Wielding the sword of professional ethics against misleading dietary supplement claims

Glycobiology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 660-663

  Torok, Charis B ^a,b   Murray, Thomas H ^a  

^a HASTINGS CENTER   (United States)

^b Union Mount Sinai University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DRUG APPROVAL; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG LABELING; DRUG MARKETING; DRUG MISUSE; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SCIENTIST;

EID: 58249106962     PISSN: 09596658     EISSN: 14602423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwn060     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Kaiser J. 2007. Who owns glycobiology? Science. 318:734-737.
2. Cohen PJ. 2005. The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act: Regulation at a crossroads. Science, politics, and the regulation of dietary supplements: It's time to repeal DSHEA. Am. J. L. Med. 31:175-224.