Hurdle and latent class approaches to serial non-participation in choice models

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 211-226

  Burton, Mike ^a   Rigby, Dan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Choice experiments; GM; Hurdle; Latent class; Non participation

Indexed keywords

CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; CHOICE MODELLING; GENETIC MODIFICATIONS; HURDLE; LATENT CLASS; LATENT CLASS MODEL; NON-PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCE STRUCTURES;

ECONOMICS;

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MODELING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 58549086727     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-008-9225-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csake F(eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, pp 267-281
2. M Ben-Akiva J Swait 1986 The Akaike likelihood ratio index Transp Sci 20 2 133 136
3. PC Boxall WL Adamowicz 2002 Understanding heterogeneous preferences In random utility models: a latent class approach Environ Resour Econ 23 421 446
4. H Bozdogan 1987 Model-selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions Psychometrika 52 345 370
5. J Cairns M van de Pol A Lloyd 2002 Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: being fast and frugal about the future Health Econ 11 655 658
6. KA Clark 2003 Nonparametric model discrimination in international relations J Conflict Resolut 47 1 72 93
7. Consumers Association (2002) GM dilemmas-consumers and genetically modified foods. Policy report, UK Which
8. DA Hensher 2006 How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load J Appl Economet 21 6 861 878
9. D Kahneman A Tversky 1984 Choice, values and frames Am Psychol 39 4 341 350
10. E Lancsar JJ Louviere 2006 Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Econ 15 8 797 811
11. Marris C, Wynne B, Simmons P, Weldon S (2001) Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnologies in Europe. Final report of the PABE research project. http://www.pabe.net
12. MORI (2003) GM food opposition continues, 3 July 2003. http://www.mori.com/polls/2003/gmfood.shtml
13. RA Pollak TJ Wales 1991 The likelihood dominance criterion: a new approach to model selection J Econom 47 2-3 227 242
14. M Rekola 2003 Lexicographic preferences in contingent valuation: a theoretical framework with illustrations Land Econ 79 2 277 291
15. Rigby D, Young T, Burton M (2004) Consumer willingness to pay to reduce GMOs in food and increase the robustness of GM labelling. Report to UK Dept of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
16. Rokeach (1968) Beliefs, attitudes, and values: a theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
17. K Saelensminde 2006 Causes and consequences of lexicographic choices in stated choice studies Ecol Econ 59 3 331 340
18. G Schwarz 1978 Estimating the dimension of a model Ann Stat 6 2 461 464
19. Swait J (2001) Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transp Res Part B, pp 643-666
20. J Swait M Ben-Akiva 1987 Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: mode choice in São Paulo, Brazil Transp Res B 21B 103 115
21. J Swait W Adamowicz 2001 The influence of task complexity on consumer choice, a Latent class model of decision switching strategy J Consumer Res 28 135 148
22. Train (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, NY
23. von Haefen H Roger DM Massey W Adamowicz 2005 Serial non-participation in repeated discrete choice models Am J Agric Econ 87 4 1061 1076