A collaborative anti-spam system

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 3 PART 2, 2009, Pages 6645-6653

  Lai, Gu Hsin ^a   Chen, Chia Mei ^a   Laih, Chi Sung ^b   Chen, Tsuhan ^c  

^a NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Reinforcement learning; Rough Set theory; Spam mail

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC MAIL FILTERS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

ANTI-SPAM FILTERS; ANTI-SPAM SYSTEMS; COLLABORATIVE FRAMEWORK; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING APPROACH; RULE GENERATION; RULE MANAGEMENTS; SPAM MAILS; SPAM MESSAGES;

ROUGH SET THEORY;

EID: 58349085716     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.075     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Carreras, X., & Marquez, L. (2001). Boosting trees for anti-spam email filtering. In Fourth international conference on recent advances in natural language processing.
2. Chouchoulas, A. (2004). A rough set-based approach to text classification. In Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 1711, pp. 118-127).
3. Clark, J., Koprinska, I., & Poon, J. (2003). A neural network based approach to automated e-mail classification. In IEEE/WIC international conference on web intelligence (pp. 702-705).
4. Cranor L.F., and LaMacchia B.A. Spam!. Communications of the ACM 41 8 (1998) 74-83
5. Drucker H., Wu D., and Vapnik V.N. Support vector machines for spam categorization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10 5 (1999) 1048-1054
6. Hidalgo, J. (2002). Evaluating cost-sensitive unsolicited bulk email categorization. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 615-620).
7. Katirai, H. (1999). Filtering junk e-mail: A performance comparison between genetic programming and Naive Bayes. Technical report, Available: .
8. Kunlun, L., & Houkuan, H. (2002). An architecture of active learning SVMs for spam. In Sixth international conference on signal processing (Vol. 2, pp. 1247-1250).
9. Pawlak Z. Rough sets and intelligent data analysis. Information Sciences 147 1-4 (2002) 1-12
10. Rosetta. (2001). .
11. Sahami, M., Dumais, S., Heckerman, D., & Horvitz, E. (1998). A Bayesian approach to filtering junk e-mail. In Proceedings of workshop on learning for text categorization.
12. Skowron, A., & Son, N. (1999). Boolean reasoning scheme with some applications in data mining. In Proceedings of the third European conference on principles of data mining and knowledge discovery (pp. 107-115).
13. Sutton R.S., and Barto A.G. Reinforcement learning: An introduction (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Woitaszek, M., Shaaban, M., & Czernikowski, R. (2003). Identifying junk electronic mail in Microsoft outlook with a support vector machine. In Symposium on applications and the internet (pp. 66-169).
15. Wrblewski, J. (1995). Finding minimal reducts using genetic algorithms. In Proceeding of the second annual joint conference on information sciences (pp. 186-189).
16. Zhao, W., & Zhang, Z. (2005). An email classification model based on rough set theory. In Proceedings of the international conference on active media technology (pp. 403-408).
17. Zhao W., and Zhu Y. An email classification scheme based on decision-theoretic rough set theory and analysis of email security. IEEE TENCON (2005) 1-6