Semantics and truth relative to a world

Synthese

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 281-307

  Glanzberg, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Content; Intensional logic; Possible worlds; Relativism; Semantic value; Semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 58549119151     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-007-9285-3     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anderson C.A. (1984). General intensional logic. In: Gabbay D., Guenthner F. (eds) Handbook of philosophical logic (Vol. II). Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 355-385
2. K. Bach 1994 Conversational impliciture Mind and Language 9 124 162
3. Barwise J., Perry J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MIT Press
4. Ben-Avi G., Winter Y. (2007). A modular approach to intensionality. In: Puig-Waldmüller E. (ed) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11. Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, pp. 76-90
5. van Benthem J. (1991). Language in action. Amsterdam, North-Holland
6. Blackburn P., de Rijke M., Venema Y. (2001). Modal logic. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
7. Carnap R. (1947). Meaning and necessity. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
8. Chierchia G., McConnell-Ginet S. (1990). Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MIT Press
9. Church A. (1951). A formulation of the logic of sense and denotation. In: Henle P., Kallen H.M., Langer S.K. (eds) Structure, method, and meaning: Essays in honor of H. M. Sheffer. New York, Liberal Arts Press, pp. 3-24
10. Cresswell M.J. (1973). Logics and languages. London, Methuen
11. Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17, 304-323. Reprinted in Davidson (1984).
12. Davidson D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford, Oxford University Press
13. Dowty D.R., Wall R.E., Peters S. (1981). Introduction to Montague semantics. Dordrecht, Reidel
14. A. Egan 2007 Epistemic modals, relativism, and assertion Philosophical Studies 133 1 22
15. Egan A., Hawthorne J., Weatherson B. (2005). Epistemic modals in context. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Contextualism in philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 131-168
16. Elbourne P.D. (2005). Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MIT Press
17. M. Enç 1986 Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions Linguistics and Philosophy 9 405 426
18. M. Enç 1987 Anchoring conditions for tense Linguistic Inquiry 18 633 657
19. Evans, G. (1985). Does tense logic rest upon a mistake? In Collected papers (pp. 342-362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25-50. References are to the translation as "On Sense and Meaning" by M. Black, reprinted in Frege-84.
21. Frege, G. (1984). In B. McGuinness (Ed.), Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
22. Gallin D. (1975). Intensional and higher-order modal logic. Amsterdam, North-Holland
23. Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Logic, language, and meaning, Vol. 2: Intensional logic and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 'Gamut' is a pseudonym for van Benthem, Groenendijk, de Jongh, Stokhof, and Verkuyl.
24. M. Glanzberg 2007 Context, content, and relativism Philosophical Studies 136 1 29
25. Goldblatt R. (1993). Mathematics of modality. Stanford, CSLI Publications
26. Harman G., Thomson J.J. (1996). Moral relativism and moral objectivity. Oxford, Blackwell
27. Heck R.G., May R. (2006). Frege's contribution to philosophy of language. In: Lepore E., Smith B.C. (eds) Oxford handbook of philosophy of language. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 3-39
28. Heim I. (1991). Artikel und definitheit. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 487-535
29. Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford, Blackwell
30. Higginbotham J. (1988). Contexts, models, and meanings: A note on the data of semantics. In: Kempson R. (ed) Mental representations: The interface between language and reality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-48
31. Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481-563). Oxford: Oxford University Press. First publication of a widely circulated manuscript dated 1977.
32. J.C. King 2003 Tense, modality, and semantic value Philosophical Perspectives 17 195 245
33. King J.C., Stanley J. (2004). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In: Szabó Z.G. (ed) Semantics vs pragmatics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 111-164
34. Kölbel M. (2002). Truth without objectivity. London, Routledge
35. M. Kölbel 2003 Faultless disagreement Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 53 73
36. Kripke S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Harvard University Press
37. Kusumoto, K. (1999). Tense in embedded contexts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
38. Larson R., Segal G. (1995). Knowledge of meaning. Cambridge, MIT Press
39. P. Lasersohn 2005 Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste Linguistics and Philosophy 28 643 686
40. Lasersohn, P. (forthcoming). Relative truth, speaker commitment, and control of implicit arguments. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society, 37.
41. E. Lepore 1983 What model-theoretic semantics cannot do Synthese 54 167 187
42. C.I. Lewis 1943 The modes of meaning Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 236 250
43. Lewis, D. (1970). General semantics. Synthese, 22, 18-67. Reprinted in Lewis-83.
44. Lewis D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Cambridge, Harvard University Press
45. Lewis D. (1983). Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Oxford, Oxford University Press
46. Lewis D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford, Blackwell
47. J. [tmp] MacFarlane 2003 Future contingents and relative truth Philosophical Quarterly 53 321 336
48. J. [tmp] MacFarlane 2005 Making sense of relative truth Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 321 339
49. Montague, R. (1973). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches to natural language (pp. 221-242). Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in Montague-74.
50. Montague, R. (1974). In R. Thomason (Ed.), Formal philosophy. New Haven, Yale University Press
51. C. Parsons 1982 Intensional logic in extensional language Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 289 328
52. Partee B.H., Hendriks H.L.W. (1997). Montague grammar. In: van Benthem J., ter Meulen A. (eds) Handbook of logic and language. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 5-91
53. O. Percus 2001 Constraints on some other variables in syntax Natural Language Semantics 8 173 229
54. Pohlers W. (1989). Proof theory. Berlin, Springer-Verlag
55. M. Richard 1981 Temporalism and eternalism Philosophical Studies 39 1 13
56. M. Richard 1982 Tense, propositions, and meanings Philosophical Studies 41 337 351
57. S. Soames 1987 Direct reference, propositional attitudes, and semantic content Philosophical Topics 15 47 87
58. Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics, Vol. 9 of Syntax and semantics (pp. 315-322). New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Stalnaker (1999).
59. Stalnaker R.C. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge, MIT Press
60. Stalnaker R.C. (1999). Context and content. Oxford, Oxford University Press
61. T.E. Zimmermann 1989 Intensional logic and two-sorted type theory Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 65 77