How can we preserve and restore species richness of pollinating insects on agricultural land?

Ecography

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 698-708

  Franzén, Markus ^a   Nilsson, Sven G ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABLE LAND; BEE; BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GRASSLAND; GRAZING; HARVESTING; HERB; MEADOW; MOTH; POLLINATION; POPULATION DENSITY; RED LIST; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPECIES RICHNESS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

APOIDEA; HEXAPODA; KNAUTIA ARVENSIS; LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA; ZYGAENIDAE;

EID: 58549104135     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05110.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Agresti, A. Finlay, B. 1986. Statistical methods for the social sciences. Prentice Hall.
2. Begon, M et al. 2005. Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Blackwell.
3. Biesmeijer, J. et al. 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands Science 313 : 351 354.
4. Borcard, D. et al. 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales Ecology 85 : 1826 1832.
5. Burnham, K. P. Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer.
6. Clausen, H. D. et al. 2001. Factors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark Biol. Conserv. 98 : 167 178.
7. Conrad, K. F. et al. 2004. Long-term population trends in widespread British moths J. Insect Conserv. 8 : 119 136.
8. Dahlström, A. 2006. Betesmarker, djurantal och betestryck 1620-1850 Ph. D. thesis, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
9. Erhardt, A. 1985. Diurnal lepidoptera - sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland J Appl Ecol 22 : 849 861.
10. Fitzpatrick, U. et al. 2007. Rarity and decline in bumblebees - a test of causes and correlates in the Irish fauna Biol. Conserv. 136 : 185 194.
11. Fox, R. et al. 2006. The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Butterfly Conservation.
12. Franzén, M. Nilsson, S. G. 2004. Land use and occurrence of Andrena hattorfiana and other threatened wild bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) at Stenbrohult, Linnaeus' birth place Entomol. Tidskr. 125 : 1 10.
13. Franzén, M. Johannesson, M. 2007. Predicting extinction risk of butterflies and moths (Macrolepidoptera) from distribution patterns and species characteristics J. Insect Conserv. 11 : 367 390.
14. Franzén, M. Nilsson, S. G. 2007. What is the required minimum landscape size for dispersal studies? J. Anim. Ecol. 76 : 1224 1230.
15. Gärdenfors, U. 2005. The 2005 red list of Swedish species. Swedish species information centre.
16. Griebeler, E. M. Seitz, A. 2002. An individual based model for the conservation of the endangered large blue butterfly, Maculinea arion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Ecol. Model. 156 : 43 60.
17. Gustavsson, E. et al. 2007. Land use more than 200 years ago explains current grassland plant diversity in a Swedish agricultural landscape Biol. Conserv. 138 : 47 59.
18. Heikkinen, R. K. et al. 2004. Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural-forest mosaic J. Appl. Ecol. 41 : 824 835.
19. Helm, A. et al. 2006. Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation Ecol. Lett. 9 : 72 77.
20. Herzog, F. et al. 2005. Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 108 : 189 204.
21. Hoekstra, J. M. et al. 2005. Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection Ecol. Lett. 8 : 23 29.
22. Holzschuh, A. et al. 2007. Diversity of flower-visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape composition and regional context J. Appl. Ecol. 44 : 41 49.
23. Jefferson, R. 2005. The conservation management of upland hay meadows in Britain: a review Grass Forage Sci. 60 : 322 331.
24. Jennersten, O. 1984. Flower visitation and pollination efficiency of some north European butterflies Oecologia 63 : 80 89.
25. Kapyla, M. 1978. Foraging distance of small solitary bee, Chelostoma maxillosum (Hym., Megachilidae) Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 44 : 63 64.
26. Karsholt, O. Razowski, J. 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe - a distributional checklist. Apollo Books.
27. Kerr, J. T. et al. 2000. Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem Conserv. Biol. 14 : 1726 1734.
28. Kery, M. Plattner, M. 2007. Species richness estimation and determinants of species detectability in butterfly monitoring programmes Ecol. Entomol. 32 : 53 61.
29. Kevan, P. G. 1983. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28 : 407 453.
30. Kivinen, S. et al. 2006. Multi-species richness of boreal agricultural landscapes: effects of climate, biotope, soil and geographical location J. Biogeogr. 33 : 862 875.
31. Kleijn, D. Sutherland, W. J. 2003. How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J. Appl. Ecol. 40 : 947 969.
32. Kleijn, D. et al. 2001. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes Nature 413 : 723 725.
33. Knop, E. et al. 2006. Effectiveness of the Swiss agri-environment scheme in promoting biodiversity J. Appl. Ecol. 43 : 120 127.
