The effect of climate and land use change on flow duration in the Maryland Piedmont region

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 24, 2008, Pages 4710-4722

  Hejazi, Mohamad I ^a   Moglen, Glenn E ^b  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Impervious area; Land use; Optimization; Streamflow; Urban hydrology; Watershed

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODEL; CLIMATE PREDICTION; FLOW DURATION; FUTURE CLIMATE; HYDROLOGIC CHANGES; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; IMPERVIOUS AREA; LAND-USE CHANGE; LOW FLOW; MARYLAND; ON FLOW; OPTIMIZATION ROUTINE; PEAK FLOWS; STREAMFLOW MODELS; TEMPERATURE PREDICTION; URBAN HYDROLOGY;

FORECASTING; HYDRAULIC MODELS; LAND USE; LANDFORMS; OPTIMIZATION; STREAM FLOW; WATER; WATERSHEDS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CLIMATE MODELING; CLIMATE PREDICTION; FLOW MODELING; HADLEY CELL; HYDROLOGICAL CHANGE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND USE CHANGE; OPTIMIZATION; PEAK FLOW; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); STREAMFLOW; WATERSHED;

NORTH AMERICA; PIEDMONT [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58249102699     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7080     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barringer TH, Reiser RG, Price CV. 1994. Potential effects of development on flow characteristics of two New Jersey streams. Water Resources Bulletin 30: 283-295.
2. Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC, Kittle JL Jr, Donigian AS Jr, Johanson RC. 1997. Hydrologic simulations program-Fortran: user's manual version II. US Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia, EPA/600/R-97/080.
3. Boer GJ, McFarlane NA, Lazare M. 1992. Greenhouse gas-induced climate change simulated with the CCC second-generation general circulation model. American Meteorological Society 5: 1045-1077.
4. Bowling LC, Lettenmaier DP, Nijssen B, et al. 2003. Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS phase 2(e) - 1: Experiment description and summary intercomparisons. Global and Planetary Change 38(1-2): 1-30.
5. Cox DR, Stuart A. 1955. Some quick tests for trend in location and dispersion. Biometrika 42: 80-95.
6. Crawford NH, Linsley RK. 1966. Digital simulation in hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model IV. Stanford University, Department of Civil Engineering Technical Report 39.
7. Fang M, Tung KK. 1999. Time-dependant non-linear Hadley circulation. American Meteorological Society 56: 1797-1807.
8. Ferguson BK, Suckling PW. 1990. Changing rainfall-runoff relationships in the urbanizing peachtree creek watershed, Atlanta, Georgia. Water Resources Bulletin 26(2): 313-322.
9. Flato GM, Boer GJ, Lee WG, McFarlane NA, Ramsden D, Reader MC, Weaver AJ. 2000. The Canadian center for climate modelling and analysis global coupled model and its climate. Climate Dynamics 16: 451-467.
10. Hamon RW. 1963. Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication 63, Willingford, Oxon., UK.
11. Hollis GE. 1977. Water yield changes after the urbanization of the Canons Brook catchment. Hydrological Science Bulletin 22: 61-75.
12. Klein RD. 1979. Urbanization and stream quality impairment. Water Resources Bulletin 15: 948-963.
13. Konrad CP, Booth DB. 2002. Hydrologic trends associated with urban development for selected streams in the Puget Sound Basin, Western Washington. USGS. Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4040.
14. Kouwen N, Danard M, Bingeman A, Luo W, Seglenieks FR, Soulis ED. 2005. Case study: watershed modeling with distributed model data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10(1): 23-38.
15. Leopold LB. 1968. Hydrology for Urban Land Planning: A Guidebook on the Hydrologic Effects of Land Use. US Geological Survey Circular 554.
16. McCuen RH, Snyder WM. 1975. A proposed index for comparing hydrographs. Water Resources Research 11(6): 1021-1024.
17. McCuen RH, Synder WM. 1986. Hydrologic Modeling: Statistical Methods and Applications. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. McCuen RH. 1989. Hydrologic Analysis and Design. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Meyer SC. 2005. Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA. Hydrogeology Journal 13: 871-885.
20. Moglen GE, Beighley RE. 2002. Spatially explicit hydrologic modeling of land use change. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(1): 241-253.
21. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), 2003. The Vegetation/ Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP). Available at http://dataserver.ucar.edu/vemap/main.html. Accessed in January 2003.
22. Neff R, Chang H, Knight CG, Najjar RG, Yarnal B, Walker HA. 2000. Impact of climate variation and change on Mid-Atlantic region hydrology and water resources. Climate Research 14(3): 207-218.
23. Pandey GR, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD, Georgakakos KP. 2000. A hybrid model for interpolating daily precipitation in the Sierra Nevada of California during winter. Journal of Hydrometeorology 1(6): 491-506.
24. Paul M, Meyer J, Judy L. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Revue of Ecology Systems 32: 333-365.
25. Polsky C, Allard J, Currit N, Crane R, Yarnal B. 2000. The Mid-Atlantic region and its climate: past, present, and future. Climate Research 14(3): 161-173.
26. Rodell M, Houser PR, Berg AA, Famiglietti JS. 2005. Evaluation of 10 methods for initializing a land surface model. Journal of Hydrometeorology 6(2): 146-155.
27. Tokar AS, Johnson PA. 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4(3): 232-239.
28. Tokar AS, Markus M. 2000. Precipitation-runoff modeling using artifical neural networks and conceptual models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 5(2): 156-161.
29. Warner RF. 1984. Man's impact on Australian drainage systems. Australian Geographer 16: 133-141.