sect. Anthericoides A. Terracc. (Liliaceae). Taxon 57: 1201-1214.
62. Peterson A, John H, Koch E, Peterson J. 2004. A molecular phylogeny of the genus Gagea (Liliaceae) in Germany inferred from non-coding chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 245: 145-162.
63. Peterson A, Levichev IG, Peterson J. 2008. Systematics of Gagea and Lloydia (Liliaceae) and infrageneric classification of Gagea based on molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46: 446-465.
64. Pires JC, Maureira IJ, Givnish TJ, et al. 2006. Phylogeny, genome size, and chromosome evolution of Asparagales. Aliso 22: 287-304.
65. Plummer JA, Shan FC, Galwey N, Yan GJ. 2003. New methods for comparison of chromosomes within and between species. Caryologia 561: 227-231.
66. Raina SN, Rees H. 1983. DNA variation between and within chromosome complements of Vicia species. Heredity 51: 335-346.
67. Romero Zarco C. 1986. A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon 35: 526-530.
68. Rønsted N, Law S, Thornton H, Fay MF, Chase MW. 2005. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the monophyly of Fritillaria and Lilium (Liliaceae; Liliales) and the infrageneric classification of Fritillaria. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 509-527.
69. Ruffini Castiglione M, Frediani M, Gelati MT, et al. 2007. Cytological and molecular characterization of Vicia esdraeolensis Warb. & Eigr: a rare taxon. Protoplasma 231: 151-156.
70. Sato D. 1943. Karyotype alteration and phylogeny in Liliaceae and allied families. Japanese Journal of Botany 12: 57-161.
71. Schubert I. 2007. Chromosome evolution. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10: 109-115.
72. Schubert I, Oud JL. 1997. There is an upper limit of chromosome size for normal development of an organism. Cell 88: 515-520.
73. Sen S. 1975. Cytotaxonomy of Liliales. Feddes Repertorium 86: 255-305.
74. Shan F, Yan G, Plummer JA. 2003. Karyotype evolution in the genus Boronia (Rutaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 309-320.
75. Srivastava S, Lavania UC. 1991. Evolutionary DNA variation in Papaver. Genome 34: 763-768.
76. Stace HM. 1978. Cytoevolution in the genus Calotis R. Br. (Compositae: Astereae). Australian Journal of Botany 26: 287-307.
77. Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold.
78. Takahashi H. 1991. Karyotype variations of Tricyrtis hirta Hook. (Liliaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 42: 113-124.
79. Takhtajan A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
80. Tamura MN. 1995. A karyological review of the orders Asparagales and Liliales (Monocotyledonae). Feddes Repertorium 106: 83-111.
81. Tamura MN. 1998a. Calochortaceae. In: Kubitzki K ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. III. Flowering plants - monocotyledons, Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 164-172.
82. Tamura MN. 1998b. Liliaceae. In: Kubitzki K ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. III. Flowering plants - monocotyledons, Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 343-353.
83. Tan D-Y, Zhang Z, Li X-R, Hong D-Y. 2005. Restoration of the genus Amana Honda (Liliaceae) based on a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 43: 262-270.
84. Vanzela ALL, Ruas PM, Marin-Morales MA. 1997. Karyotype studies of some species of Dalechampia Plum. (Euphorbiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 125: 25-33.
85. Venora G, Blangiforti S, Frediani M, et al. 2000. Nuclear DNA contents, rDNAs, chromatin organization, and karyotype evolution in Vicia sect. Faba. Protoplasma 213: 118-125.
86. Vijayavalli B, Mathew PM. 1987. Cytology of five species of Smilax from South India. The Nucleus 30: 57-60.
87. Watanabe K, King RM, Yahara T, et al. 1995. Chromosomal cytology and evolution in Eupatorieae (Asteraceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 581-592.
88. Watanabe K, Yahara T, Denda T, Kosuge K. 1999. Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae): statistical tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. Journal of Plant Research 112: 145-161.
89. Zander RH. 2004. Minimal values for reliability of bootstrap and jacknife proportions, decay index, and Bayesian posterior probability. Phyloinformatics 2: 1-13.
90. Zhang T, Gu Z-J. 2005. A new basic chromosome number of x = 7 for the genus Streptopus (Liliaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 43: 533-538.
91. Zhongyan S, Rujuan L, Shouyi Y. 1989. Studies on karyotypes of two species in Fritillaria (Liliaceae). In: Deyuan H ed. Plant chromosome research 1987. Hiroshima: Nishiki Print Co., Ltd, 323-326.
92. Zonneveld BJM, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 2005. First nuclear DNA amounts in more than 300 angiosperms. Annals of Botany 96: 229-244.