Properties in penetrating capsula of transurethral plasmakinetic resection: Comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate in an ex vivo study

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 97-100

  Qu, Lijun ^a   Wang, Xinghuan ^b   Wang, Huaipeng ^b   Huang, Xing ^b  

^a JINAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUANGDONG PROVINCIAL PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Capsular perforation; Ex vivo model; Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate; Transurethral resection of the prostate

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CAPSULAR PERFORATION; KIDNEY CAPSULE; MALE; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PENETRATING TRAUMA; PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; TRANSURETHRAL PLASMAKINETIC RESECTION; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;

ANIMALS; ELECTROSURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; KIDNEY; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 58849092686     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000176034     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Madersbacher S, Marberger M: Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified? BJU Int 1999;83:227-237.
2. Botto H, lebret T, Barre P, Orsoni Jl, Herve JM, Lugagne PM: Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J Endourol 2001;15:313-316.
3. Issa MM, Young MR, Bullock AR, Bouet R, Petros JA: Dilutional hyponatremia of TURP syndrome: a historical event in the 21st century. Urology 2004;64:298-301.
4. Wang XH, Wang HP, Chen HY, et al: Transurethral resection of the hyperplasic prostate and bladder tumor using bipolar plasmakinetic technique. Chinese J Urol (Chin) 2003;24:318-320.
5. Yang S, Lin WC, Chang HK, et al: Gyrus plasmakinetic: is it better than monopolar transurethral resection of prostate? Urol Int 2004;73:258-261.
6. de Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, et al: Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Urology 2006;67:69-72.
7. Nuhoglu B, Ayyildiz A, Karaguzel E, Cebeci O, Germiyanoglu C: Plasmakinetic prostate resection in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: results of 1-year follow up. Int J Urol 2006;13:21-24.
8. Seckiner I, Yesilli C, Akduman B, Altan K, Mungan NA: A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int 2006;76:139-143.
9. Patankar S, Jamkar A, Dobhada S, Gorde V: PlasmaKinetic superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate. J Endourol 2006;20:215-219.
10. Fitzpatrick JM, Mebust WK: Minimally invasive and endoscopic management of benign prostatic hyperplasia; in Walsh PC (Editor-in-Chief): Campbell's Urology, ed 8. Philadelphia, Elsevier Science, 2002, pp 1379-1422.
11. Heidler H: Frequency and causes of fluid absorption: a comparison of three techniques for resection of the prostate under continuous pressure monitoring. BJU Int 1999;83:619-622.
12. Poulakis V, Ferakis N, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Becht E: Erectile dysfunction after transurethral prostatectomy for lower urinary tract symptoms: results from a center with over 500 patients. Asian J Androl 2006;8:69-74.
13. Smith D, Khoubehi B, Patel A: Bipolar electrosurgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: transurethral electrovaporization and resection of the prostate. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:95-100.
14. Stalder KR, Woloszkko J, Brown IG, et al: Repetitive plasma discharges in saline solutions. Appl Phys Lett 2001;79:4503-4505.
15. Woloszko J, Stalder KR, Brown IG: Plasma characteristics of repetitively-pulsed electrical discharges in saline solutions used for surgical procedures. IEEE. Trans Plasma Sci 2002;30:1376-1383.