Gillnet catch in estimating the density and structure of fish community-Comparison of gillnet and trawl samples in a eutrophic lake

Fisheries Research

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 88-94

  Olin, M ^a   Malinen, T ^a   Ruuhijarvi J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Density; Gillnet; Length distribution; Sampling; Selectivity; Species distribution; Trawl

Indexed keywords

HYPEROGLYPHE POROSA;

EID: 58249107963     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Backiel, T., Welcomme, R., 1980. Guidelines for sampling fish in inland waters. EIFAC Technical paper, 33. FAO, Rome, 176 pp.
2. Bethke E., Arrhenius F., Cardinale M., and Håkansson N. Comparison of the selectivity of three pelagic sampling trawls in a hydroacoustic survey. Fish. Res. 44 (1999) 15-23
3. Hamley J.M. Review of gillnet selectivity. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32 (1975) 1943-1969
4. Hjellvik V., Godø O.R., and Tjøstheim D. Diurnal variation in bottom trawl survey catches: does it pay to adjust?. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59 (2001) 33-48
5. Jeppesen E., Jensen J.P., Søndegaard M., Lauridsen T., and Landkildehus F. Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshwater Biol. 45 (2000) 201-218
6. Kurkilahti, M., 1999. Nordic multimesh gillnet-robust gear for sampling fish populations. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Biology, University of Turku, 108 pp.
7. Kurkilahti M., Appelberg M., Bergstrand E., and Enderlein O. An indirect estimate of bimodal selectivity of smelt. J. Fish Biol. 52 (1998) 243-254
8. Linløkken A., and Haugen T.O. Density and temperature dependence of gill net catch per unit effort for perch, Perca fluviatilis, and roach, Rutilus rutilus. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 13 (2006) 261-269
9. Mehner T., Diekmann M., Brämick U., and Lemcke R. Composition of fish communities in German lakes as related to lake morphology, trophic state, shore structure and human-use intensity. Freshwater Biol. 50 (2005) 70-85
10. Minns C.K., and Hurley D.A. Effects of net length and set time on fish catches in gill nets. North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 8 (1988) 216-223
11. Olin M., and Malinen T. Comparison of gillnet and trawl in diurnal fish community sampling. Hydrobiologia 506-509 (2003) 443-449
12. Olin M., Rask M., Ruuhijärvi J., Kurkilahti M., Ala-Opas P., and Ylönen O. Fish community structure in mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes of southern Finland: the relative abundances of percids and cyprinids along a trophic gradient. J. Fish Biol. 60 (2002) 593-612
13. Olin M., Kurkilahti M., Peitola P., and Ruuhijärvi J. The effects of fish accumulation on the catchability of multimesh gillnet. Fish. Res. 68 (2004) 135-147
14. Peltonen H., Ruuhijärvi J., Malinen T., and Horppila J. Estimation of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) and smelt (Osmerus eperlanus (L.)) stocks with virtual population analysis hydroacoustics and gillnet CPUE. Fish. Res. 44 (1999) 25-36
15. Psuty I., and Borowski W. The selectivity of gill nets to bream (Abramis brama L.) fished in the Polish part of the Vistula Lagoon. Fish. Res. 32 (1997) 249-261
16. Repka, S. (Ed.), 2005. Lake Hiidenvesi-studies on a clay-turbid and eutrophic multi-basin lake. Arch. Hydrobiol., Adv. Limnol. 59. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 232 pp.
17. Richardson, I.D., 1956. Selection in drift nets. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, CM. 1956, Comp. Fish. Comm. 57, 13 pp.