The "authorities" resolve against home birth

JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-3

  Lowe, Nancy K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58849124806     PISSN: 08842175     EISSN: 15526909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00300.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. American Medical Association (AMA). (2008). Resolutions. Retrieved November 1, 2008, from http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/38/ a08resolutions.pdf
2. Block, J. (2008, July 9). Big medicine's blowback on home births. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 29, 2008, from http://www.latimes.com/ news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-block9-2008jul09,0,3357453.story
3. Hale, R. A. (2008, September). ACOG's positions advocated at AMA meeting. ACOG Today, p. 2.
4. Janssen, P. A., Lee, S. K., Ryan, E. M., Etches, D. J., Farqukarson, D. F., Peacock, D., et al. (2002). Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital birth after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166, 315-323.
5. National Perinatal Association (NPA). (2008). Position paper: Choice of birth setting. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://nationalperinatal.org/