A gender inclusive approach to science education

Gender in the Classroom: Foundations, Skills, Methods, and Strategies Across the Curriculum

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 205-223

  Koch, Janice ^a  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58549103422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203824986     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Abir-Am, P., & Outram, D. (1987). Uneasy careers and intimate lives: Women in science, 1789–1979. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. American Association of University Women. (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail on children. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Barman, C. (1997). Students’views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 35(1), 18–24.
4. Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the price for sugar and spice: Shifting the analytical lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 127–144.
5. Hammerich, P., Richardson, G., & Livingston, B. (2000). Sisters in science confronting equity in science and mathematics education. Paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association conference, Seattle, WA.
6. Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning(pp. 542–557). New York: Macmillan.
7. Koch, J. (1998a). Response to Karen Meyer: Reflections on being female in school science. Journal of Research in Teaching Science, 35(4), 473–474.
8. Koch, J. (1998b). Science education: An invitation. In C. Nelson & K. Wilson (Eds.), Seeding the process of multicultural education(pp. 262–272). Minneapolis: Minnesota Inclusiveness Program.
9. Koch, J. (2005). Science stories: Science methods for elementary and middle school teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Teaching Science, 29(4), 331–359.
11. Levine, E. Z., & Orenstein, F. M. (1994). Sugar and spice and puppy dog tails: Gender equity among middle school children. (Eric Document Reproduction No. ED389457)
12. Linn, M. C. (2000). Controversy, the Internet, and deformed frogs: Making science accessible. Who Will do the Science of the Future? (pp. 16–27). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. Meyer, K. (1998). Reflections on being female in school science. Journal of Research in Teaching Science, 35(4), 473–474.
14. Mozans, J. J. (1991). Women in science. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
15. National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Digest of education statistics, tables and figures. Retrieved October 15, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02/ dt129.asp
16. National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: Undergraduate degrees in science and engineering. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/wmpd/sex.htm