Mathematical modeling of boundary conditions for laser-molecule time-dependent schrödinger equations and some aspects of their numerical computation - one-dimensional case

Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 110-136

  Lorin, Emmanuel ^a,c   Chelkowski, S ^b   Bandrauk, A D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Lasers; Schr dinger equation; Transparent and artificial boundary conditions

Indexed keywords

EID: 58449094971     PISSN: 0749159X     EISSN: 10982426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/num.20334     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 1 S. Chelkowski, C. Foisy, and A. Bandrauk, Electron‐nuclear dynamics of multiphoton H 2 + dissociative ionization in intense laser fields, Phys Rev A 57 (1998), 1176–1185.
2. 2 M. Defranceschi and C. Le Bris, editors, Mathematical models and methods for ab initio quantum chemistry, Lecture notes in chemistry, Vol. 74, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
3. 3 M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu, A. Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high‐harmonic generation by low frequency laser fields, Phys Rev A 49 (1994), 2117–2132.
4. 4 E. Lorin, S. Chelkowski, and A. Bandrauk, A numerical Maxwell‐Schrödinger model for laser‐matter interaction and propagation, Comput Phys Comm 177 (2007), 908–932.
5. 5 A. Bandrauk, Molecules in laser fields, Chapter 1, M. Dekker, NY, 1994.
6. 6 C. Cohen Tannoudji, J. Dupont‐Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom‐photon interactions, Wiley Interscience, NY, 1992.
7. 7 G. Mechain, A. Couairon, M. Franco, B. Prade, and A. Mysyrowicz, Organizing multiple femtosecond filaments in air, Phys Rev Lett 93 (2004), 035003–1–035003–4.
8. 8 X. Antoine, H. Barucq, and L. Vernhet, High‐frequency asymptotic analysis of a dissipative transmission problem resulting in generalized impedance boundary conditions, Asymptot Anal 26 (2001), 257–283.
9. 9 X. Antoine and C. Besse, Unconditionally stable discretization schemes of non‐reflecting boundary conditions for the one‐dimensional Schrödinger equation, J Comput Phys 188 (2003), 157–175.
10. 10 X. Antoine, C. Besse, and V. Mouysset, Numerical schemes for the simulation of the two‐dimensional Schrödinger equation using non‐reflecting boundary conditions, Math Comp 73 (2004), 1779–1799.
11. 11 L. Di Menza, Transparent and absorbing boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation in a bounded domain, Numer Funct Anal Optim 18 (1997), 759–775.
12. 12 V. A. Baskakov and A. V. Popov, Implementation of transparent boundaries for numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation, Wave Motion 14 (1991), 123–128.
13. 13 S. Jiang and L. Greengard, Fast evaluation of nonreflecting boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation in one dimension, Comput Math Appl 47 (2004), 955–966.
14. 14 R. Kechroud, A. Soulaimani, Y. Saad, and S. Gowda, Preconditioning techniques for the solution of the Helmholtz equation by the finite element method, Math Comput Simulation 65 (2004), 303–321.
15. 15 A. Arnold, M. Ehrhardt, and I. Sofronov, Approximation and fast calculation of non‐local boundary conditions for the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation, R. Kornhube, R. Hoppe, J. Périaux, O. Pironneau, O. Wildlund and J. Xu, editors, Domain decomposition methods in science and engineering, Springer, Berlin, 2005 ; Lecture Notes in Computer Science Engineering, pp. 141–148.
16. 16 C. Zhang, X. Liu, P. Ding, and Y. Qi, The enhancement of efficiency of high‐order harmonic in intense laser field based on asymptotic boundary conditions and symplectic algorithm, J Math Chem 39 (2006), 451–463.
17. 17 A. Iserles, On the numerical quadrature of highly‐oscillating integrals. I. Fourier transforms, IMA J Numer Anal 24 (2004), 365–391.
18. 18 A. Iserles, On the numerical quadrature of highly‐oscillating integrals. II. Irregular oscillators, IMA J Numer Anal 25 (2005), 25–44.
19. 19 E. Persson, K. Schiessl, A. Scrinzi, and J. Burgdörfer, Generation of attosecond unidirectional half‐cycle pulses: Inclusion of propagation effects, Phys Rev A 74 (2006), 013818–1–8.
20. 20 E. Lorin, S. Chelkowski, and A. Bandrauk, A Maxwell‐Schrödinger model for non‐perturbative laser‐molecule interaction and some methods of numerical computation, Proceeding CRM, American Mathematics Society, vol. 41, 2007.