Factor structure of the condoms barriers scale with a sample of men at high risk for HIV

Assessment

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-15

  Doyle, Suzanne R ^a   Calsyn, Donald A ^a   Ball, Samuel A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Condom Barriers Scale; Confirmatory factor analysis; Exploratory factor analysis; Factor congruence; Test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

STREET DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDOM; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; CONDOMS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK-TAKING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STREET DRUGS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, INTRAVENOUS; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58849107657     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: 15523489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073191108322259     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Basen-Engquist, K., Masse, L.C., Coyle, K., Kirby, D., Parcel, G.S., Banspach, S., et al. (1999). Validity of scales measuring the psychosocial determinants of HIV/STD-related risk behavior in adolescents. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 14, 25-38.
2. Bentler, P.M., & Kano, Y. (1990). On the equivalence of factors and components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 67-74.
3. Browne, M.W. (1984). Asymptotic distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and. Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
4. Campbell, S.M., Peplau, L.A., & DeBro, S.C. (1992). Women, men, and condoms: Attitudes and experiences of heterosexual college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 273-288.
5. Carter, J.A., McNair, L.D., Corbin, W.R., & Williams, M. (1999). Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: The influence of negotiation styles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 25, 217-225.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Fact sheet for public health personnel: Male latex condoms and sexually transmitted diseases. Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/latex.htm
7. Coyle, S.L., Needle, R.H., & Normand, J. (1998). Outreach-based HIV prevention for injecting drug users: A review of published outcome data. Public Health Reports, 113, 19-30.
8. Crosby, R.A., DiClemente, R.J., Wingood, G.M., Cobb, B.K., Harrington, K., Davies, S.L., et al. (2002). Condom use and correlates of African American adolescent females' infrequent communication with sex partners about preventing sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. Health Education and Behavior, 29, 219-231.
9. Crosby, R.A., DiClemente, R.J., Wingood, G.M., Salazar, L.F., Harrington, K., Davies, S.L., et al. (2003). Identification of strategies for promoting condom use: A Prospective analysis of high-risk African American female teens. Prevention Science, 4, 263-270.
10. Crosby, R., Salazar, L.F., & DiClemente, R.J. (2004). Lack of recent condom use among detained adolescent males: A multilevel investigation. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80, 425-429.
11. Curran, P.J., West, S.G., & Finch, J.F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.
12. D'Agostino, R.B. (1986). Tests for the normal distribution. In R. B. D'Agostino & M. A. Stephens (Eds.), Goodness-of-fit techniques (pp. 367-419). New York: Marcel Dekker.
13. Essien, E.J., Ross, M.W., Fernandez-Esquer, M.E., & Williams, M.L. (2005). Reported condom use and condom use difficulties in street outreach samples of men of four racial and ethnic backgrounds. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 16, 739-743.
14. Fabrigar, L.R., MacCallum, R.C., Wegener, D.T., & Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
15. Floyd, F.J., & Widaman, E.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
16. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1, 189-198.
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
18. Gross, M., Holte, S.E., Marmor, M., Mwatha, A., Koblin, B.A., & Mayer, K.H. (2000). Anal sex among HIV-seronegative women at high risk of HIV exposure. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 24, 393-398.
19. Hanna, K.M., & Tompkins, E.S. (1999). An adolescent and young adult condom perception scale. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21, 621-630.
20. Hayton, J.C., Allen, D.G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191-205.
21. Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
24. Jadack, R.A., Hyde, J.S., & Keller, M.L. (1995). Gender risk and knowledge about HIV, risky sexual behavior, and safer sex practices. Research in Nursing and Health, 19, 313-324.
25. Jennrich, R.I., & Sampson, P.F. (1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31, 313-323.
26. Johnson, E.H., Jackson, L.S., Hinkel, Y., Gilbert, D. l., Hoopwood, T., Lollis, C.M., et al. (1994). What is the significance of black-white differences in risky sexual behavior? Journal of the National Medical Association, 86, 745-759.
27. Jareskog, K.G., & Lawley, D.N. (1968). New methods in maximum likelihood factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2, 83-87.
28. Kaiser, H.F., & Caffrey, J. (1965). Alpha factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 1-14.
29. Kaiser, H.F., & Derflinger, G. (1990). Some contrasts between maximum likelihood factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 29-32.
30. Lee, H.B., & Comrey, A.L. (1979). Distortions in a commonly used factor analytic procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 301-321.
31. Lei, M., & Lomax, R.G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 1-27.
32. Lollis, C.M., Johnson, E.H., & Antoni, M.H. (1997). The efficacy of the health belief model for predicting condom usage and risky sexual practices in university students. AIDS Education and Prevention, 9, 551-563.
33. MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
34. Mardia, K.V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
35. Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K-T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit: Is parsimony always desirable ? Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364-390.
36. Metzger, D.S., Koblin, B., Turner, C., Navaline, H., Valenti, F., Holte, S., et al. (2000). Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152, 99-106.
37. Meyer-Bahlburg, H., Ehrhardt, A., Exner, T.M., & Gruen, R.S. (1991). Sexual risk behavior assessment schedule-adult armory interview. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University.
38. Morrison, D.M., Gillmore, M.R., & Baker, S.A. (1995). Determinants of condom use among high-risk heterosexual adults: A test of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 651-676.
39. O'Connor, B.P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation and Computers, 32, 396-402.
40. SAS. (2004). Release 9.1, software system for Windows. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
41. Smith, L.A. (2003). Partner influence on noncondom use: Gender and ethnic differences. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 346-350.
42. Sohler, N., Colson, P.W., Meyer-Bahlberg, H.F.L., & Susser, E. (2000). Reliability of self-reports about sexual risk behaviors for HIV among homeless men with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 51, 814-816.
43. Sorensen, J.L., Brown, L., Calsyn, D., Tross, S., Booth, R.E., Song, Y., et al. (2007). AIDS research in the NIDA clinical trials network: Emerging results. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 89, 310-313.
44. Sorenson, J.L., & Copeland, A.L. (2000). Drug abuse treatment as an AIDS prevention strategy: A review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 59, 17-31.
45. St. Lawrence, J.S., Chapdelaine, A.P., Devieux, J.G., O'Bannon, R.E., Brasfield, T.L., & Eldridge, G.D. (1999). Measuring perceived barriers to condom use: Psychometric evaluation of the condom barriers scale. Assessment, 6, 391-400.
46. Sunmola, A.M. (2001). Developing a scale for measuring the barriers to condom use in Nigeria. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79, 926-932.
47. Thurstone, L.L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Tucker, L.R. (1951). A method of synthesis of factor analysis studies. (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
49. Turner, N.E. (1998). The effect of common variance and structure pattern on random data eigenvalues: Implications for the accuracy of parallel analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 541-568.
50. von Haeften, I., Fishbein, M., Kaspryzk, D., & Montano, D. (2000). Acting on one's intentions: Variations in condom use intentions and behaviors as a function of type of partner, gender, ethnicity and risk. Psychology Health and Medicine, 5, 163-171.
51. West, S.G., Finch, J.F., & Curran, P.J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Widaman, K.F. (1990). Bias in pattern loadings represented by common factor analysis and component analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 89-95.
53. Widaman, K.F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters ? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263-311.
54. Wrigley, C.S., & Neuhaus, J.O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. American Psychologist, 10, 418-419.