Smectic liquid crystals in random environments

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 206-257

  Toner, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5844286064     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.206     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. E. Granato and J. M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. B 33, 6533 (1986);
2. E. GranatoJ. M. KosterlitzPhys. Rev. Lett. 62, 823 (1989).
3. J. Toner and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B 41, 632 (1990).
4. M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1415 (1989);
5. D. S. Fisher, M. P. A. Fisher, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 43, 130 (1991);
6. Phys. Rev. BC. Ebner and D. Stroud, 31, 165 (1985);
7. Phys. Rev. BD. A. Huse and S. Seung, 42, 1059 (1990);
8. G. Blatter, M.V. Feigel’man, V.B. Geshkenbein, A.I. Larkin, and V.M. Vinokur, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125 (1994).
9. G. Grüner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129 (1988).
10. M. Chan, N. Mulders, and J. Reppy, Phys. Today 49 (8), 30 (1996).
11. A. B. Harris, J. Phys. C 7, 1671 (1974);
12. J. T. Chayes, L. Chayes, D. S. Fisher, and T. Spencer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2999 (1986).
13. A. I. Larkin and Yu. N. Ovchinikov, J. Low Temp. Phys. 34, 409 (1979).
14. J. L. Cardy and S. Ostlund, Phys. Rev. B 25, 6899 (1982).
15. T. Giamarchi and Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1530 (1994).
16. M.J.P. Gingras and D.A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 53, 15 193 (1996).
17. D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1964 (1997).
18. For a review of the experimental status also see (especially Bellini et al., Chap. 19, and Rappaport et al., Chap. 20 in) Liquid Crystals in Complex Geometries, edited by G. P. Crawford and S. Z̆umer (Taylor & Francis, London, 1996).
19. P. G. de Gennes, Solid State Commun. 10, 753 (1972);
20. P. G. de GennesMol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 21, 49 (1973).
21. P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Clarendon, Oxford, 1993).
22. B. I. Halperin, T. Lubensky, and S. K. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 292 (1974);
23. J. Chen, T. C. Lubensky, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 17, 4274 (1978);
24. B. I. Halperin and T. C. Lubensky, Solid State Commun. 14, 997 (1973);
25. L. Radzihovsky, Europhys. Lett. 29, 227 (1995).
26. J. Toner, Phys. Rev. B 26, 462 (1982).
27. L. Radzihovsky and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4214 (1997).
28. L. Radzihovsky and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4414 (1997).
29. T. Bellini, N. A. Clark, C. D. Muzny, L. Wu, C. W. Garland, D. W. Schaefer, and B. J. Oliver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 788 (1992);
30. Phys. Rev. Lett.T. Bellini, N. A. Clark, and D. W. Schaefer, 74, 2740 (1995).
31. N.A. Clark, T. Bellini, R. M. Malzbender, B. N. Thomas, A. G. Rappaport, C. D. Muzny, D. W. Schaefer, and L. Hrubesh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3505 (1993).
32. L. Wu, B. Zhou, C. W. Garland, T. Bellini, and D. W. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. E 51, 2157 (1995).
33. Z. Kutnjak and C. W. Garland, Phys. Rev. E 55, 488 (1997).
34. We expect the disorder to be short-range correlated in space. One might expect that the continuity of the random aerogel strands should lead to correlated disorder, with a wave vector-dependent variance that possibly diverges as (Formula presented). However, at the NA transition the order parameter is the Fourier transform of the density at a large wave vector q far from (Formula presented). We therefore expect that the disorder that couples to such an order parameter will be short-range correlated in space.
35. G. Grinstein and R. A. Pelcovits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 856 (1981);
36. Phys. Rev. Lett.L. Golubovic and Z. G. Wang, 69, 2535 (1992).
37. For example, gauge glasses. L. Radzihovsky and J. Toner (unpublished).
38. L. Radzihovsky and J. Toner (unpublished).
39. X.I. Wu, W.I. Goldburg, M. X. Liu, and J. Z. Xue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 470 (1992).
40. J. Villain and J. F. Fernandez, Z. Phys. B 54, 416 (1986).
41. Our conclusion about the spatial algebraic decay of the smectic order parameter correlations only follows from the logarithmic growth of the layer displacement after a “Debye-Waller factor” approximation which neglects higher order (beyond second) phonon cumulants.
42. M. Benzekri, J. P. Marcerou, H. T. Nguyen, and J. C. Rouillon, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9032 (1990);
43. M. Benzekri, T. Claverie, J. P. Marcerou, and J. C. Rouillon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2480 (1992);
44. F. Beaubois, T. Claverie, J. P. Marcerou, J. C. Rouillon, and H. T. Nguyen, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5566 (1997);
45. Phys. Rev. EC. W. Garland, G. Nounesis, M. J. Young, and R. J. Birgeneau, 47, 1918 (1993);
46. Phys. Rev. EC. W. Garland and G. Nounesis, 49, 2964 (1994).
47. It appears that in most bulk (pure) smectics it is difficult to get into this mean-field regime, with the liquid crystal freezing before it is reached. We thank Carl Garland and Germano Iannacchione for pointing this out to us.
48. L. Radzihovsky and B. Ward (unpublished);B. Ward, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado (1999).
49. A.J. Bray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 1413 (1974).
50. S. G. Dunn and T. C. Lubensky, J. Phys. (Paris) 42, 1201 (1981);
51. T. C. Lubensky, S. G. Dunn, and J. Isaacson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1609 (1981).
52. T. C. Lubensky, J. Chim. Phys. Phys.-Chim. Biol. 80, 31 (1983).
53. L. Radzihovsky (unpublished).
54. We have taken the distribution of disorder to be Gaussian, which relies on the assumption that, at long length scales, universality will ensure that small deviations of the true distribution from a Gaussian are not important, as long as the distribution is short-ranged, which we expect on physical grounds.
