Estimating particle-size fractions of soil dominated by silicate minerals from geochemistry

European Journal of Soil Science

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 116-126

  Rawlins, B G ^a   Webster, R ^b   Tye, A M ^a   Lawley, R ^a   O'Hara, S L ^c  

^a BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DATA SET; FEASIBILITY STUDY; PARTICLE SIZE; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAND; SILICATE; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOIL CHEMISTRY; SOIL SURVEY; TOPSOIL;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 58549120395     PISSN: 13510754     EISSN: 13652389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01112.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aitchison, J. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Chapman & Hall, London.
2. British Geological Survey. 2006. Digital Geological Map of Great Britain 1:50 000 scale (DiGMapGB-50) data [CD-ROM] Version 3.14. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
3. Brown, D.J., Bricklemyer, R.S. Miller, P.R. 2005. Validation requirements for diffuse reflectance soil characterization models with a case study of VNIR soil C prediction in Montana. Geoderma, 129, 251 267.
4. Dickson, B.L. Scott, K.M. 1998. Recognition of aeolian soils of the Blayney district, NSW: implications for mineral exploration. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 63, 237 251.
5. Elias, E.A., Bacchi, O.O.S. Reichardt, K. 1999. Alternative soil particle-size analysis by gamma-ray attenuation. Soil and Tillage Research, 52, 121 123.
6. Hodgson, J.M. 1974. Soil Survey Field Handbook. Technical Monograph No 5. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Lawes Agricultural Trust, Harpenden.
7. Hodgson, J.M., Hollis, J.M., Jones, R.J.A. Palmer, R.C. 1976. A comparison of field estimates and laboratory analyses of the silt and clay contents of some West Midlands soils. Journal of Soil Science, 27, 411 419.
8. Konert, M. Vandenberghe, J. 1997. Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology, 44, 523 535.
9. Lark, R.M, Bishop, T.F.A. Webster, R. 2007. Using expert knowledge with control of false discovery rate to select regressors for prediction of soil properties. Geoderma, 138, 65 78.
10. Rawlins, B.G., Lark, R.M., O'Donnell, K.E., Tye, A.M. Lister, T.R. 2005. The assessment of point and diffuse metal pollution from an urban geochemical survey of Sheffield, England. Soil Use and Management, 21, 353 362.
11. Salminen, R., Batista, M.J., Bidovec, M., Demetriades, A., De Vivo, B., De Vos, W. et al. 2005. Geochemical Atlas of Europe, Part 1: Background Information, Methodology and Maps. Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
12. Shepherd, K.D. Walsh, M.G. 2002. Development of reference spectral libraries for characterization of soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 988 998.
13. Waiser, T.H., Morgan, C.L.S., Brown, D.J. Hallmark, C.T. 2007. In situ characterization of soil clay content with visible near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71, 389 396.
14. Zhao, F.J., McGrath, S.P. Merrington, G. 2007. Estimates of ambient background concentrations of trace metals in soils for risk assessment. Environmental Pollution, 148, 221 229.