Stratocladistics: Integrating temporal data and character data in phylogenetic inference

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Volumn 39, Issue , 2008, Pages 365-385

  Fisher, Daniel C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ancestor descendant hypotheses; Cladograms; Parsimony; Phylogenetic trees; Stratigraphic order

Indexed keywords

ANCESTRY; BIOSTRATIGRAPHY; CLADISTICS; DATABASE; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; TAXONOMY;

EID: 58549111834     PISSN: 1543592X     EISSN: 15452069     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095752     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Adrain JM, Westrop SR. 2001. Stratigraphy, phylogeny, and species sampling in time and space. In Fossils, Phylogeny, and Form: An Analytical Approach, ed. JM Adrain, GD Edgecombe, BS Lieberman, pp. 291-322. New York: Kluwer Acad.
2. Alroy J. 1995. Continuous track analysis: a new phylogenetic and biogeographic method. Syst. Biol. 44:152-78
3. Alroy J. 2002. Stratigraphy in phylogeny reconstruction-reply to Smith 2000. J. Paleont. 76:587-89
4. Benton MJ, Hitchin R. 1997. Congruence between phylogenetic and stratigraphic data on the history of life. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 264:885-90
5. Bloch JI, Fisher DC, Rose KD, Gingerich PD. 2001. New genus of Late Tiffanian carpolestid and stratocladistic analysis of North American Carpolestidae (Mammalia, Plesiadapiformes). J. Vert. Paleont. 21:118-30
6. Bodenbender BE, Fisher DC. 2001. Stratocladistic analysis of blastoid phylogeny. J. Paleont. 75:351-69
7. Brundin L. 1968. Application of phylogenetic principles in systematics and evolutionary theory. In Current Problems of Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny, ed. T Ørvig, Nobel Symp. 4:473-95. New York: Wiley
8. Clyde WC, Fisher DC. 1997. Comparing the fit of stratigraphic and morphologic data in phylogenetic analysis. Paleobiology 23:1-19
9. Cracraft J, Eldredge N, eds. 1979. Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
10. Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA, Gauthier J, Kluge AG, Rowe T. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:431-60
11. Edwards AWF, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1963. The reconstruction of evolution. Ann. Hum. Genet. 27:104-5
12. Eldredge N. 1979. Cladism and common sense. See Cracraft & Eldredge 1979, pp. 165-98
13. Engelmann GF, Wiley EO. 1977. The place of ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Zool. 26:1-11
14. Farris JS. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In Advances in Cladistics, Vol. 2, ed. NI Platnick, VA
15. Funk, pp. 7-36. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
16. Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-19
17. Felsenstein J. 1979. Alternative methods of phylogenetic inference and their interrelationships. Syst. Zool. 28:49-62
18. Fisher DC. 1980. The role of stratigraphic data in phylogenetic inference. Geol. Soc. Am., Abstr. Prog. 12(7):426 (Abstr.)
19. Fisher DC. 1981. The role of functional analysis in phylogenetic inference: examples from the history of the Xiphosura. Am. Zool. 21:62-77
20. Fisher DC. 1982. Phylogenetic and macroevolutionary patterns within the Xiphosurida. In Proc. Third North American Paleontological Convention, ed. B Mamet, MJ Copeland, 1:175-80. Montreal: Geol. Surv. Can.
21. Fisher DC. 1988. Stratocladistics: integrating stratigraphic and morphologic data in phylogenetic inference. Geol. Soc. Am., Abstr. Prog. 20(7):A186 (Abstr.)
22. Fisher DC. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis and its application in evolutionary paleobiology. In Analytical Paleobiology, ed. NL Gilinsky, PW Signor, Short Courses Paleontol., No. 4, pp. 103-22. Knoxville, TN: Paleontol. Soc.
23. Fisher DC. 1992. Stratigraphic parsimony. See Maddison & Maddison 1992, pp. 124-29
24. Fisher DC. 1994. Stratocladistics: morphological and temporal patterns and their relation to phylogenetic process. In Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature, ed. L Grande, O Rieppel, pp. 133-71. San Diego, CA: Academic
25. Fisher DC. 1997. Stratocladistics and hypothesis choice. J. Vert. Paleont. 17(Suppl. 3):46A (Abstr.)
26. Fisher DC. 1998. Stratigraphic data and phylogenetic hypotheses. Nature [online debate: "Is the fossil record adequate?"] (Dec. 3, 17, 24,1998). www.nature.com/nature/debates/fossil/fossilframeset.html
27. Fisher DC, Bodenbender BE. 2003. Blastoid stratocladistics - Reply to Sumrall and Brochu. J. Paleont. 77:195-98
28. Fisher DC, Foote M, Fox DL, Leighton LR. 2002. Stratigraphy in phylogeny reconstruction - Comment on Smith 2000. J. Paleont. 76:585-86
29. Fisher DC, Fox DL, Leighton LR. 1999. Phylogenies, temporal data, and negative evidence. Science 285:1179, http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/ content/full/285/5431/1179a
30. Foote M. 1996. On the probability of ancestors in the fossil record. Paleobiology 22:141-51
