Efficacy of low-calorie, partial meal replacement diet plans on weight and abdominal fat in obese subjects with metabolic syndrome: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial of two diet plans - One high in protein and one nutritionally balanced

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 195-201

  Lee, K ^b   Lee, J ^c   Bae, W K ^a   Choi, J K ^d   Kim, H J ^e   Cho, B ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Wonkwang University   (South Korea)

^d Konkuk University Hospital   (South Korea)

^e Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; INSULIN; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; TRIACYLGLYCEROL; PROTEIN INTAKE;

ABDOMINAL FAT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY FAT DISTRIBUTION; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET THERAPY; DIETARY FIBER; DIETARY INTAKE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EATING HABIT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW CALORY DIET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DIET; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; WEIGHT REDUCTION; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CALORIC RESTRICTION; COMPLICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN INTAKE;

ABDOMINAL FAT; ADIPOSITY; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; CALORIC RESTRICTION; DIET, REDUCING; DIETARY PROTEINS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE;

EID: 58449092594     PISSN: 13685031     EISSN: 17421241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01965.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kim MH, Kim MK, Choi BY, Shin YJ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its association with cardiovascular diseases in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2004 19 : 195 201.
2. Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K et al. Improvement of glucose and lipid metabolism associated with selective reduction of intra-abdominal visceral fat in premenopausal women with visceral fat obesity. Int J Obes 1991 15 : 853 9.
3. Zamboni M, Armellini F, Sheiban I et al. Relation of body fat distribution in men and degree of coronary narrowings in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992 70 : 1135 8.
4. Pouliot MC, Després JP, Lemieux S et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 1994 73 : 460 8.
5. Zamboni M, Armellini F, Cominacini L et al. Obesity and regional body-fat distribution in men: separate and joint relationships to glucose tolerance and plasma lipoproteins. Am J Clin Nutr 1994 60 : 682 7.
6. Lamarche B. Abdominal obesity and its metabolic complications: implications for the risk of ischaemic heart disease. Coron Artery Dis 1998 9 : 473 81.
7. Maison P, Byrne CD, Hales CN, Day NE, Wareham NJ. Do different dimensions of the metabolic syndrome change together over time? Evidence supporting obesity as the central feature. Diabetes Care 2001 24 : 1758 63.
8. Cummings S, Parham ES, Strain GW. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: weight management. J Am Diet Assoc 2002 102 : 1145 55.
9. Heber D, Ashley JM, Wang HJ, Elashoff RM. Clinical evaluation of a minimal intervention meal replacement regimen for weight reduction. J Am Coll Nutr 1994 13 : 608 14.
10. Haynes RB, Kris-Etherton P, McCarron DA et al. Nutritionally complete prepared meal plan to reduce cardiovascular risk factors: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Diet Assoc 1999 99 : 1077 83.
11. Heymsfield SB, van Mierlo CA, van der Knaap HC, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003 27 : 537 49.
12. Huerta S, Li Z, Li HC, Hu MS, Yu CA, Heber D. Feasibility of a partial meal replacement plan for weight loss in low-income patients. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004 28 : 1575 9.
13. Merchant AT, Anand SS, Vuksan V et al. SHARE and SHARE-AP Investigators. Protein intake is inversely associated with abdominal obesity in a multi-ethnic population. J Nutr 2005 135 : 1196 201.
14. Krieger JW, Sitren HS, Daniels MJ, Langkamp-Henken B. Effects of variation in protein and carbohydrate intake on body mass and composition during energy restriction: a meta-regression. Am J Clin Nutr 2006 83 : 260 74.
15. Clifton PM, Keogh JB, Noakes M. Long-term effects of a high-protein weight-loss diet. Am J Clin Nutr 2008 87 : 23 9.
16. Due A, Toubro S, Skov AR, Astrup A. Effect of normal-fat diets, either medium or high in protein, on body weight in overweight subjects: a randomised 1-year trial. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004 28 : 1283 90.
17. Wing RR, Jeffery RW. Food provision as a strategy to promote weight loss. Obes Res 2001 9 (Suppl. 4 271S 5S.
18. Skov AR, Toubro S, Ronn B, Holm L, Astrup A. Randomized trial on protein vs carbohydrate in ad libitum fat reduced diet for the treatment of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999 23 : 528 36.
19. McAuley KA, Hopkins CM, Smith KJ et al. Comparison of high-fat and high-protein diets with a high-carbohydrate diet in insulin-resistant obese women. Diabetologia 2005 48 : 8 16.
20. McAuley KA, Smith KJ, Taylor RW, McLay RT, Williams SM, Mann JI. Long-term effects of popular dietary approaches on weight loss and features of insulin resistance. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006 30 : 342 9.
21. Hegsted M, Linkswiler HM. Long-term effects of level of protein intake on calcium metabolism in young adult women. J Nutr 1981 111 : 553 62.
22. Lutz J. Calcium balance and acid-base status of women as affected by increased protein intake and by sodium bicarbonate ingestion. Am J Clin Nutr 1984 39 : 281 8.
23. Kerstetter JE, Mitnick ME, Gundberg CM et al. Changes in bone turnover in young women consuming different levels of dietary protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999 84 : 1052 5.