55. We use the expression “line up” to designate a fixed preferred orientation of the nematogen axis relative to the local aerogel strand axis (or more generally with the local tangent to the surface of the confining structure), which might vary from parallel to perpendicular (homeotropic) alignment, depending on the system. It is easy to show that for isotropic confining structures, with no orientational order, e.g., aerogel, our results are independent of these microscopic details. However, for smectics confined, instead, in orientationally ordered structures, studied in Ref. 67, parallel and homeotropic alignments lie in different universality classes.
56. S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, J. Phys. (Paris) 5, 965 (1975).
57. K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, Phys. Rep., Phys. Lett. 12C, 77 (1977).
58. The choice of the field-rescaling exponent (Formula presented) is of course arbitrary. If, instead of the convenient (Formula presented) choice, we left it arbitrary, then to return the Hamiltonian to the form it had before the RG transformation, we would also have to allow the smectic wave vector (Formula presented) to flow as (Formula presented). In the end the flow equations for the dimensionless coupling constants would involve (Formula presented) and would be independent of the choice of (Formula presented).
59. Gauge invariance of the nonlinearities in the de Gennes model requires that even when dislocation loops are included K does not have any diagrammatic renormalization. This strict nonrenormalization of K can also be seen by studying the transition from the low-temperature side, in terms of the dislocation-loop unbinding picture (Refs. 4816). In this formulation, K is the coefficient of an operator quadratic in u, that is nonanalytic in wave vector, while the nonlinearities are all analytic in wave vector. Since it is impossible for these analytic nonlinearities to generate terms that are nonanalytic in k, there is strictly no renormalization of K, even in the presence of dislocation loops that drive the bulk modulus B to zero.
60. J. V. José, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 16, 1217 (1977).
61. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973);
62. V. L. Berezinskii, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 59, 907 (1970) [Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 493 (1971)];
63. B. I. Halperin and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 121 (1978);
64. D. R. Nelson and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B 19, 2457 (1979);
65. Phys. Rev. BA. P. Young, 19, 1855 (1979).
66. P. E. Lammert, D. Rokhsar, and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1650 (1993);
67. P. E. LammertD. RokhsarJ. TonerPhys. Rev. E 52, 1778 (1995).
68. T. Banks, R. J. Myerson, and J. Kogut, Nucl. Phys. B 129, 493 (1977);
69. Nucl. Phys. BP. R. Thomas and M. Stone, 144, 513 (1978);
70. M. Peskin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 113, 122 (1978).
71. P. Pershan, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 1590 (1973).
72. D. R. Nelson and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. B 24, 363 (1981).
73. This choice of having the nonsingular part of (Formula presented) minimize the elastic Hamiltonian is not necessary, but is convenient because for such a choice the dislocation degrees of freedom (Formula presented) decouple from the phonons u; see Appendix C.
74. J. Villain, J. Phys. (Paris) 36, 581 (1975).
75. D. Boyanovsky and J. Cardy, Phys. Rev. B 25, 7058 (1982).
76. D. R. Nelson and L. Peliti, J. Phys. (Paris) 48, 1085 (1987).
77. J. A. Aronovitz and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2634 (1988);
78. Phys. Rev. Lett.J. Toner, 62, 905 (1989).
79. P. Le Doussal and L. Radzihovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1209 (1992).
80. Analogous elastic anharmonicities are of course also present in ordinary solids and other periodic elastic media. However, because of the stiffer, quadratic (Formula presented) (as opposed to quartic (Formula presented) dispersion of these systems, the anharmonicities are irrelevant in the renormalization group sense.
81. D.S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 31, 7233 (1985).
82. O. Narayan and D.S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11 520 (1992).
83. All (Formula presented) are finite despite the vanishing of (Formula presented) as (Formula presented) and (Formula presented).
84. D. S. Fisher used a real space renormalization group transformation to demonstrate the stability of the three-dimensional random-field XY model to vortex unbinding (Ref. 11), thereby arguing for the stability of the vortex “Bragg” glass phase in weakly disordered superconductors (Ref. 910).
85. In Sec. VIII, for a periodic-disorder-only model (strictly only valid for (Formula presented), we explicitly demonstrated that this conclusion remained valid up to logarithmic corrections even in the presence of nonlinear elasticity.
86. B. Zhou, G.S. Iannacchione, C.W. Garland, and T. Bellini, Phys. Rev. E 55, 2962 (1997).
87. G.S. Iannacchione, C.W. Garland, J. Mang, and T. Rieker, Phys. Rev. E 58, 5966 (1998);R. L. Leheny and C. W. Garland (private communication).
88. G. S. Iannacchione and D. Finotello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2094 (1992);
89. G. S. IannacchioneD. FinotelloPhys. Rev. E 50, 4780 (1994).
90. G. S. Iannacchione, S. Qian, D. Finotello, and F. Aliev, Phys. Rev. E 56, 554 (1997);
91. G. S. Iannacchione, G. P. Crawford, S. Zumer, J. W. Doane, and D. Finotello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2595 (1993);
92. G. S. IannacchioneG. P. CrawfordS. ZumerJ. W. DoaneD. FinotelloPhys. Rev. E 53, 2402 (1996).
93. T. Bellini, N. Clark, L. Radzihovsky, and J. Toner (unpublished).
94. H. Haga and C. W. Garland, Liq. Cryst. 22, 275 (1997);
95. H. HagaC. W. GarlandMol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Sci. Technol. 23, 645 (1997).
96. B. Jacobsen, K. Saunders, L. Radzihovsky, and J. Toner (unpublished).
97. We thank Tom Lubensky for pointing out to us the applicability of our theory to this system.