Periodicity, persistence, and collapse in host–parasitoid systems with egg limitation

Journal of Biological Dynamics

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 273-287

  Schreiber, Sebastian J ^a  

^a Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Egg limitation; Host parasitoid interactions; Permanence; Search limitation; Spatial heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EGG; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INSECT; PARASITOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; EGGS; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; INSECTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 58449091040     PISSN: 17513758     EISSN: 17513766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17513750701450235     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Beddington, J. R., Free, C. A., and Lawton, J. H., 1975. Dynamics complexity in predator–prey models framed in difference equations. Nature, 225:58–60.
2. Comins, H. N., and Wellings, P. W., 1985. Density-related parasitoid sex-ratio:influence on host–parasitoid dynamics. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 54:583–594.
3. Hassell, M. P., 2026. “ The dynamics of arthropod predator–prey systems ”. In Monographs in Population Biology, Vol. 13, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. MR 80d:9
4. May, R. M., 1978. Host–parasitoid systems in patch environments:a phenomenological model. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 47:833–843.
5. May, R. M., Hassell, M. P., Anderson, R. M., and Tonkyn, D. W., 1981. Density dependence in host–parasitoid models. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 50:855–865.
6. Schreiber, S. J., Fox, L. R., and Getz, W. M., 2000. Coevolution of contrary choices in host–parasitoid systems. The American Naturalist,:637–648.
7. Schreiber, S. J., Fox, L. R., and Getz, W. M., 2002. Parasitoid sex allocation affects coevolution of patch selection in host–parasitoid systems. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4:701–718.
8. van Baalen, M., and Sabelis, M. W., 1993. Coevolution of patch selection strategies of predator and prey and the consequences for ecological stability. The American Naturalist, 142:646–670.
9. Getz, W. M., and Mills, N. J., 1996. Host–parasitiud coexistence and egg-limited encounter rates. The American Naturalist, 148:333–347.
10. Heimpel, G. E., and Rosenheim, J. A., 1998. Egg limitation in parasitoids:a review of the evidence and a case study. Biological Control, 11:160–168.
11. Jervis, M. A., 2001. Life-history strategies in parasitoid wasps:a comparative analysis of ‘ovigeny’. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70:442–458.
12. Lane, S. D., Mills, N. J., and Getz, W. M., 1999. The effects of parasitoid fecundity and host taxon on the biological control of insect pests:the relationship between theory and data. Ecological Entomology, 24:181–190.
13. Shea, K., Nisbet, R. M., Murdoch, W. W., and Yoo, H. J., 1996. The effect of egg limitation on stability in insect host–parasitoid population models. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 65:743–755.
14. Hassell, M. P., and May, R. M., 1973. Stability in insect host–parasite models. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 42:693–726.
15. Rogers, D. J., 1972. Random search and insect population models. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 41:369–383.
16. Mills, N. J., 1996. Modelling the biological control of insect pests:a review of host–parasitoid models. Ecological Modelling, 92:121–143.
17. Nicholson, A. J., and Bailey, V. A., The balance of animal populations. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. pp. 551–598.
18. Hassell, M. P., 1969. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature, 223:1133–1137.
19. Hochberg, M. E., and Holt, R. D., 1995. Refuge evolution and the population dynamics of coupled host–parasitoid associations. Evolutionary Ecology, 9:633–661.
20. Schreiber, S. J., Host–parasitoid dynamics of a generalized Thompson model. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 52719–732. MR MR223554
21. Thompson, W. R., 1924. La theory mathematique de l’action des parasites entomophages et le facteur du hassard. Annales Faculté des Sciences de Marseille, 2:69–89.
22. Hassell, M. P., May, R. M., Pacala, S. W., and Chesson, P. L., 1991. The persistence of host–parasitoid associations in patchy environments. i. A general criterion. The American Naturalist, 138:568–583.
23. k topology. Annals of Mathematics (2), 157:1–43. MR MR1954263 (2004b:37052)
24. Thunberg, H., 2001. Periodicity versus chaos in one-dimensional dynamics. SIAM Reviews, 43:3–30. (electronic). MR MR1854645 (200f:37069)
25. Schreiber, S. J., 2006. Persistence despite perturbations for interacting populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 242:844–52.
26. Singer, D., 1978. Stable orbits and bifurcation of maps of the interval. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35:260–267.
27. Urbanski, M., and Wolf, C., 2004. SRB measures for Axiom A endomorphisms. Mathematical Research Letters, 11:785–797. MR MR2106242 (2006k:37052)
28. r robust permanence. Journal of Differential Equations,:400–426.
29. Garay, B. M., and Hofbauer, J., 2003. Robust permanence for ecological differential equations, minimax, and discretizations. SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 34:1007–1039. (electronic). MR MR2001657 (2004i:37027)
30. Pugh, C. C., and Shub, M., 1989. Ergodic attractors. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 312:1–54.