Use of Optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 52-55

  Khandhadia, S ^a   Madhusudhana, K C ^b   Kostakou, A ^c   Forrester, J V ^d   Newsom, R S B ^a  

^a SOUTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL BERKSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Second Department of Ophthalmiatrion   (Greece)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NURSE PRACTITIONER; OPTOMAP IMAGING SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETINA DISEASE; RETINA INJURY; RETINA TEAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; RETINAL DETACHMENT; RETINAL PERFORATIONS; SCLERA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 58349116026     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.148072     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Friberg TRP. Non-mydriatic panoramic fundus imaging using a non-contact scanning laser-based system. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2003;34:488-97.
2. Cheng SC, Yap MK, Goldschmidt E, et al. Use of the Optomap with lid retraction and its sensitivity and specificity. Clin Exp Optom 2008;91:373-8.
3. Revelli EJ, Lambreghts K, Barker FM. A multi-center, open, non-randomized comparison trial of standard and steered Optomap retinal exam and binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:3282.
4. Mackenzie PJ, Russell M, Ma PE, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Optos Optomap for detecting peripheral retinal lesions. Retina 2007;27:1119-24.
5. Optus. Optos V2 application-user guide. Dunfermline: Optos, 2001.