Daily energy expenditure of singing great reed warblers acrocephalus arundinaceus

Journal of Avian Biology

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 384-388

  Hasselquist, Dennis ^a   Bensch, Staffan ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGETICS; HONEST SIGNALING; INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; INTRASEXUAL INTERACTION; METABOLISM; SONGBIRD;

ACROCEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS; AVES;

EID: 58349121905     PISSN: 09088857     EISSN: 1600048X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04427.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. - Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Berger, M. and Hart, J. S. 1974. Physiology and energetics of flight. - In: Farner, D. S. and King, J. R. (eds). Avian biology, Vol. 4. Academic Press, New York, pp. 260-415.
3. Catchpole, C. K. 1986. Song repertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 439-445.
4. Chappell, M. A., Zuk, M., Kwan, T. H. and Johnsen, T. S. 1995. Energy cost of an avian vocal display: crowing in red junglefowl. - Anim. Behav. 49: 255-257.
5. Drent, R. H. and Daan, S. 1980. The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. - Ardea 68: 225-252.
6. Eberhardt, L. S. 1994. Oxygen consumption during singing by male Carolina wrens (Thyothorus ludovicianus). - Auk 111: 124-130.
7. Eberhardt, L. S. 1996. Energy expenditure during singing: a reply to Gaunt et al. - Auk 113: 721-723.
8. Gaunt, A. S., Bucher, T. L., Gaunt, S. L. L. and Baptista, L. F. 1996. Is singing costly? -Auk 113: 718-721.
9. Gil, D. and Gahr, M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 133-141.
10. Hasselquist, D. 1998. Polygyny in the great reed warbler: a longterm study of factors contributing to male fitness. - Ecology 79: 2376-2390.
11. Hasselquist, D. and Bensch, S. 1991. Trade-off between mate guarding and mate attraction in the polygynous great reed warbler. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 28: 187-193.
12. Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. and Ottosson, U. 1993. Diurnal song pattern in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. - Ornis Svecica 3: 125-136.
13. Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. and von Schantz, T. 1996. Correlation between song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. - Nature 381: 229-232.
14. Horn, A. G., Leonard, M. L. and Weary, D. M. 1995. Oxygen consumption during crowing by roosters: talk is cheap. - Anim. Behav. 50: 1171-1175.
15. Hutchinson, J. M. C. and McNamara, J. M. 2000. Ways to test stochastic dynamic programming models empirically. - Anim. Behav. 59: 665-676.
16. Hutchinson, J. M. C., McNamara, J. M. and Cuthill, I. C. 1993. Song, sexual selection, starvation and strategic handicaps. - Anim. Behav. 45: 1153-1177.
17. Lambrechts, M. M. 1996. Organization of bird song and constraints on performance. - In: Kroodsma, D. E. and Miller, E. H. (eds). Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca and London, pp. 305-320.
18. Lifson, N. and McClintock, R. 1966. Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. -J. Theor. Biol. 12: 46-74.
19. Masman, D., Dijkstra, C., Daan, S. and Bult, A. 1989. Energetic limitation of avian parental effort: Field experiments in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). -J. Evol. Biol. 2: 435-455.
20. McKechnie, A. E. and Wolf, B. O. 2004. The allometry of avian basal metabolic rate: good predictions need good data. - Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 77: 502-521.
21. McNamara, J. M., Mace, R. H. and Houston, A. I. 1987. Optimal daily routines of singing and foraging in a bird singing to attract a mate. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 399-405.
22. Nilsson, J.-Å. 2002. Metabolic consequences of hard work. - Proc. R. Soc. B 269: 1735-1739.
23. Oberweger, K. and Goller, F. 2001. The metabolic cost of birdsong production. - J. Exp. Biol. 204: 3379-3388.
24. Peterson, C. C., Nagy, K. A. and Diamond, J. 1990. Sustained metabolic scope. -Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 2324-2328.
25. Speakman, J. R. 1997. Doubly labelled water. - Chapman and Hall, London.
26. Thomas, R. J. 2002. The cost of singing in nightingales. -Anim. Behav. 63: 959-966.
27. Thomas, R. J. and Cuthill, I. C. 2002. Body mass regulation and the daily singing routines of European robins. - Anim. Behav. 63: 285-293.
28. Tinbergen, J. M. and Dietz, M. W. 1994. Parental energy expenditure during brood rearing in the great tit (Parus major) in relation to body mass, temperature, food availability and clutch size. - Funct. Ecol. 8: 563-572.
29. Vehrencamp, S. L. 2001. Is song type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions? - Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 2013-2019.
30. Vehrencamp, S. L., Bradbury, J. W. and Gibson, R. M. 1989. The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. - Anim. Behav. 38: 885-896.
31. Ward, S. and Slater, P. J. B. 2005. Raised thermoregulatory costs at exposed song posts increase the energetic cost of singing for willow warblers Phylloscopus trochilus. -J. Avian Biol. 36: 280-286.
32. Ward, S., Lampe, H. M. and Slater, P. J. B. 2004. Singing is not energetically demanding for pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. - Behav. Ecol. 15: 477-484.
33. Ward, S., Speakman, J. R. and Slater, P. J. B. 2003. The energy cost of song in the canary, Serinus serinus. -Anim. Behav. 66: 893-902.
34. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate choice: a selection for a handicap. - J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205-214.