Are ballot order effects heterogeneous?

Social Science Quarterly

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 71-87

  King, Amy ^b   Leigh, Andrew ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58449110240     PISSN: 00384941     EISSN: 15406237     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00603.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alvarez, R. Michael, Betsy Sinclair Richard L. Hasen. 2006 How Much is Enough? The 'Ballot Order Effect' and the Use of Social Science Research in Election Law Disputes Election Law Journal 5 (1) : 40 56.
2. Australian Electoral Commission. 2004. Candidate's Handbook: Election 2004. Canberra : Australian Electoral Commission.
3. Australian Electoral Commission. 2006. Voting Within Australia - Frequently Asked Questions. Available at 〈 〉.
4. Bakker, Eric A. Arend Lijphart. 1980 A Crucial Test of Alphabetic Voting: The Elections at the University of Leiden, 1973-1978 British Journal of Political Science 10 (4) : 521 25.
5. Brockington, David. 2003 A Low Information Theory of Ballot Position Effect Political Behavior 25 (1) : 1 27.
6. Darcy, Robert Ian McAllister. 1990 Ballot Position Effects Electoral Studies 9 (1) : 5 17.
7. Ho, Daniel E. Kosuke Imai. 2008 Estimating Causal Effects of Ballot Order from a Randomized Natural Experiment: The California Alphabet Lottery, 1978-2002 Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2) : 216 40.
8. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). 1997. Voter Turnout from 1945 to 1997: A Global Report on Political Participation. Stockholm : International IDEA.
9. Jackman, Simon. 2005 Incumbency Advantage and Candidate Quality Pp. 335 47 in Marian Simms John Warhurst, eds., Mortgage Nation: The 2004 Australian Election. Perth, Western Australia : API Network/Curtin University of Technology.
10. Kelley, Jonathan Ian McAllister. 1984 Ballot Paper Cues and the Vote in Australia and Britain: Alphabetic Voting, Sex and Title Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (2) : 452 66.
11. King, Amy Andrew Leigh. 2007. Bias at the Ballot Box? Testing Whether Candidates' Gender Affects Their Vote. Mimeo : Australian National University.
12. Koppell, Jonathan G. S. Jennifer A. Steen. 2004 The Effects of Ballot Position on Election Outcomes Journal of Politics 66 (1) : 267 81.
13. Kopras, Andrew. 1998. Electorate Rankings: Census 1996 (1998 Boundaries). Background Paper 14 1997-98. Parliament House, Canberra : Department of the Parliamentary Library.
14. Kopras, Andrew. 2003. Electorate Rankings: Census 2001 (2003 Boundaries). Research Paper 2 2002-03. Parliament House, Canberra : Department of the Parliamentary Library.
15. Leigh, Andrew. 2005 Economic Voting and Electoral Behavior: How Do Individual, Local and National Factors Affect the Partisan Choice? Economics and Politics 17 (2) : 265 96.
16. Mackerras, Malcolm. 1968 The 'Donkey Vote' Australian Quarterly 40 (4) : 89 92.
17. Mackerras, Malcolm. 1970 Preference Voting and the 'Donkey Vote' Politics 5 (1) : 69 76.
18. Miller, Joanne M. Jon A. Krosnick. 1998 The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (3) : 291 330.
19. Orr, Graeme. 2002 Ballot Order: Donkey Voting in Australia Election Law Journal 1 (4) : 573 78.
20. Shue, Kelly Erzo F. P. Luttmer. 2006. Who Misvotes? The Effect of Differential Cognition Costs on Election Outcomes. NBER Working Papers 12709. Cambridge, MA : NBER.
21. Upton, G. J. G. D. Brook. 1975 The Determination of the Optimum Position on a Ballot Paper Applied Statistics 24 (3) : 279 87.