Revisit bayesian approaches for spam detection

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, ICYCS 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 659-664

  Yeh, Chun Chao ^a   Chiang, Soun Jan ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Naive bayesian filer; Spam; Spam detection

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; SPAMMING;

BAYESIAN APPROACHES; BAYESIAN FILTERS; ENCODING SCHEMES; MULTIMEDIA CONTENTS; NAIVE BAYESIAN FILER; PRACTICAL ISSUES; SPAM; SPAM DATABASES; SPAM DETECTION; SPAM MAILS;

INTERNET;

EID: 58349098344     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICYCS.2008.434     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. http://www.spamarchive.org/
2. http://www.ala.org/
3. http://www.info.gov.hk/isd/news/index.htm/
4. charset set. http://www.iana.org/assignments/charaeter- sets/
5. Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt
6. http://www.businessweek.com/
7. Weinstein, L.: Inside risks: Spam wars. Communication of ACM, Vol. 46, No. 8 (2003) 136-136.
8. Corbato, F.J.: On computer system challenges. Journal of ACM, vol. 50, No. 1 (2003) 30-31.
9. Sahami, M., Dumaisy, S., Heckermany, D., Horvitzy, E.: A Bayesian approach to filtering junk E-Mail. In Proc. Of AAAI Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, July 1998, Madison, Wisconsin, (1998) 55-62.
10. Graham, P.: A plan for spam. Aug 2002, available at http://www. paulgraham.com/spam.html.
11. Androutsopoulos, I., Paliouras, G., Karkaletsis, V., Sakkis, G., Spyropoulos, C, Stamatopoulos, P.: Learning to filter spam e-mail: A comparison of a naive bayesian and a memorybased approach. In Proc. of the PKDD workshop on Machine Learning and Textual Information Access, (2000) 1-13.
12. Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 2, (2001) 45-66.
13. Drucker, IL Wu, D., Vapnik, V.N.: Support vector machines for spam categorization. IEEE Trans, on Neural Networks, Vol. 10, No. 5,(1999) 1048-1054.
14. Carreras, X., Marquez, L.,: Boosting trees for anti- Spam email filtering. In Proc. of Euro Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2001), Sep. 2001.
15. Hulten, G., Penta A., Seshadrinathan G., Mishra, M.:Trends in spam products and methods. In Proc. of First Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS), 2004.
16. Machlis, S.: Uh-oh: spam's getting more sophisticated. Computerworld, Jan 17 2003, available at http://www.computerworld.com.
17. Graham-Cumming,J.: How to beat an adaptive spam filter. In Proc. of MIT Spam Conference, 2004.
18. Wittel, G.L., Wu, S.F.: On attacking statistical spam filters. In Proc. of First Conference on Email and Anti- Spam (CEAS), 2004.
19. Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse (DCC). Available at: http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/.