Continuous assessment of time-varying image quality

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 3016, Issue , 1997, Pages 248-259

  Hamberg, Roelof ^a   De Ridder, Huib ^a  

^a Institute for Perception Research Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Evaluation methodologies; Image quality assessment; MPEG 2

Indexed keywords

IMAGE QUALITY; MOTION PICTURE EXPERTS GROUP STANDARDS; OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES; VIDEO RECORDING;

DIGITAL IMAGING; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; IMAGE SEQUENCING; MPEG-2; PARAMETER SETTINGS; TEMPORAL BEHAVIORS; TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS; VIDEO SEQUENCING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 58749087070     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.274519     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J.A.J. Roufs. Perceptual image quality: concept and measurement. Philips J. Res., 47:35-62, 1992.
2. ITU/R Recommendation BT.500-7, 10/1995. Internet address http://www.itu.ch/
3. J.W. Allnatt. Transmitted-picture assessment. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1983.
4. H. de Ridder and G.M.M. Majoor. Numerical category scaling: an efficient method for assessing digital image coding impairments. In B.E. Rogowitz and J.P. Allebach, editors, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging: Models, Methods, and Applications, pages 65-77. SPIE, 1249, 1990.
5. V. Seferidis, M. Ghanbari, and D.E. Pearson. Forgiveness effect in subjective assessment of packet video. Electronics Letters, 28(21):2013-2014, 1992.
6. R. Aldridge, J. Davidoff, M. Ghanbari, D. Hands, and D. Pearson. Measurement of scene-dependent quality in the assessment of digitally-coded television pictures. IEE Proc. on Vision, Image, and Signal Processing, 1995, vol. 142, no. 3, 149-154.
7. N.K. Lodge. Interpolative Coding Methods for the Digital Transmission of Conventional and High Definition Television. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, 1993.
8. M.R.M. Nijenhuis. Sampling and interpolation of static images: a perceptual view. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1993.
9. R. Hamberg and H. de Ridder. Continuous assessment of perceptual image quality. J.O.S.A. A, vol. 12, no. 12, 2573-2577, 1995.
10. C. Chatfield. Statistics for technology. Chapman and Hall, London, 3rd edition, 1983.
11. H. de Ridder. Minkowski-metrics as a combination rule for digital-image-coding impairments. In B.E. Rogowitz, editor, Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, pages 16-26. SPIE, 1666, 1992.
12. R.J. Watt and M.J. Morgan. The recognition and representation of edge blur: evidence for spatial primitives in human vision. Vision Research, 23:1465-1477, 1983.
13. J.B. Martens. The Hermite Transform - Theory. IEEE Trans. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 38:1595-1606, 1990.
14. J.J. Vos, J. Walraven, and A. van Meeteren. Light profiles of the foveal image of a point source. Vision Research, 16:215-219, 1976.
15. A.J. Ahumada Jr. Computational Image-Quality Metrics: A Review. In SID 93 Digest, pages 305-308, 1993.
16. R. Aldridge, J. Davidoff, M. Ghanbari, D. Hands, and D. Pearson. Subjective assessment of time-varying coding distortions. Paper presented to the International Picture Coding Symposium, Melbourne, Australia, March 13-15, pages 269-274, 1996.