Synthesis and evaluation of photoreactive probes to elucidate iodide efflux in thyrocytes

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 825-827

  Derbré, Séverine ^a   Lecat Guillet, Nathalie ^a   Pillon, Florence ^a   Ambroise, Yves ^a  

^a SERVICE DE CHIMIE BIOORGANIQUE ET DE MARQUAGE   (France)

Author keywords

Photoactivatable probe; Photoaffinity labeling; Radioiodide; Sodium iodide symporter

Indexed keywords

3 BIPHENYL 4' YL 5,6 DIHYDROIMIDAZO[2,1 B]THIAZOLE; BIPHENYL DERIVATIVE; IMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; IODIDE; SODIUM IODIDE SYMPORTER; THIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; TRITIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; ISOTOPE LABELING; NONHUMAN; PHOTOREACTIVITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; RAT; SYNTHESIS; THYROID CELL;

ANIMALS; ANIONS; CELL LINE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG DESIGN; IODIDES; LIGHT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; RATS; SYMPORTERS; THIAZOLES; THYROID GLAND; TRITIUM;

EID: 58549090875     PISSN: 0960894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Mazzaferri E.L. In: Braverman L.E., and Utiger R.D. (Eds). The Thyroid: A Fundamental and Clinical Text. 7th ed. (1996), Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 922-945
2. Spitzweg C., and Morris J.C. Clin. Endocrinol. 57 (2002) 559
3. Riesco-Eizaguirre G., and Santisteban P. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 155 (2006) 495
4. For recent examples, see:. Hervé J., Cunha A.S., Liu B., Valogne Y., Longuet M., Boisgard R., Brégerie O., Roux J., Guettier C., Calès P., Tavitian B., Samuel D., Clerc J., Bréchot C., and Faivre J. Hum. Gene Ther. 19 (2008) 915
5. Chen R.F., Li Z.H., Pan Q.H., Zhou J.J., Tang Q.B., Yu F.Y., Zhou Q.B., Wang J., and Chen J.S. Pancreatology 7 (2007) 505
6. Kogai T., Taki K., and Brent G.A. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 13 (2006) 797
7. Lecat-Guillet N., and Ambroise Y. ChemMedChem 3 (2008) 1211
8. Sadakane Y., and Hatanaka Y. Anal. Sci. 22 (2006) 209
9. Dormán G., and Prestwich G.D. Trends Biotechnol. 18 (2000) 64
10. 2O 50:50).
11. f = 0.15 (AcOEt/cHex/MeOH 7:2:0.5).
12. Urawa Y., and Ogura K. Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 271
13. +) m/z 307.0900 found 307.0905.
14. Weber T., and Brunner J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 3084
15. f = 0.20 (DCM/MeOH 9:1).
16. 50) refers to the concentration of compound which induces a response halfway between the lower signal (i.e., signal at low compound concentrations) and maximum signal (50 μM for 1 and 200 μM for 4). Experimental data were fitted by nonlinear regression to the four-parameter sigmoidal Hill equation.
17. For a general procedure of tritiation reactions see:. Ambroise Y., Pillon F., Mioskowski C., Valleix A., and Rousseau B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 20 (2001) 3961
18. 2H]-4 with a moderate isotopic enrichment of 16%. For any unknown reasons, this reaction is subjected to strong isotopic effects.