Long-term results of scleral buckling using a microsurgical approach;Langzeitresultate nach mikrochirurgischer skleraeindellender ablatiochirurgie

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 225, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1055-1061

  Falkner Radler, Christiane Isolde ^a   Binder, S ^a  

^a KRANKENANSTALT RUDOLFSTIFTUNG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Microsurgery; Retina; Retinal detachment; Scleral buckle surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DETERIORATION; DIPLOPIA; EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MICROSURGERY; MUSCLE HYPOTONIA; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PSEUDOPHAKIA; REOPERATION; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETINA MACULA CYSTOID EDEMA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCLERA BUCKLING PROCEDURE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MICROSCOPE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; WOUND DEHISCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GERMANY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RETINAL DETACHMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCLERAL BUCKLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58449088443     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027489     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H et al. Anatomic and vuisaul outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation - report no. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1421-1429
2. Ambati J, Arroyo JG. Postoperative complications of scleral buckling surgery. Int Ophtalmol Clin 2000; 40: 175-185
3. Azad RV, Chanana B, Sharma YR et al. Primary vitrectomy versus conventional retinal detachment surgery in phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007; 85: 540-545
4. Bonnet M. Microsurgery for retinal detachment repair. Dev Ophthalmol 1987; 14: 5-10
5. Bopp S, Böhm K. Reamotio mehr als 1 Jahr nach primär erfolgreicher Ablatiochirurgie: Ursachen und Häufigkeit. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkunde 2008; 225: 227-235
6. Brazitikos PD, Androudi S, Christen WG et al. Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial. Retina 2005; 25: 957-64
7. Foster RE, Meyers SM. Recurrent retinal detachment more than 1 year after reattachment Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1821-1827
8. Girard P, Karpouzas I. Visual acuity after scleral buckling surgery. Opthalmologica 1995; 209: 323-328
9. Girard P, Mayer F, Karpouzas I. Late recurrence of retinal detachment. Opthalmologica 1997; 211: 247-250
10. Han DP, Mohsin NC, Guse CE et al. Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126: 658-668
11. Hassan TS, Sarrafizadeh R, Ruby AJ et al. The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 146-152
12. Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group.. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 2124-2154
13. Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Friedrichs V et al. Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1996; 4: 561-568
14. Ho CL, Chen KJ, See LC. Selection of scleral buckling for primary retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 2002; 216: 33-39
15. Kwok AKH, Cheng LL, Tse MWI et al. Outcomes of primary retinal detachment in myopes of five or more diopters. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2002; 33: 188-194
16. Liu F, Meyer CH, Mennel S et al. Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Opthalmologica 2006; 220: 174-180
17. Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M et al. Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 538-549
18. Ranta P, Kivelä T. Functional and anatomic outcome of retinal detachment surgery in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1432-1440
19. Rodriguez FJ, Lewis H, Kreiger AE et al. Scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachement associated with severe myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 595-600
20. Roider J, Hoerauf H, Hager A et al. Konventionelle Ablatiochirurgie oder primäre Vitrektomie bei komplizierten Lochsituationen. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 887-891
21. Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Vekatraman A et al. Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1734-1742
22. Schwartz SG, Kuhl DP, Mc Pherson AR et al. Twenty year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 325-329
23. Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV et al. Functional outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scad 2005; 83: 293-297
24. Sivkova N, Kreissig I. Rhegmatogene PVR-Ablatio: Langzeitergebnisse nach extraokularer minimaler Plombenchirurgie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002; 219: 519-522
25. Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 2033-2040