Research governance: Has it become a research hindrance?

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 137-139

  Gill, Paul ^a   Burnard, Philip ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 58649084598     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.11.007     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Corr S., Beaulieu K., and Griffiths S. Research governance, not research 'smotherance'. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 13 2 (2006) 56
2. Department of Health. Research Governance for Health and Social Care (2001), DoH, London
3. Dingwall R. An exercise in fatuity: research governance and the emasculation of HSR. Journal of Health Service Research Policy 11 4 (2006) 193-194
4. Elwyn G., Seagrove A., Thorne K., and Cheung W.Y. Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocol. British Medical Journal 330 (2005) 847
5. Fazackerley, A., 2004. Top cancer expert: 'I'll go to jail for science'. Times Higher Education Supplement. 27th February 2004, p. 91.
6. Galbraith N., Hawley C., and De-Souza V. Research governance. Research governance is putting people off research. British Medical Journal 332 (2006) 238
7. Johnson M. Real world ethics and nursing research. NT Research 9 4 (2004) 251-261
8. Long T., and Johnson M. Research Ethics in the Real World: Issues and Solutions for Health and Social Care (2007), Churchill Livingstone - Elsevier
9. Walters P. 150 days an underestimate. British Medical Journal 330 (2005) 847