Energy conservation regulations: Impacts on design and procurement of low energy buildings

Building and Environment

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 929-936

  Hamza, Neveen ^a   Greenwood, David ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Building energy model; Collaborative design; Energy efficient design; Part L Building Regulations; Procurement

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; BUILDINGS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONSERVATION; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; CONTRACTORS; CONTRACTS; DESIGN; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; GLOBAL WARMING; LEAKAGE (FLUID); PROGRAMMING THEORY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

BUILDING ENERGY MODEL; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; ENERGY-EFFICIENT DESIGN; PART L BUILDING REGULATIONS; PROCUREMENT;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY USE; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WALES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 58749086024     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hamza N., and Greenwood D. The impact of procurement routes on delivering energy conscious buildings. In: Boyd D. (Ed). Proceedings of Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Vol. 2 (September 3-5 2007) 723-732 Belfast, Northern Ireland
2. Lane T. The nightmare has begun. Building (2006 April) 25-27
3. Adeyeye K., Osmani M., and Brown C. Energy conservation and building design: the environmental legislation push and pull factors. Structural Survey 25 5 (2007) 375-390
4. DCLG. A report produced by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) (LTD) for the Department for Communities and Local Government (2007), HMSO, London Achieving building standards: final report
5. Gann D., Wang Y., and Hawkins R. Do regulations encourage innovation? - The case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research & Information 26 5 (1998) 280-296
6. May P. Performance-based regulation and regulatory regimes: the saga of leaky buildings. Law & Policy 25 4 (2003) 381-401
7. Hamza N, Elkadi H. Impacts of thermal performance regulations on office building refurbishment. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference for Teachers of Architecture (TIA). Oxford, UK: July, 2000.
8. Beller D., Everall P., and Meacham F.G. Qualitative versus quantitative performance based regulations. CIB World Building Congress Proceedings (April, 2001), New Zealand, Wellington
9. Association of Consulting Engineers. The consultants' performance indicator report, Part 1. 2003. p. 48.
10. RICS Contracts in Use. Available at http://www.rics.org/NR/rdonlyres/E741B97E-084A-4C72-9759-92867705F50B/0/36084_ContratcsinUseVersion3Final.pdf; 2004 (accessed 15 May 2007).
11. Hughes W., Hillebrandt P., Greenwood D., and Kwawu W. Procurement in the construction industry: the impact and cost of alternative market and supply processes. Spon Research Series (2006), Taylor & Francis, London
12. Hughes W., Greenwood D., and Hillebrandt P. Impact of procurement method on costs of procurement. In: Kahkonen K. (Ed). Proceedings of 11th Joint CIB International Symposium - Combining Forces - Advancing Facilities Management and Construction through Innovation (13-16 June, 2005) Helsinki, Finland
13. Greenwood D. An innovative approach to procurement using integrated supply chains. Ascot: Chartered Institute of Building. Construction Information Quarterly 8 1 (2006) 3-6
14. Latham M. Constructing the team. Final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry (1994), HMSO, London
15. Greenwood D., and Walker P. Procurement, contracts and conditions of engagement. In: Murray M., and Longford D. (Eds). Architect's handbook of construction project management (2004), RIBA Enterprises, London