Current trends in coronary revascularization

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 61-70

  Dunlay, Shannon M ^a   Rihal, Charanjit S ^a   Sundt, Thoralf M ^a   Gerber, Yariv ^a   Roger, Véronique L ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DRUG ELUTING STENT; ELDERLY CARE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RACE; REVIEW; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

EID: 58449091531     PISSN: 10928464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11936-009-0007-7     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Hawkes AL, Nowak M, Bidstrup B, Speare R: Outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2006, 2: 477-484.
2. Ghali WA, Quan H, Shrive FM, Hirsch GM: Outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01. Can J Cardiol 2003, 19: 774-781.
3. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV: Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts - effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 1996, 334: 216-219.
4. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al.: Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986, 314: 1-6.
5. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al.: Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999, 117: 855-872.
6. Endo M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H: Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2001, 104: 2164-2170.
7. Tashiro T, Morishige N, Iwahashi H, et al.: Coronary artery bypass grafting in DES era. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007, 13: 5-8.
8. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al.: Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: Results from a randomized study. Circulation 2001, 104: 1761-1766.
9. Selvanayagam JB, Petersen SE, Francis JM, et al.: Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: A randomized trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers. Circulation 2004, 109: 345-350.
10. Yokoyama T, Baumgartner FJ, Gheissari A, et al.: Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass in high-risk subgroups. Ann Thorac Surg 2000, 70: 1546-1550.
11. Daemen J, Serruys PW: DrugPeluting stent update 2007: part I. A survey of current and future generation drug-eluting stents: Meaningful advances or more of the same? Circulation 2007, 116: 316-328.
12. Shuchman M: Trading restenosis for thrombosis? New questions about drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 2006, 355: 1949-1952.
13. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al.: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40: 1366-1374.
14. Hahn J, Lessard D, Yarzebski J, et al.: A community-wide perspective into changing trends in the utilization of diagnostic and interventional procedures in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2007, 153: 594-605.
15. Lucas FL, DeLorenzo MA, Siewers AE, Wennberg DE: Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993-2001. Circulation 2006, 113: 374-379.
16. Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al.: Management patterns in relation to risk stratification among patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167: 1009-1016.
17. Alter DA, Stukel TA, Newman A: Proliferation of cardiac technology in Canada: A challenge to the sustainability of Medicare. Circulation 2006, 113: 380-387.
18. Gogo PB Jr, Dauerman HL, Mulgund J, et al.: Changes in patterns of coronary revascularization strategies for patients with acute coronary syndromes (from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative). Am J Cardiol 2007, 99: 1222-1226.
19. Ko DT, Wang Y, Alter DA, et al.: Regional variation in cardiac catheterization appropriateness and baseline risk after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51: 716-723.
20. Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KA, et al.: Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2005, 293: 2908-2917.
21. Ulrich MR, Brock DM, Ziskind AA: Analysis of trends in coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention rates in Washington state from 1987 to 2001. Am J Cardiol 2003, 92: 836-839.
22. Gerber Y, Rihal CS, Sundt TM, et al.: Coronary revascularization in the community. A population-based study, 1990 to 2004. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50: 1223-1229.
23. Sibbald B: Declining CABG rate means fewer jobs for surgeons. CMAJ 2005, 173: 583-584.
24. Weerasinghe DP, Wolfenden HD, Yusuf F: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery trends in New South Wales, Australia. Public Health 2008, 122: 151-160.
25. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, et al.: Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000. N Engl J Med 2007, 356: 2388-2398.
26. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, et al.: Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 2005, 352: 2174-2183.
27. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al.: Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008, 358: 331-341.
28. Spaulding C, Daemen J, Boersma E, et al.: A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med 2007, 356: 989-997.
29. Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, et al.: Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: A collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 2007, 370: 937-948.
30. Hannan EL, Racz M, Holmes DR, et al.: Comparison of coronary artery stenting outcomes in the eras before and after the introduction of drug-eluting stents. Circulation 2008, 117: 2071-2078.
31. Groeneveld PW, Matta MA, Greenhut AP, Yang F: Drugeluting compared with bare-metal coronary stents among elderly patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51: 2017-2024.
32. Bearden D, Allman R, McDonald R, et al.: Age, race, and gender variation in the utilization of coronary artery bypass surgery and angioplasty in SHEP. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994, 42: 1143-1149.
33. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM: Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991, 325: 221-225.
34. Alexander KP, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al.: Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients > or = 80 years: Results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 35: 731-738.
35. Lichtman JH, Kapoor R, Wang Y, et al.: Temporal trends of outcomes for nonagenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, 1993 to 1999. Am J Cardiol 2007, 100: 1630-1634.
36. Northrup WF 3rd, Emery RW, Nicoloff DM, et al.: Opposite trends in coronary artery and valve surgery in a large multisurgeon practice, 1979-1999. Ann Thorac Surg 2004, 77: 488-495.
37. Malenka DJ, Wennberg DE, Quinton HA, et al.: Genderrelated changes in the practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in Northern New England from 1994 to 1999. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40: 2092-2101.
38. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Killian JM, et al.: Sex and classic risk factors after myocardial infarction: A community study. Am Heart J 2006, 152: 461-468.
39. Singh M, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, et al.: Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions a 25-year, single-center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51: 2313-2320.
40. Ko DT, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al.: Regional differences in process of care and outcomes for older acute myocardial infarction patients in the United States and Ontario, Canada. Circulation 2007, 115: 196-203.
41. Harrold LR, Esteban J, Lessard D, et al.: Narrowing gender differences in procedure use for acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the Worcester heart attack study. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18: 423-431.
42. Conigliaro J, Whittle J, Good CB, et al.: Understanding racial variation in the use of coronary revascularization procedures: The role of clinical factors. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160: 1329-1335.
43. Giles WH, Anda RF, Casper ML, et al.: Race and sex differences in rates of invasive cardiac procedures in US hospitals. Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Arch Intern Med 1995, 155: 318-324.
44. Gillum RF, Gillum BS, Francis CK: Coronary revascularization and cardiac catheterization in the United States: Trends in racial differences. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 29: 1557-1562.
45. Kressin NR, Petersen LA: Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures: Review of the literature and prescription for future research. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135: 352-366.
46. Peterson ED, Shaw LK, DeLong ER, et al.: Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures. Are the differences real? Do they matter? N Engl J Med 1997, 336: 480-486.
47. Gillum RF: Coronary revascularization in older women and men in the United States: Trends in ethnic differences. Am Heart J 2004, 147: 418-424.
48. Jha AK, Fisher ES, Li Z, et al.: Racial trends in the use of major procedures among the elderly. N Engl J Med 2005, 353: 683-691.
49. Okelo S, Taylor AL, Wright JT Jr, et al.: Race and the decision to refer for coronary revascularization: The effect of physician awareness of patient ethnicity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 38: 698-704.