Intraspecific taxonomy and ecology characterize morphological divergence among cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp. Richardson) populations

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 266-281

  Seiler, Meredith B ^a,b   Keeley, Ernest R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^b Nucl Eng Idaho State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecotype; Intraspecific diversity; Morphology; Subspecies

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; ECOTYPE; FISH; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MORPHOLOGY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUBSPECIES; TAXONOMY;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKII; ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKII BOUVIERI; ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKII CLARKII; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 58549119133     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01130.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF. 1988. Conservation and distribution of genetic variation in a polytypic species, the cutthroat trout. Conservation Biology 2 : 170 184.
2. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Hitt NP, Knudsen KL, Boyer MC, Spruell P. 2005. Cutthroat trout hybridization and the US Endangered Species Act: one species, two policies. Conservation Biology 19 : 1326 1328.
3. Arnold GP, Webb PW, Holford BH. 1991. The role of pectoral fns in station-holding of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar). Journal of Experimental Biology 156 : 625 629.
4. Baillie J, Groomebridge B. 1996. IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Gland : The World Conservation Union.
5. Behnke RJ. 1992. Native Trout of Western North America. Bethesda, MD : American Fisheries Society.
6. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 57 : 289 300.
7. Blackwelder RE. 1967. Taxonomy. New York, NY : John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
8. Boily P, Magnan P. 2002. Relationship between individual variation in morphological characters and swimming costs in brook char (Salvelinus fontinalis) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens). Journal of Experimental Biology 205 : 1031 1036.
9. Brooks DR, Mayden RL, McLennan DA. 1992. Phylogeny and biodiversity: conserving our evolutionary legacy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7 : 55 59.
10. CSAR (Consolidated Statues and Regulations). 2004. Species At Risk Act: a guide. Ottawa : Environment Canada.
11. Chapin FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405 : 234 242.
12. Cho GK, Heath DD. 2000. Comparison of tricaine methanesulphonate (MS222) and clove oil anesthesia effects on the physiology of juvenile Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum). Aquaculture Research 31 : 537 546.
13. Ford MJ. 2004. Conservation units and preserving diversity. In : Hendry AP, ed. Evolution illuminated: salmon and their relatives. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
14. Gresswell RE, Liss WJ, Larson GL. 1994. Life-history organization of Yellowstone cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki bouvieri) in Yellowstone Lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51 : 298 309.
15. Haig SM, Beever EA, Chambers SM, Draheim HM, Dugger BD, Dunham S, Elliott-Smith E, Fontaine JB, Kesler DC, Knaus BJ, Lopes IF, Loschl P, Mullins TD, Sheffield LM. 2006. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the US Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 20 : 1584 1594.
16. Hey J, Waples RS, Arnold ML, Butlin RK, Harrison RG. 2003. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 : 597 603.
17. Jackson DA. 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74 : 2204 2214.
18. Keeley ER, Grant JWA. 2001. Prey size of salmonid fishes in streams, lakes, and oceans. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58 : 1122 1132.
19. Keeley ER, Parkinson EA, Taylor EB. 2005. Ecotypic differentiation of native rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations from British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62 : 1523 1539.
20. Keeley ER, Parkinson EA, Taylor EB. 2007. The origins of ecotypic variation of rainbow trout: a test of environmental vs. genetically based differences in morphology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20 : 725 736.
21. Kristjansson BK, Skulason S, Noakes DLG. 2002. Morphological segregation of Icelandic threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L). Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 76 : 247 257.
22. Leary RF, Allendorf FW, Phelps SR, Knudsen KL. 1987. Genetic divergence and identification of seven cutthroat trout subspecies and rainbow trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116 : 580 587.
23. Lentsch LD, Toline CA, Kershner J, Hudson JM, Mizzi J. 2000. Range-wide conservation agreement and strategy for Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah). Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Pub. No. 19.
24. Loudenslager EJ, Gall GAE. 1980. Geographic patterns of protein variation and subspeciation in cutthroat trout, Salmo clarki. Systematic Zoology 29 : 27 42.
25. McCann KS. 2000. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405 : 228 223.
26. McLaughlin RL, Grant JWA. 1994. Morphological and behavioural differences among recently-emerged brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis, foraging in slow- vs. fast-running water. Environmental Biology of Fishes 39 : 289 300.
27. McPhail, JD, Lindsey CC. 1986. Zoogeography of the freshwater fishes of Cascadia (the Columbia system and rivers north to the Stikine). In : Hocutt CH, Wiley EO, eds. The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. New York, NY : Wiley and Sons, Inc., 615 637.
