Safety of users in road evacuation: RP vs. SP surveys in demand analysis

WIT Transactions on the Built Environment

Volumn 101, Issue , 2008, Pages 703-713

  Russo, F ^a   Chila G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDITERRANEA OF REGGIO CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Demand model; Emergency condition; Simulation

Indexed keywords

PINCH EFFECT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION;

BEHAVIOURAL APPROACHES; DEMAND ANALYSIS; DEMAND MODEL; EMERGENCY CONDITION; MODAL CHOICES; ON DEMANDS; SIMULATION; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS;

SURVEYS;

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ROAD TRANSPORT; SURVEY; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 58849104411     PISSN: 17433509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2495/UT080681     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ben Akiva M., Lerman S., Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
2. Biggiero L., Russo F., Il progetto di un'indagine rp-sp per la calibrazione congiunta di modelli di domanda intercity passeggeri e merci. In Il trasporto pubblico nei sistemi urbani e metropolitani, Amoroso S. and Crotti A. (Eds.), Franco Angeli, Milan, 1997.
3. Cascetta E., Russo F., Calibrating aggregate travel demand models with traffic counts: Estimators and statistical performance. In Transportation, Vol. 24, 271-293, 1997.
4. Cascetta E., Transportation systems engineering: theory and methods, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001.
5. Domencich T.A., McFadden D. Urban travel demand: a behavioural analysis, American Elsevier, New York, 1975.
6. Lavanco G., Psicologia dei disastri. Comunità e globalizzazione della paura. Franco Angeli, Milan, 2003.
7. Russo F., Vitetta A., Risk in anthropic environments: methodologies for risk evaluation and exposition reduction. In Environmental Health Risk III, Brebbia et al. (ed.), WIT Press, Boston, 2005.
8. Russo F., Vitetta A., Security and Safety in transportation system: models for evacuation analysis in emergency conditions. In International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 2006.
9. Russo F., Vitetta A., An assignment model with modified Logit, which obviates enumeration and overlapping problems, Transp., 33, 347-370, 2006.
10. Russo F., Vitetta A., Safety of users in road evacuation: general methodology and main results. In Urban Transport XIII, Brebbia C.A. (ed.), WIT Press, 763-772, 2007, and in Urban Transport: Safety of Users in Road Evacuation, Russo F. (ed.), WIT Press, 1-10, 2007.
11. Russo F., Chilà G., Sequential models for the mobility decisions: experimentation for the vehicle holding choices. In Proceedings of European Transport Conference 2007, The Netherlands, 2007.
12. Russo F., Chilà G. (2007) Safety of users in road evacuation: demand models. In Urban Transport XIII, Brebbia C.A. (ed.), WIT Press, 773-782, 2007, and in Urban Transport: Safety of Users in Road Evacuation, Russo F. (ed.), WIT Press, 11-20, 2007.
13. Russo F., Chilà G., Domanda di trasporto in condizioni di emergenza. Modelli e metodi per la simulazione, applicazione ad un caso reale, Franco Angeli, Milan, 2007.
14. Wilmot C.G., Fu H., A sequential logit dynamic travel demand model for hurricane evacuation. In Transp. Research Record, Vol. 1882, 19-26, 2004.
15. Wilmot C.G., Fu H., Static vs. Dynamic and Aggregate vs. Disaggregate: A Comparison Between Practice and Research in Hurricane Evacuation Travel Demand Modeling. In Transp. Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, 2007.
16. Wilmot C.G., Fu H., Zhang H., Modeling the Hurricane Evacuation Response Curve. In Transp. Research Record, Issue 2022, 94-102, 2007.