The analysis of Taiwanese bank efficiency: Incorporating both external environment risk and internal risk

Economic Modelling

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 456-463

  Chiu, Yung Ho ^a   Chen, Yu Chuan ^b  

^a SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHIHLEE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency; Risk; Super efficiency; Three stage approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 58249121596     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2008.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aigner D., Lovell C.A.K., and Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6 (1977) 21-37
2. Altunbas Y., Liu M.H., Molyneux P., and Seth R. Efficiency and risk in Japanese banking. Journal of Banking and Finance 24 (2000) 1605-1628
3. Aly H.Y., Grabowski R., Pasurka C., and Rangan N. Technical, scale, and allocative efficiencies in U.S. banking: an empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 30 (1990) 211-218
4. Andersen P., and Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 10 (1993) 1261-1264
5. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimations of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 9 (1984) 1078-1092
6. Barr R.S., Seiford L.M., and Siems T.F. Forecasting bank failure: a non-parametric frontier estimation approach. Recherches Economigues de Louvain 60 4 (1994) 417-429
7. Battese G.E., and Coelli T.J. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis 3 (1992) 153-169
8. Battese G.E., and Coelli T.J. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20 (1995) 325-332
9. Berger A.N., and DeYoung R. Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance 21 (1997) 849-870
10. Bhattacharyya A., Lovell C.A.K., and Sahay P. The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research 98 2 (1997) 332-345
11. Boardman A., and Vining A.R. In: Zerbe R.O. (Ed). The Behavior of Mixed Enterprises. Research In Law and Economics vol. 14 (1991) 223-250
12. Bogetoft P., and Hougaard J.L. Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack. European Journal of Operational Research 152 (2004) 14-21
13. Cebenoyan A.S., Cooperman E.S., and Register C.A. Firm efficiency and the regulatory closure of S&Ls: an empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (1993) 540-545
14. Chang C.C. The nonparametric risk-adjusted efficiency measurement: an application to Taiwan's major rural financial intermediaries. American Journal Agricultural Economic 81 (1999) 902-913
15. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 6 (1978) 429-444
16. Charnes A., Haag S., Jaska P., and Semple J. Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Systems Science 23 5 (1992) 789-798
17. Chen T.Y., and Yeh T.L. A measurement of bank efficiency, ownership and productivity change. Service Industries Journal 20 1 (2000) 95-109
18. Coelli T.J. A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: a computer program for stochastic Frontier production and cost function estimation. CEPA Working Paper (1996) 1-33
19. Cornwell C., Schmidt P., and Sickles R.C. Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 185-200
20. Drake L., and Hall M.J.B. Efficiency in Japanese banking: an empirical analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance 27 (2003) 891-917
21. Drake L., Hall M.J.B., and Simper R. The impact of macroeconomic and regulatory factors on bank efficiency: a non-parametric analysis of Hong Kong's banking system. Journal of Banking and Finance 30 (2006) 1443-1466
22. Dula J.H., and Hickman B.L. Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix. Journal of Operational Research 48 (1997) 1001-1012
23. Elyasiani E., Mehdian S., and Rezvanian R. An empirical test of association between production and financial performance: the case of the commercial banking industry. Apply Finance Economic 14 (1994) 55-59
24. Farrell M. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 120 (1957) 253-281
25. Favero C.A., and Papi L. Technical efficiency and scale efficiency in the Italian banking sector. Applied Economics 27 (1995) 385-395
26. Ferrier G.D., and Lovell C.A.K. Measuring cost efficiency in banking: econometric and linear programming evidence. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 229-245
27. Fried H.O., Lovell C.A.K., and Eeckaut P.V. Evaluating the performance of US credit unions. Journal of Banking and Finance 17 (1993) 251-265
28. Fried H.O., Schmidt S.S., and Yaisawarng S. Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency. Journal of productivity Analysis 12 (1999) 249-267
29. Fried H.O., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt S.S., and Yaisawarng S. Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of productivity Analysis 17 (2002) 157-174
30. Fukuyama H., Guerra R., and Weber W.L. Efficiency and ownership: evidence from Japanese credit cooperatives. Journal of Economics and Business 51 (1999) 473-487
31. Girardone C., Molyneux P., and Gardener E.P.M. Analysing the determinants of bank efficiency: the case of Italian banks. Applied Economics 36 (2004) 215-227
32. Grabowski R., Rangan N., and Rezvanian R. Organizational firms in banking: an empirical investigation of cost efficiency. Journal of Banking and Finance 17 (1993) 531-538
33. Huang T.H., and Wang M.H. Comparison of Economic Efficiency Estimation Methods: Parametric and Non-Parametric Techniques (2000), Tamkang University., Taipei Working paper
34. Hughes J.P. Incorporating risk into the analysis of production. Atlantic Economic Journal 27 (1999) 1-23
35. Hughes J.P., William L., Mester L.J., and Moon C.G. Recovering risk technologies using the almost ideal demand system: an application to U.S. banking. Journal of Financial Services Research 18 (2000) 5-27
36. Hughes J.P., Mester L.J., and Moon C.G. Are scale economies in banking elusive or illusive? Evidence obtained by incorporating capital structure and risk-taking into models of bank production. Journal of Banking and Finance 25 (2001) 2169-2208
37. Lovell C.A.K., and Rouse A.P.B. Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54 (2003) 101-108
38. Mester L.J. A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk-preferences. Journal of Banking and Finance 20 (1996) 1025-1045
39. Pastor J.M. Efficiency and risk management in Spanish banking: a method to decompose risk. Applied Financial Economics 9 (1999) 371-384
40. Pastor J.M. Credit risk and efficiency in the European banking system: a three-stage analysis. Applied Financial Economics 12 (2002) 895-911
41. Pitt M.M., and Lee L.F. The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of Development Economics 9 (1981) 43-64
42. Resti A. Evaluating the cost efficiency of the Italian banking system: what can be learned from the joint application of parametric and non-parametric techniques. Journal of Banking and Finance 21 (1997) 221-250
43. Schaffnit C., Rosen D., and Paradi J.C. Best practice analysis of bank branches: an application of DEA in a large Canadian bank. European Journal of Operational Research 98 (1997) 269-289
44. Schmidt P., and Sickles R.C. Production frontiers and panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2 (1984) 367-394
45. Sealey C., and Lindley J. Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. Journal of Finance 32 (1977) 1551-1566
46. Seiford L.M., and Thrall R.M. Recent developments in DEA: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 7-38
47. Seiford L.M., and Zhu J. Infeasibility of super efficiency DEA models. INFOR 37 (1999) 174-187
48. Thrall R.M. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. The Annals of Operation Research 66 (1996) 109-138
49. Timmer C.P. Using a probabilistic frontier production function to measure technical efficiency. Journal of Political Economy 79 4 (1971) 776-794
50. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 130 (2001) 498-509
51. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 143 (2002) 32-41
52. Xue M., and Harker P.T. Note: ranking DMUs with infeasible super-efficiency DEA models. Management Science 48 5 (2002) 705-710
53. Zaim O. The effect of financial liberalization on the efficiency of Turkish commercial banks. Applied Financial Economics 5 (1995) 257-264
54. Zhu J. Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 90 (1996) 451-460