Analysis of the histopathological artifacts in punch biopsies of the normal oral mucosa

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2008, Pages

  Alonso, Fabio Camacho ^a,c   Jornet, Pía López ^a   Torres, María José Jiménez ^b   Domingo, Albina Orduña ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b Alicante General Hospital   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL MORALES MESEGUER   (Spain)

Author keywords

Artifacts; Oral biopsy; Oral mucosa; Punch

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MOUTH MUCOSA; NONHUMAN; PUNCH BIOPSY; RAT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ANIMAL; BIOPSY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY; MALE; MOUTH MUCOSA; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 58749092845     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bernstein ML. Biopsy technique: the pathological considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978 Mar;96(3):438-43.
2. Margarone JE, Natiella JR, Vaughan CD. Artifacts in oral biopsy specimens. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Mar;43(3):163-72.
3. Ficarra G, McClintock B, Hansen LS. Artifacts created during oral biopsy procedures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987 Feb;15(1):34-7.
4. Pogrel MA, Yen CK, Hansen LS. A comparison of carbon dioxide laser, liquid nitrogen cryosurgery, and scalpel wounds in healing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990 Mar;69(3):269-73.
5. Eversole LR. Laser artifacts and diagnostic biopsy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Jun;83(6):639-40.
6. Moule I, Parsons PA, Irvine GH. Avoiding artifacts in oral biopsies: the punch biopsy versus the incisional biopsy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Aug;33(4):244-7.
7. Seoane J, Varela-Centelles P, Ramirez JR, Romero MA, De La Cruz A. Artifacts produced by suture traction during incisional biopsy of oral lesions. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002 Dec;27(6):549-53.
8. Seoane J, Varela-Centelles PI, Ramírez JR, Cameselle-Teijeiro J, Romero MA. Artifacts in oral incisional biopsies in general dental practice: a pathology audit. Oral Dis. 2004 Mar;10(2):113-7.
9. Directive 86/609/CEE, of 24 of November by that the experimentation animal protection settles down. Brussels (1986).
10. Sinha UK, Gallagher LA. Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa. Laryngoscope. 2003 Feb;113(2):228-36.
11. Camacho-Alonso F, López-Jornet P, Bermejo-Fenoll A. Effects of scalpel (with and without tissue adhesive) and cryosurgery on wound healing in rat tongues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Sep;100(3):e58-63.
12. Lynch DP, Morris LF. The oral mucosal punch biopsy: indications and technique. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990 Jul;121(1):145-9.