Isobutyl amides - Potent compounds for controlling Diatraea saccharalis

Pest Management Science

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 47-51

  Debonsi, Hosana M ^a   Miranda, José E ^b   Murata, Afonso T ^c   De Bortoli, Sérgio A ^d   Kato, Massuo J ^a   Bolzani, Vanderlan S ^d   Furlan, Maysa ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c CEFET Cuiabá   (Brazil)

^d SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Diatraea saccharalis; Isobutyl amides; Piper tuberculatum; Sugarcane borer

Indexed keywords

1,3 BENZODIOXOLE DERIVATIVE; 4,5 DIHYDROPIPERLONGUMININE; 4,5-DIHYDROPIPERLONGUMININE; AMIDE; INSECTICIDE; PELLITORINE; PLANT EXTRACT; UNSATURATED FATTY ACID;

BIOASSAY; CATERPILLAR; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; INSECT; MORTALITY; SEED; SUGAR CANE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; LARVA; LD 50; MOTH; PLANT SEED; TIME;

AMIDES; ANIMALS; BENZODIOXOLES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FATTY ACIDS, UNSATURATED; INSECTICIDES; LARVA; LETHAL DOSE 50; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MOTHS; PLANT EXTRACTS; POLYUNSATURATED ALKAMIDES; SEEDS; TIME FACTORS;

DIATRAEA SACCHARALIS; HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; PIPER TUBERCULATUM; PIPERACEAE; PYRALIDAE;

EID: 58549120952     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1643     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rosenheim JA and Hoy MA, Genetic improvement of a parasitoid biological control agent: artificial selection for insecticide resistance in Aphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). J Econ Entomol 81:1538-1550 (1988).
2. Grafton-Cardwell EE and Hoy MA, Genetic improvement of common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chysopidae): selection of carbaryl resistence. Envron Entomol 15:1130-1136 (1986).
3. Johnson MW and Tabashinik BE, Laboratory selection for pesticide resistance in natural enemies, in Applications of Genetics to Arthropods of Biological Control Significance, ed. by Narang SK, Bartlett AC and Faust RM. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 91-105 (1993).
4. Nakano O, Batista GC and Silveira Neto S, Controle químico, in Curso de Entomologia Aplicada à Agricultura. FEALQ, Piracicaba, Brazil, pp. 159-196 (1992).
5. Copping LG and Duke SO, Natural products that have been used commercially as crop protection agents. Pest Manag Sci 63:524-554 (2007).
6. Navickiene HMD, Alécio AC, Kato MJ, Bolzani VdaS, Young MCM, Cavalheiro AJ, et al, Antifungal amides from Piper hispidum and Piper tuberculatum. Phytochemistry 55:621-626 (2000).
7. Miyakado M, Nakayama I, Ono L and Yoshioka H, Structure, chemistry and actions of the Piperaceae amides: new insecticidal constituents isolated from Piper plants. Curr Them Trop Sci 2:369-372 (1983).
8. Su HCS and Horwart R, Isolation, identification and insecticidal properties of Piper nigrum amides. J Agric Food Chem 29:115-118 (1989).
9. Gbewomya HSK, Candy DJ and Anderson M, Structure and activity relationships of insecticidal amides from Piper guineense roots. Pestic Sci 37:57-66 (1993).
10. Bernard CB, Krishnamurty HG, Chauret D, Durst T, Philogène BJR, Sanchez-Vindas P, et al, Insecticide defenses of Piperaceae from the Neotropics. J Chem Ecol 21:801-814 (1995).
11. Scott IM, Puniani E, Durst T, Phelps D, Merali S, Assabgui RA, et al, Insecticidal activity of Piper tuberculatum Jacq. extracts: synergistic interaction of piperamides. Agric Forest Entomol 4:137-144 (2002).
12. Pagnocca FC, Victor SR, Bueno FC, Crisóstomo FR, Castral TC, Fernandes JB, et al, Synthetic amides toxic to the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa L. and its symbiotic fungus. Agric Forest Entomol 8:17-23 (2006).
13. Silva RV, Navickiene HMD, Meda CI, Kato MJ, Bolzani VdaS, Young MCM, et al, Antifungal amides from Piper arboreum and Piper tuberculatum. Phytochemistry 59:521-527 (2002).
14. Navickiene HMD, Miranda JE, Bortoli SA, Kato MJ, Bolzani VdaS and Furlan M, Toxicity of extracts and isobutyl amides from Piper tuberculatum: potent compounds with potential for the control of the velvetbean caterpillar, Anticarsia gemmatalis. Pest Manag Sci 63:399-403 (2007).
15. Navickiene HMD, Bolzani VdaS, Kato MJ, Pereira AMS, Bertoni BW, França SC, et al, Quantitative determination of anti-fungal and insecticide amides in adult plants, plantlets and callus from Piper tuberculatum by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Phytochem Anal 14:281-284 (2003).
16. Rosario SL, Silva AJR and Parente JP, Alkamides from Cissampelos glaberrina. Plant Med 62:376-377 (1996).
17. Hensley SD and Hammond AM, Laboratory techniques for rearing the sugar cane borer on an artificial diet. J Econ Entomol 61:1742-1743 (1968).
18. Metcalf RL, Methods of topical application and injection, in Methods of Testing Chemicals on Insects, ed. by Shepard HH. Burgess, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 92-114 (1958).
19. Finney DJ, Probit Analysis: Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp. 50-80 (1971).
20. Robertson JL and Preisler HK, Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1992).
21. Marchini LC, Alves SB and Nakano O, Sericicultura, in Curso de Entomologia Aplicada à Agricultura. FEALQ, Piracicaba, Brazil, pp. 705-736 (1992).
22. Savin NE, Robertson JL and Russel RM, A critical evaluation of bioassay in insecticide research: likelihood ratio test of dose-mortality regression. Bull Entomol Soc Amer 23:257-266 (1977).