28. Malde HE. 1965. Snake river plain. In : Wright HE, Frey DG, eds. The Quaternary of the United States, A review volume for the VII congress of the international association for Quaternary research. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 255 262.
29. Mayden RL, Wood RM. 1995. Systematics, species concepts, and the evolutionary significant unit in biodiversity and conservation biology. In : Nielsen JL, ed. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique in population conservation. Symposium 17. Bethesda MD : American Fisheries Society, 58 113.
30. Mayr E. 1982. Of what use are subspecies? The Auk 99 : 593 595.
31. Mayr E, Ashlock PD. 1991. Principles of systematic zoology. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.
32. Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP, Lawton JH, Woodfin RM. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368 : 734 736.
33. Nelson JS. 2006. Fishes of the world, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley and Sons Inc.
34. Nelson JS, Crossman EJ, Espinosa-Pérez H, Findley LT, Gilbert CR, Lea RN, Williams JD. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Special Publication 29. Bethesda, MD : American Fisheries Society.
35. Ojanguren AF, Brana F. 2003. Effects of size and morphology on swimming performance in juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12 : 241 246.
36. Pakkasmaa S, Piironen J. 2001. Water velocity shapes juvenile salmonids. Evolutionary Ecology 14 : 721 730.
37. Pennock DS, Dimmick WW. 1997. Critique of the evolutionary significant unit as a definition for 'Distinct Population Segments' under the US Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 11 : 611 619.
38. Phillimore AB, Owens IPF. 2006. Are subspecies useful in evolutionary and conservation biology? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 273 : 1049 1053.
39. Proulx R, Magnan P. 2004. Contribution of phenotypic plasticity and heredity to the trophic polymorphism of lacustrine brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis M.). Evolutionary Ecology Research 6 : 503 522.
40. Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
41. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna : R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org
42. Riddell BE, Leggett WC. 1981. Evidence of an adaptive basis for geographic variation in body morphology and time of downstream migration of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38 : 308 320.
43. Rohlf, FJ. 1993. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application in mosquito wings. In : Marcus LF, Bello E, Garcia-Valdecasas A, eds. Geometrical morphometrics. Madrid : Monografias Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, 131 159.
44. Rohlf FJ. 2005a. tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines. Version 2.04. New York, NY : Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook.
45. Rohlf FJ. 2005b. tpsRelw, relative warp analysis. Version 1.42. New York, NY : Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook.
46. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS online document, Version 9.1. Cary, NC : SAS Institute Inc., 131 159.
47. Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
48. Seiler SM, Keeley ER. 2007. Morphological and swimming stamina differences between Yellowstone cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii bouvieri), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and their hybrids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64 : 127 135.
49. Smith GR, Dowling TE, Gobalet KW, Lugaski T, Shiozawa DK, Evans RP. 2002. Biogeography and timing of evolutionary events among Great Basin fishes. In : Hershler R, Madsen DB, Curry DR, eds. Great basin aquatic systems history. Smithsonian Contributions to Earth Sciences, Number 33. Washington, DC : Smithsonian Institution Press, 175 234.
50. Smith TB, Skulason S. 1996. Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fishes, amphibians, and birds. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics 27 : 111 133.
51. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco, CA : WH Freeman and Co.
52. Thorpe RS. 1976. Biometric analysis of geographic variation and racial affinities. Biological Reviews 51 : 407 452.
53. Tilman D. 2000. Causes, consequences, and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405 : 208 211.
54. Trotter PC. 1989. Coastal cutthroat trout: a life history compendium. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118 : 463 474.
55. Turesson G. 1922. The species and the variety as ecological units. Hereditas 3 : 100 113.
56. US Department of Interior and US Department of Commerce. 1996. Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the Endangered Species Act. Federal Register 61 : 4722 4725.
57. Wainwright PC. 1996. Ecological explanation through functional morphology: the feeding biology of sunfishes. Ecology 77 : 1336 1343.
58. Waples R. 1991. Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. and the definition of 'species' under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review 53 : 11 22.
59. Watters JV, Lema SC, Nevitt GA. 2003. Phenotype management: a new approach to habitat restoration. Biological Conservation 112 : 435 445.
60. Webb PW. 1984. Body form, locomotion, and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. American Zoologist 24 : 107 120.
61. Weeks PJD, Gaston KJ. 1997. Image analysis, neural networks, and the taxonomic impediment to biodiversity studies. Biodiversity Conservation 6 : 263 274.
62. Wofford JEB, Gresswell RE, Banks MA. 2005. Influence of barriers to movement on within watershed genetic variation of coastal cutthroat trout. Ecological Applications 15 : 628 637.
63. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Amsterdam : Elsevier Academic Press.
64. Zink RM. 2004. The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 271 : 561 564.