31. Foote M, Sepkoski JJ Jr. 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature 398:415-17
32. Forey P. 1995. Review: Interpreting the hierarchy of nature. J. Vert. Paleont. 15:861-63
33. Fox DL, Fisher DC, Leighton LR. 1999. Reconstructing phylogeny with and without temporal data. Science 284:1816-19
34. Geiger DL, Fitzhugh K, Thacker CE. 2001. Timeless characters: a response to Vermeij 1999. Paleobiology 27:177-78
35. Gingerich PD. 1979. Stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction. See Cracraft & Eldredge 1979, pp. 41-77
36. Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
37. Heyning JE, Thacker CE. 1999. Phylogenies, temporal data, and negative evidence. Science 285:1179
38. Hitchin R, Benton MJ. 1997. Congruence between parsimony and stratigraphy; comparisons of three indices. Paleobiology 23:20-32
39. Huelsenbeck JP. 1997. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny using stratigraphic data. J. Vert. Paleont. 17(Suppl. 3):54A (Abstr.)
40. Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B. 1997. Maximum likelihood estimation of topology and node times using stratigraphic data. Paleobiology 23:174-80
41. Kluge AG, Farris JS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18:1-32
42. Lockwood C. 1998. Stratigraphy and phylogeny. Evol. Anthropol. 6:153-54
43. Maddison WP, Maddison DR, eds. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
44. Marcot JD, Fox DL. 2008. StrataPhy: a new computer program for stratocladistics analysis. Palaeontol. Elect. 11(1, 5A):1-16
45. Marshall CR. 1997a. Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges with nonrandom distributions of fossil horizons. Paleobiology 23:165-73
46. Marshall CR. 1997b. Can Bayes' rule be used to combine stratigraphic and morphologic data in phylogeny reconstruction? J. Vert. Paleont. 17(Suppl. 3):62A (Abstr.)
47. Norell MA, Novacek MJ. 1992. The fossil record and evolution: comparing cladistic and paleontologic evidence for vertebrate history. Science 255:1690-93
48. Norell MA, Novacek MJ. 1997. The Ghost Dance: a cladistic critique of stratigraphic approaches to paleobiology and phylogeny. J. Vert. Paleont. 17(Suppl. 3):67A (Abstr.)
49. Novacek MJ. 2001. Character distributions are phylogenetic evidence. Paleobiology 27:172-73
50. Platnick NI. 1979. Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics. Syst. Zool. 28:537-46
51. Rieppel O. 1997. Falsificationist versus verificationist approaches to history. J. Vert. Paleont. 17(Suppl. 3):71A (Abstr.)
52. Rieppel O, Grande L. 1994. Summary and comments on systematic pattern and evolutionary process. In Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature, ed. L Grande, O Rieppel, pp. 227-55. San Diego, CA: Academic
53. Schaeffer B, Hecht MK, Eldredge N. 1972. Phylogeny and paleontology. In Evolutionary Biology, ed. T Dobzhansky, MK Hecht, WC Steere, 6:31-46. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
54. Scotland RW. 1992. Character coding. In Cladistics: A Practical Course in Systematics, ed. PL Forey, CJ Humphries, IJ Kitching, RW Scotland, DJ Siebert, DM Williams, pp. 14-21. Syst. Assoc. Publ. No. 10. Oxford: Clarendon
55. Siddall ME. 1997. Stratigraphic fit, bias, and a proposed solution. J. Vert. Paleont. 17(Suppl. 3):76A (Abstr.)
56. Simpson GG. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
57. Smith AB. 1994. Systematics and the Fossil Record: Documenting Evolutionary Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell
58. Smith AB. 1998a. What does palaeontology contribute to systematics in a molecular world? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:437-47
59. Smith AB (moderator). 1998b. Is the fossil record adequate? Nature [online debate].www.nature.com/nature/debates/fossil/fossil frameset.html
60. Smith AB. 2000. Stratigraphy in phylogeny reconstruction. J. Paleont. 74:763-66
61. Sober E. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
62. Sumrall CD, Brochu CA. 2003. Resolution, sampling, higher taxa, and assumptions in stratocladistic analysis. J. Paleont. 77:189-94
63. Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods), Version 4.0b7. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
64. Wagner PJ. 1995. Stratigraphic tests of cladistic hypotheses. Paleobiology 21:153-78
65. Wagner PJ. 1997. Predicting amounts of stratigraphic debt and morphologic change. J. Vert. Paleont. 17(Suppl. 3):83A (Abstr.)
66. Wagner PJ. 1998. A likelihood approach for estimating phylogenetic relationships among fossil taxa. Paleobiology 24:430-49
67. Wagner PJ. 2000. Phylogenetic analyses and the fossil record: tests and inferences, hypotheses and models. In Deep Time: Paleobiology's Perspective, ed. DH Erwin, SL Wing. Lawrence, KS: The Paleontol. Soc. Paleobiology 26(Suppl. 4):341-71
68. Wagner PJ. 2002. Testing phylogenetic hypotheses with stratigraphy and morphology-a comment on Smith 2000. J. Paleontol. 76:590-93
69. Wiley EO. 1981. Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York:Wiley