Hadamard phylogenetic methods and the n-taxon process

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 339-351

  Bryant, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Hadamard conjugation; Phylogenetics; Spectral decomposition; Stochastic models

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGY; DECISION TREE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DECISION TREES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MARKOV CHAINS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PHYLOGENY;

EID: 58349085293     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: 15229602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-008-9364-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J. Bashford P.D. Jarvis J. Sumner M.A. Steel 2004 U(1)×U(1) ×U(1) symmetry of the Kimura 3ST model and phylogenetic branching processes J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 37 81 89
2. Bryant, D., 2005. Extending tree models to split networks. In: Pachter, L., Sturmfels, B. (Eds.), Algebraic Statistics for Computational Biology, pp. 322-334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Bryant, D., Galtier, N., Poursat, M.-A., 2005. Likelihood calculations in molecular phylogenetics. In: Gascuel, O. (Ed.), Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny, pp. 33-62. Oxford University Press, London.
4. D. Bryant V. Moulton 2004 NeighborNet: An agglomerative algorithm for the construction of planar phylogenetic networks Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 255 265
5. S.N. Evans T.P. Speed 1993 Invariants of some probability models used in phylogenetic inference Ann. Stat. 21 1 355 377
6. Felsenstein, J., 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer, Sunderland.
7. M. Hendy D. Penny 1989 A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees Syst. Zool. 38 4 297 309
8. M.D. Hendy 1989 The relationship between simple evolutionary tree models and observable sequence data Syst. Zool. 38 4 310 321
9. M.D. Hendy S. Snir 2008 Hadamard conjugation for the Kimura 3st model: Combinatorial proof using path sets Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 5 3 461 471
10. Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R., 1994. Topics in Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Corrected reprint of the 1991 original.
11. K.T. Huber M. Langton V. Penny D. Moulton M. Hendy 2002 Spectronet: A package for computing spectra and median networks Appl. Bioinform. 1 3 2041 2059
12. D. Huson D. Bryant 2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 254 267
13. P.D. Jarvis J. Bashford 2001 Quantum field theory and phylogenetic branching J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 34 L703 707
14. Klaere, S., Gesell, T., Haeseler, A.v, 2008, in press. The impact of single substitutions on multiple sequence alignments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 275.
15. M.A. Steel M.D. Hendy L.A. Székely P.L. Erdos 1992 Spectral analysis and a closest tree method for genetic sequences Appl. Math. Lett. 5 6 63 67
16. B. Sturmfels S. Sullivant 2005 Toric ideals of phylogenetic invariants J. Comput. Biol. 12 2 204 228
17. Swofford, D., Olsen, G.J., Waddell, P.J., Hillis, D.M., 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C., Mable, B.K. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics, 2nd edn., pp. 407-514. Sinauer, Sunderland.
18. L.A. Székely P.L. Erdos M.A. Steel D. Penny 1993 A Fourier inversion formula for evolutionary trees Appl. Math. Lett. 6 2 13 16
19. L.A. Székely M.A. Steel P.L. Erdos 1993 Fourier calculus on evolutionary trees Adv. Appl. Math. 14 2 200 210