Movement behavior in response to landscape structure: The role of functional grain

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 39-51

  Romero, Susan ^a,b   Campbell, James F ^c   Nechols, James R ^a   With, Kimberly A ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Grain size; Perceptive resolution; Red flour beetle; Search strategy; Space use; Tribolium castaneum

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DISPERSAL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT TYPE; HETEROGENEITY; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MOVEMENT; PATCH SIZE; PREDICTION; SPACE USE;

ANIMALIA; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; TRIBOLIUM (BEETLE); TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM;

EID: 58349102695     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-008-9278-8     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. H Andrén 1994 Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review Oikos 71 355 366 10.2307/3545823
2. M Baguette H Van Dyck 2007 Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal Landsc Ecol 22 1117 1129 10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4
3. Bell WJ (1991) Searching behaviour: the behavioural ecology of finding resources. Chapman and Hall, London
4. AB Bond 1980 Optimal foraging in a uniform habitat: the search mechanism of the green lacewing Anim Behav 28 10 19 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80003-0
5. JF Campbell C Runnion 2003 Patch exploitation by female red flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum J Insect Sci 3 20
6. L Conradt TJ Roper 2006 Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal Ecology 87 125 132 10.1890/05-0413
7. L Conradt PA Zollner TJ Roper K Frank CD Thomas 2003 Foray search: an effective systematic dispersal strategy in fragmented landscapes Am Nat 161 905 915 10.1086/375298
8. Gardner RH (1999) RULE: map generation and a spatial analysis program. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp 280-303
9. NE Good 1936 The flour beetles of the genus Tribolium USDA Tech Bull 5 27 28
10. BJ Goodwin L Fahrig 2002 Effect of landscape structure on the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis Can J Zool 80 24 35 10.1139/z01-196
11. KJ Haynes JT Cronin 2006 Interpatch movement and edge effects: the role of behavioral responses to the landscape matrix Oikos 113 43 54 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13977.x
12. SK Heinz E Strand 2006 Adaptive patch searching strategies in fragmented landscapes Evol Ecol 20 113 130 10.1007/s10682-005-5378-y
13. SK Heinz C Wissel K Frank 2006 The viability of metapopulations: individual dispersal behaviour matters Landsc Ecol 21 77 89 10.1007/s10980-005- 0148-3
14. AR Ives 1995 Spatial heterogeneity and host-parasitoid population dynamics: do we need to study behavior? Oikos 74 366 376 10.2307/3545981
15. ID Jonsen PD Taylor 2000 Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation Oikos 88 553 562 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880312.x
16. NB Kotliar JA Wiens 1990 Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity Oikos 59 253 260
17. SL Lima PA Zollner 1996 Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes Trends Ecol Evol 11 131 135 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81094-9
18. Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY
19. NE McIntyre JA Wiens 2000 A novel use of the lacunarity index to discern landscape function Landsc Ecol 15 313 321 10.1023/A:1008148514268
20. A Moilanen I Hanski 2001 On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology Oikos 95 147 151 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950116.x
21. JM Morales SP Ellner 2002 Scaling up animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: the importance of behavior Ecology 83 240 247
22. JD Olden JD Schooley J Monroe NL Poff 2004 Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes J Anim Ecol 73 1190 1194 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00889.x
23. RE Plotnick RH Gardner RV O'Neill 1993 Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture Landsc Ecol 8 201 211 10.1007/BF00125351
24. BD Roitberg M Mangel 1997 Individuals on the landscape: behavior can mitigate landscape differences among habitats Oikos 80 234 240 10.2307/3546591
25. RE Russell RK Swihart Z Feng 2003 Population consequences of movement decisions in a patchy landscape Oikos 103 142 152 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003. 12418.x
26. SAS Institute, Inc (2002) SAS version 9.1. Cary, NC
27. RL Schooley JA Wiens 2003 Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity Oikos 102 559 570 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12490.x
28. N Schtickzelle A Joiris H Van Dyck M Baguette 2007 Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behavior within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly BMC Evol Biol 7 4 10.1186/1471-2148-7-4
29. JA Stamps M Buechner VV Krishnan 1987 The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat Am Nat 129 533 552 10.1086/284656
30. PD Taylor L Fahrig K Henein G Merriam 1993 Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure Oikos 68 571 573 10.2307/3544927
31. P Turchin 1989 Population consequences of aggregative movement J Anim Ecol 58 75 100 10.2307/4987
32. H Van Dyck M Baguette 2005 Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? Basic Appl Ecol 6 535 545 10.1016/j.baae.2005.03. 005
33. Wiens JA (2001) The landscape concept of dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 96-109
34. JA Wiens NC Stenseth B Van Horne RA Ims 1993 Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology Oikos 66 369 380 10.2307/3544931
35. JA Wiens RL Schooley RD Weeks Jr 1997 Patchy landscapes and animal movements: do beetles percolate? Oikos 78 257 264 10.2307/3546292
36. KA With 1994 Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure Landsc Ecol 9 25 36 10.1007/BF00135076
37. KA With TO Crist 1995 Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscape structure Ecology 76 2446 2459 10.2307/2265819
38. KA With TO Crist 1996 Translating across scales: simulating species distributions as the aggregate response of individuals to heterogeneity Ecol Modell 93 125 137 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00219-7
39. KA With AW King 1999 Dispersal success and fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds Landsc Ecol 14 73 82 10.1023/A: 1008030215600
40. KA With SJ Cadaret C Davis 1999 Movement responses to patch structure in experimental fractal landscapes Ecology 80 1340 1353
41. KA With DM Pavuk JL Worchuck RK Oates JL Fisher 2002 Threshold effects of landscape structure on biological control in agroecosystems Ecol Appl 12 52 65 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0052:TEOLSO]2.0.CO;2
42. PA Zollner SL Lima 1997 Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice: perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat Oikos 80 51 60 10.2307/3546515
43. PA Zollner SL Lima 1999 Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements Ecology 80 1019 1030
44. PA Zollner SL Lima 2005 Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across patchy landscape Oikos 108 121 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13711.x