Potential for technical errors and subverted allocation can be reduced if certain guidelines are followed: Examples from a web-based survey

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 261-269

  Hewitt, Catherine E ^a   Torgerson, David J ^a   Berger, Vance W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Manipulation; Online survey; Randomization; Subversion; Technical errors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPUTER NETWORK; DATA ANALYSIS; INTERVENTION STUDY; KNOWLEDGE; METHODOLOGY; ONLINE MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SAMPLE (STATISTICS); SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 58749111626     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hewitt C., Hahn S., Torgerson D.J., Watson J., and Bland J.M. Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals. BMJ 330 (2005) 1057-1058
2. Kjaergard L.L., Villumsen J., and Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 135 (2001) 982-989
3. Schulz K.F., Chalmers I., Hayes R.J., and Altman D.G. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273 (1995) 408-412
4. Schulz K.F. Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines. Lancet 348 (1996) 596-598
5. Berger V. Rejoinder: what is to be done about selection bias?. Biom J 47 (2005) 136-139
6. Schulz K.F. Subverting randomisation in controlled trials. JAMA 274 (1995) 1456-1458
7. Berger V. Selection bias and covariate imbalances in randomized clinical trials (2005), Wiley, Chichester
8. Hewitt C., and Torgerson D. Restricted randomisation: is it necessary?. BMJ 332 (2006) 1506-1508
9. Brown S., Thorpe H., Hawkins K., and Brown J. Minimization-reducing predictability for multi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre. Stat Med 24 (2005) 3715-3727
10. Cook T., and Campbell D. Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings (1979), Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company
11. Thornton J.G., Hornbuckle J., Vail A., Spiegelhalter D.J., and Levene M. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364 (2004) 513-520
12. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 2 (1988) 349-360
13. JISCmail[online]. Available fromhttp://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/. Accessed February 2006.
14. Cooper C.J., Cooper S.P., Del Junco D.J., Shipp E.M., Whitworth R., and Cooper S.R. Web-based data collection: detailed methods of a questionnaire and data gathering tool. Epidemiol Perspect Innov (2006) 3
15. Schonlau M., Fricker R., and Elliott M. Conducting research surveys via email and the web (2002), RAND, Santa Monica, CA
16. Bryman A. Social research methods. 2nd edition (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
17. Ritchie J., and Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A., and Burgess R. (Eds). Analysing qualitative data (1994), Routledge, London 173-194
18. In: Ritchie J., and Lewis J. (Eds). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2003), Sage, London
19. Berger V., and Christophi C. Randomization technique, allocation concealment, masking, and susceptibility of trials to selection bias. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 2 (2003) 80-86
20. Cunningham A. A review finds that the autoreply e-mail function avoids problems of subject allocation concealment. J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006) 567-569
21. Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., Moher D., Egger M., Davidoff F., Elbourne D., et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134 (2001) 663-694
22. Scott N., and McPherson G. Minimisation in multicentre clinical trials [abstr]. Control Clin Trials 24 (2003) 175S
23. McPherson G., Campbell M., and Grant A. Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials [abstr]?. Control Clin Trials 23 (2002) 66S