Accuracy assessment of Canadian digital elevation data using ICESat

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 81-86

  Beaulieu, Alexandre ^a   Clavet, Daniel ^a  

^a NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; INTERFEROMETRY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALTIMETRIC DATA; CANADIAN DIGITAL ELEVATION DATUM; CANADIAN SPACE AGENCY; CONFIDENCE LEVELS; EUROPEAN REMOTE SENSING SATELLITES; NEW PRODUCTION; TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION;

REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALTIMETRY; DATA QUALITY; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; INTERFEROMETRY; LIDAR; NATURAL RESOURCE; REMOTE SENSING; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 58449119689     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.75.1.81     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Baek, S., O. Kwoun, A. Braun, Z. Lu, and C.K. Shum, 2005. Digital elevation model of King Edward VII Peninsula, West Antarctica, from SAR interferometry and ICESat laser altimetry, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2(4):413-417.
2. Carabajal, C.C., and D.J. Harding, 2005. ICESat validation of SRTM C-band digital elevation models, Geophysical Research Letters, 32(22), doi:L22S0110.1029/2005GL023957.
3. Deng, Y., 2005. Evaluating Input Data for DEM-Based Environmental Analysis and Classification, Thesis dissertation, University of Southern California, California, 209 p.
4. Fricker, H.A., A. Borsa, B. Minster, C. Carabajal, K. Quinn, and B. Bills, 2005. Assessment of ICESat performance at the Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, Geophysical Research Letters, 32(21), doi:L21S0610.1029/2005GL023423.
5. Martin, C.F., R.H. Thomas, W.B. Krabill, and S.S. Manizade, 2005. ICESat range and mounting bias estimation over precisely-surveyed terrain, Geophysical Research Letters, 32(21), doi:L21S0710.1029/2005GL023800.
6. Schutz, B.E., H.J. Zwally, C.A. Shuman, D. Hancock, and J.P. DiMarzio, 2005. Overview of the ICESat Mission, Geophysical Research Letters, 32(21), doi:L21S0110.1029/2005GL024009.
7. Shuman, C.A., H.J. Zwally, B.E. Schutz, A.C. Brenner, J.P. DiMarzio, V.P. Suchdeo, and H.A. Fricker, 2006. ICESat Antarctic elevation data: Preliminary precision and accuracy assessment, Geophysical Research Letters, 33(7), doi:10.1029/2005GL025227.
8. Thompson, J.A., J.C. Bell, and C.A. Butler, 2001. Digital elevation model resolution: Effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling, Geoderma, 100:67-89.
9. Véronneau, M., R. Duval, and J. Huang, 2006. A gravimetric geoid model as a vertical datum in Canada, Geomatica, 60(2):165-172.
10. Wechsler, S.P., and C.N. Kroll, 2006. Quantifying DEM uncertainty and its effect on topographic parameters, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(9):1081-1090.
11. Zwally, H.J., B. Schutz, W. Abdalati, J. Abshire, C. Bentley, A. Brenner, J. Bufton, J. Dezio, D. Hancock, D. Harding, T. Herring, B. Minster, K. Quinn, S. Palm, J. Spinhirne, and R. Thomas, 2005. ICESat's laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land, Journal of Geodynamics, 34(3-4):405-445.