Auditory brainstem correlates of basilar membrane nonlinearity in humans

Audiology and Neurotology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 88-97

  Krishnan, Ananthanarayan ^a   Plack, Christopher J ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Basilar membrane input output function; Compressive nonlinearity; Latency shift; Linear; Off frequency; On frequency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BASILAR MEMBRANE; BRAIN STEM; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY;

BASILAR MEMBRANE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58849116297     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: 14219700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000158537     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ananthanarayan AK, Gerken GM: Post-stimulatory effects on the auditory brainstem response: partial-masking and enhancement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;55:223-226.
2. Ananthanarayan AK, Gerken GM: Response enhancement and reduction of the ABR in a forward-masking paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;66:427-439.
3. Backus BC, Guinan JJ: Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:484-496.
4. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ: A comparison of AP and ABR tuning characteristics In the guinea pig. Hear Res 1987;25:193-204.
5. Burkard R, Sims D: The human auditory brainstem responses to high click rates: aging effects. Am J Audiol 2001;10:53-61.
6. Cooper NP, Yates GK: Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: variations with characteristic frequency. Hear Res 1994;78:221-234.
7. Coats AC: Depression of click action potentials by attenuation, cooling and masking. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1971;284:1-19.
8. Dolan DF, Nuttall AL: Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:1081-1086.
9. Dolan TG, Mills JH, Schmiedt RA: A comparison of brainstem, whole-nerve AP and single-fiber tuning curves in the gerbil: normative data. Hear Res 1985a;17:259-266.
10. Dolan TG, Mills JH, Schmiedt RA: Brainstem, whole-nerve AP and single-fiber suppression in the gerbil: normative data. Hear Res 1985b;18:203-210.
11. Don M, Allen AR, Starr A: Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brainstem responses in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977;86:186-195.
12. Dorn PA, Konrad-Martin D, Neely ST, Keefe DH, Cyr E, Gorga MP: Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:3119-3131.
13. Elshintinawy AA, Abbas PJ: AP and ABR tuning curves: a comparative study. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:S117.
14. Ferry TE, Meddis R: A computer model of medial efferent suppression in the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;122:3519-3526.
15. Geisler CD: Hypothesis on the function of the crossed olivocochlear bundle (letter). J Acoust Soc Am 1974;56:1908-1909.
16. Gorga MP, McGee J, Walsh EJ, Javel E, Farley GR: ABR measurements in the cat using a forward-masking paradigm. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:256-261.
17. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dierking DM, Kopun J, Jolkowski K, Groenenboom K, Tan H, Stiegemann BJ: Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;122:1671-1680.
18. Guinan JJ, Stankovic KM: Medial efferent inhibition produces the largest equivalent attenuations at moderate to high sound levels in cat auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:1680-1690.
19. Harkins SW, McEvoy TM, Scott ML: Effects of interstimulus interval on latency of the brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci 1979;10:7-14.
20. Harris D, Dallos P: Forward-masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. J Neurophysiol 1979;42:1083-1107.
21. Hirsh IJ, Bilger RC: Auditory-threshold recovery after exposures to pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1955;27:1186-1194.
22. Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman MC: Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones. J Neurophysiol 1993;70:2533-2549.
23. Kevanishvilli A, Lagidze Z: Recovery function of the human brainstem auditory evoked potential. Audiology 1979;18:472-484.
24. 1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:795-803.
25. Lasky RE, Rupert AR: Temporal masking of auditory evoked brainstem responses in human newborns and adults. Hear Res 1982;6:315-334.
26. Moller AR, Jannetta PJ: Evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;53:612-620.
27. Nelson DA, Schroder AC, Wojtczak M: A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:2045-2064.
28. Oates P, Stapells DR: Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones. I. High-pass noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1997a;102:3597-3608.
29. Oates P, Stapells DR: Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones. II. Derived response analyses. J Acoust Soc Am 1997b;102:3609-3619.
30. Oates PA, Purdy SC: Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:995-1009.
31. Oxenham AJ, Plack CJ: A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:3666-3675.
32. Patuzzi R: A four-state kinetic model of the temporary threshold shift after loud sound based on inactivation of hair cell transduction channels. Hear Res 1998;125:39-70.
33. Picton TW, Hillyard S, Krausz H, Galambos R: Human auditory-evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974;36:179-190.
34. Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ: Basilar-membrane non-linearity estimated by pulsation threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:501-507.
35. Plack CJ, Drga V: Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:1574-1586.
36. Plack CJ, Drga V, Lopez-Poveda EA: Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1684-1695.
37. Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Drga V: Masking by inaudible sounds and the linearity of temporal summation. J Neurosci 2006;26:8767-8773.
38. Praat H, Sohmer H: Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man. Arch Oto Rhino Laryngol 1976;212:85-92.
39. Prijs VF: On peripheral auditory adaptation. II. Comparison of electrically and acoustically evoked action potentials in the guinea pig. Acustica 1980;45:1-8.
40. Rajan R, Johnstone BM: Crossed cochlear influences on monaural temporary threshold shifts. Hear Res 1983;9:279-294.
41. Reiter ER, Liberman MC: Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1995;73:506-514.
42. Rhode WS: Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;49(suppl 2):1218+.
43. Rhode WS, Robles L: Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1974;55:588-596.
44. Rhode WS, Recio A: Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:3317-3332.
45. Robles L, Ruggero MA, Rich NC: Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;80:1364-1374.
46. Rowe MJ: Normal variability of the brainstem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;44:459-470.
47. Ruggero MA, Rich NC: Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci 1991;11:1057-1067.
48. Ruggero MA: Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1992;2:449-456.
49. Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Recio A: Alteration of basilar membrane responses to sound by acoustic overstimulation; in Duifhuis H, Horst JW, Dijk Pv, Netten SMv (eds): Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems. Singapore, World Scientific, 1993, pp 258-265.
50. Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Robles L, Recio A: The effects of acoustic overstimulation, other cochlear injury and death on basilar membrane responses to sound; in Salvi RJ, Axelsson A, Henderson D, Hamernik R (eds): Effects of Noise on Hearing: Vth International Symposium. Stockholm, Thieme Medical, 1995.
51. Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Recio A, Narayan SS, Robles L: Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:2151-2163.
52. Russell IJ, Nilsen KE: The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:2660-2664.
53. Russell IJ, Murugasu E: Medial efferent inhibition suppresses basilar membrane responses to near characteristic frequency tones of moderate to high intensities. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:1734-1738.
54. Sellick PM, Patuzzi R, Johnstone BM: Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:131-141.
55. Spoor A, Eggermont JJ, Odenthal DW: Comparison of human and animal data concerning adaptation and masking of eighth nerve compound action potential; in Ruben R, Elberling C, Solomon G (eds): Electrocochleography. Baltimore, University Press, 1976, pp 183-198.
56. Strickland E: The temporal effect with notched-noise maskers: analysis in terms of input-output functions. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:2234-2245.
57. Thornton AR, Coleman MJ: The adaptation of cochlear and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975;39:399-406.
58. Yagi T, Kaga K: The effect of click repetition rate on the latency of the auditory brainstem response and its clinical use for a neurological diagnosis. Arch Otolaryngol 1979;222:91-97.
59. Yates GK, Winter IM, Robertson D: Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range. Hearing Res 1990;45:203-220.
60. Yates GK: Cochlear structure and function; in Moore BCJ (ed): Hearing. San Diego, Academic, 1995, pp 41-73.
61. Winslow RL, Sachs MB: Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Hear Res 1988;35:165-189.