34. Knuth, P. 1899. Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. Engelmann.
35. Kruess, A. Tscharntke, T. 2002. Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity Biol. Conserv. 106 : 293 302.
36. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation - trouble or new paradigm Ecology 74 : 1659 1673.
37. Legendre, P. et al. 2002. The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys Ecography 25 : 601 615.
38. Lindahl, C. 1997. Ängs- och hagmarker i Sverige. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Rep 4819.
39. Linné, C. 1755. Flora Svecica. Svensk flora (in Swedish translation 1986). Forum.
40. Maes, D. van Dyck, H. 2001. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe's worst case scenario? Biol. Conserv. 99 : 263 276.
41. Matheson, A. et al. 1996. The conservation of bees. Academic Press.
42. Mayer, C. 2004. Pollination services under different grazing intensities Int. J. Trop. Ins. Sci. 24 : 95 103.
43. McGeoch, M. A. 1998. The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators Biol. Rev. 73 : 181 201.
44. Meeus, J. H. A. et al. 1990. Agricultural landscapes in Europe and their transformation Landscape Urban Plann. 18 : 289 352.
45. Michener, C. D. 2000. The bees of the World. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
46. Moilanen, A. Hanski, I. 2001. On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology Oikos 95 : 147 151.
47. Moilanen, A. Nieminen, M. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology Ecology 83 : 1131 1145.
48. Myklestad, A. Saetersdal, M. 2004. The importance of traditional meadow management techniques for conservation of vascular plant species richness in Norway Biol. Conserv. 118 : 133 139.
49. Nilsson, S. G. 2002. A method for population studies of butterflies at the landscape scale Entomol. Tidskr. 123 : 193 201.
50. Nilsson, S. G. Baranowski, R. 1997. Habitat predictability and the occurrence of wood beetles in old-growth beech forests Ecography 20 : 491 498.
51. Nilsson, S. G. Nilsson, I. N. 2004. Biodiversity at Linnaeus's birthplace in Stenbrohult, southern Sweden 4. The vascular plant flora and its changes Sv. Bot. Tidskr. 98 : 65 160.
52. Nilsson, S. G. Franzén, M. 2006. Biodiversity at Linnaeus' birthplace in the parish of Stenbrohult, southern Sweden. 5. Butterflies and burnet moths Entomol. Tidskr. 127 : 39 55.
53. Oertli, S. et al. 2005. Ecological and seasonal patterns in the diversity of a species-rich bee assemblage (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes) Eur. J. Entomol. 102 : 53 63.
54. Pettersson, M. W. et al. 2004. Grödor och vildbin i Sverige. Kunskapssammanställning för hållbar utveckling av insektspollinerad matproduktion och biologisk mångfald i jordbrukslandskapet. Artdatabanken and Uppsala Univ.
55. Pollard, E. 1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies Biol. Conserv. 12 : 115 134.
56. Poyry, J. et al. 2004. Restoration of butterfly and moth communities in semi-natural grasslands by cattle grazing Ecol. Appl. 14 : 1656 1670.
57. Rangel, T. F. et al. 2006. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15 : 321 327.
58. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge Univ. Press.
59. Rundlof, M. Smith, H. 2006. The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context J. Appl. Ecol. 43 : 1121 1127.
60. Saarinen, K. Jantunen, J. 2005. Grassland butterfly fauna under traditional animal husbandry: contrasts in diversity in mown meadows and grazed pastures Biodivers. Conserv. 14 : 3201 3213.
61. Sanford, M. P. 2002. Effects of successional old fields on butterfly richness and abundance in agricultural landscapes Gt. Lakes Entomol. 35 : 193 207.
62. Shreeve, T. G. 1992. Monitoring butterfly movements Dennis, R. L. H. The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford Univ. Press 120 138.
63. Sjodin, N. 2007. Pollinator behavioural responses to grazing intensity Biodivers. Conserv. 16 : 2103 2121.
64. Sokal, R. R. Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry. Freeman.
65. Steffan-Dewenter, I. Tscharntke, T. 2001. Succession of bee communities on fallows Ecography 24 : 83 93.
66. Thomas, C. D. 2001. Scale, dispersal and population structure Woiwood, I. P. Insect movement: mechanisms and consequences. CABI 321 336.
67. Thomas, J. A. 1984. The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future Vane-Wright, R. I. Ackery, P. R. The biology of butterflies. Academic Press 333 353.
68. Thomas, J. A. 1995. The conservation of declining butterfly populations in Britain and Europe: Priorities, problems and successes Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 56 : 55 72.
69. van Swaay, C. et al. 2006. Biotope use and trends of European butterflies J. Insect Conserv. 10 : 189 209.
70. Wahlman, H. Milberg, P. 2002. Management of semi-natural grassland vegetation: evaluation of a long-term experiment in southern Sweden Ann. Bot. Fenn. 39 : 159 166.
71. Weibull, A. C. et al. 2000. Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity Ecography 23 : 743 750.
72. Westrich, P. 1990. Die wildbienen Baden-Württembergs. Eugen Ulmer.