Risks for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 among adolescents and young women with abnormal cytology

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 112, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1335-1342

  Moscicki, Anna Barbara ^a   Ma, Yifei ^b   Wibbelsman, Charles ^b   Powers, Adaleen ^b   Darragh, Teresa M ^b   Farhat, Sepideh ^b   Shaber, Ruth ^b   Shiboski, Stephen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ABNORMAL LABORATORY RESULT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; COLPOSCOPY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 16; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 18; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; COHORT ANALYSIS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PATHOLOGY; PREVALENCE; RISK; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VIROLOGY; VIRUS INFECTION;

ADOLESCENT; CALIFORNIA; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COHORT STUDIES; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS 16; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS 18; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58849127436     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818c9222     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56:1-18.
2. Declercq E, Menacker F, Macdorman M. Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002. Am J Public Health 2006;96:867-72.
3. Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, O'Connell CM, Allen VM, Chandra S, et al. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:791-800.
4. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30:235-41.
5. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56:1-103.
6. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ, Sutton PD, Menacker F. Births: preliminary data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005;54: 1-17.
7. Getahun D, Kaminsky LM, Elsasser DA, Kirby RS, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies and risk of primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:376.e1-7.
8. Parrish KM, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weightdistribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. JAMA 1994; 271:443-7.
9. Paldi E, Peretz A. Primary cesarean section in the multipara. Gynaecologia 1964;158:101-8.
10. Qublan H, Alghoweri A, Al-Taani M, Abu-Khait S, Abu-Salem A, Merhej A. Cesarean section rate: the effect of age and parity. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 2002;28:22-5.
11. Van Praagh IG, Tovell HM. Primary Cesarean section in the multipara. Obstet Gynecol 1968;32:813-25.
12. Klein MD, Robbins R, Gabaeff L. Primary cesarean section in the multipara. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963;87:242-52.
13. Gregory KD, Curtin SC, Taffel SM, Notzon FC. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1384-7.
14. Gregory KD, Korst LM, Platt LD. Variation in elective primary cesarean delivery by patient and hospital factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1521-32.
15. Taffel SM, Clarke SC, Placek PJ. Factors influencing primary cesarean rates. JAMA 1994;271:1829-30.
16. Berkowitz GS, Skovron ML, Lapinski RH, Berkowitz RL. Delayed childbearing and the outcome of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1990;322:659-64.
17. Johnson JW, Longmate JA, Frentzen B. Excessive maternal weight and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167:353-70.
18. Crane SS, Wojtowycz MA, Dye TD, Aubry RH, Artal R. Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:213-6.
19. Kliegman RM, Gross T. Perinatal problems of the obese mother and her infant. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:299-306.
20. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Flegal KM. Obesity among adults in the United States-no change since 2003-2004NCHS data brief no 1. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2007.
21. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL. Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960-1994. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998;22:39-47.
22. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA 2002;288:1723-7.
23. Aron DC, Harper DL, Shepardson LB, Rosenthal GE. Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance. JAMA 1998;279:1968-72.
24. Placek PJ, Taffel SM. Trends in cesarean section rates for the United States, 1970-78. Public Health Rep 1980;95:540-8.
25. Placek PJ, Taffel S, Moien M. Cesarean section delivery rates: United States, 1981. Am J Public Health 1983;73:861-2.
26. Murray SF. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ 2000;321:1501-5.
27. Potter JE, Berquo E, Perpetuo IH, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, et al. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ 2001;323:1155-8.
28. Leveno KJ. Rising cesarean delivery and preterm birth rates: are they related? Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:810-1.
29. Florica M, Stephansson O, Nordstrom L. Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;92:181-5.
30. Dubay L, Kaestner R, Waidmann T. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates. J Health Econ 1999;18:491-522.
31. Gregory KD, Korst LM, Gornbein JA, Platt LD. Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesar-ean delivery. Health Serv Res 2002;37:1387-401.
32. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Cardenas V, Nelson JC, Easterling TR, Gardella C, et al. The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:125-34.
33. Green DC, Moore JM, Adams MM, Berg CJ, Wilcox LS, McCarthy BJ. Are we underestimating rates of vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth? The validity of delivery methods from birth certificates. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:581-6.
34. Schoendorf KC, Parker JD, Batkhan LZ, Kiely JL. Comparability of the birth certificate and 1988 Maternal and Infant Health Survey. Vital Health Stat 2 1993;116:1-19.
35. Reichman NE, Hade EM. Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey's HealthStart program. Ann Epidemiol 2001;11:186-93.
36. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30:235-41.
37. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ, Sutton PD, Menacker F. Births: preliminary data for 2004. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol. 54, no. 6. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2005.
38. Weber AM. Elective cesarean delivery: the pelvic perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50:510-17.
39. Wagner M. Choosing caesarean section. Lancet 2000;356: 1677-80.