Association between the functional independence measure and Glasgow coma scale regarding the rehabilitation outcomes of traumatic brain injury

Neurosciences

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 41-44

  Al Jarrah, Muhammed D ^a,b   Nazzal, Mahmoud E ^a   Jamous, Mohammed A ^a   Azab, Mohammed A ^a   Maayah, Mikhled F ^a  

^a JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Jordan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58549106368     PISSN: 13196138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Flaada JT, Leibson CL, Mandrekar JN, Diehl N, Perkins PK, Brown AW, et al. Relative risk of mortality after traumatic brain injury: a population-based study of the role of age and injury severity. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24: 435-445.
2. Sherer M, Struchen MA, Yablon SA, Wang Y, Nick TG. Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity: Glasgow Coma Scale, length of coma and post-traumatic amnesia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 678-685.
3. Thompson HJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Wang J, Nathens AB, MacKenzie EJ. Evaluation of the effect of intensity of care on mortality after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 282-290.
4. Von Wild KR; Hannover, Münster TBI Study Council. Posttraumatic rehabilitation and one year outcome following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI): data from the well defined population based German Prospective Study 2000-2002. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008; 101: 55-60.
5. Yap SG, Chua KS. Rehabilitation outcomes in elderly patients with traumatic brain injury in Singapore. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008; 23: 158-163.
6. Woo J, Chan SY, Sum MW, Wong E, Chui YP. In patient stroke rehabilitation efficiency: influence of organization of service delivery and staff numbers. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 86.
7. Linacre JH, Heinemann AW. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 133-143.
8. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 72: 84-89.
9. Blicher JU, Nielsen JF.. Does long-term outcome after intensive inpatient rehabilitation of acquired brain injury depend on etiology? Neuro Rehabilitation 2008; 23: 175-183.
10. Myburgh JA, Cooper DJ, Finfer SR, Venkatesh B, Jones D, Higgins A, et al. Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in Australia and New Zealand. J Trauma 2008; 64: 854-862.
11. Kreutzer JS, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Ripley D, Cifu DX, Rosenthal M, Bushnik T, et al. Charges and lengths of stay for acute and inpatient rehabilitation treatment of traumatic brain injury 1990-1996. Brain Inj 2001; 15: 763-774.
12. Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Rampen AJ, Farace E, Habbema JD, Marshall LF, et al. Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 666-673.
13. Mosenthal AC, Lavery RF, Addis M, Kaul S, Ross S, Marburger R, et al. Isolated traumatic brain injury: age is an independent predictor of mortality and early outcome. J Trauma 2002; 52: 907-911.
14. Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Rosenthal M, Englander J, High W. Functional outcomes of older adults with traumatic brain injury: a prospective, multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 883-888.
15. Heinemann AW, Kirk P, Hastie BA, Semik P, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, et al. Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 143-149.
16. Gray DS, Burnham RS. Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1447-1456.
17. Hart T, Seignourel PJ, Sherer M. A longitudinal study of awareness of deficit after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008; 1: 1.
18. Cowen TD, Meythaler JM, DeVivo MJ, Ivie CS 3rd, Lebow J, Novack TA. Influence of early variables in traumatic brain injury on functional independence measure scores and rehabilitation length of stay and charges. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 797-803.
19. Toschlog EA, MacElligot J, Sagraves SG, Schenarts PJ, Bard MR, Goettler CE, et al. The relationship of Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score to rehabilitative potential in patients suffering traumatic brain injury. Am Surg 2003; 69: 491-497.
20. Whitlock JA Jr, Hamilton BB. Functional outcome after rehabilitation for severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 1103-1112.
21. Sörbo A, Rydenhag B, Sunnerhagen KS, Blomqvist M, Svensson S, Emanuelson I. Outcome after severe brain damage, what makes the difference? Brain Inj 2005; 19: 493-503.
22. Worsowicz GM, Stewart DG, Phillips EM, Cifu DX. Geriatric rehabilitation. 1. Social and economic implications of aging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85 (7 Suppl 3): S3-S6;
23. Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 367-674.