Fish orientation along the longitudinal profile of the Římov reservoir during daytime: Consequences for horizontal acoustic surveys

Fisheries Research

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 23-29

  Tušer, Michal ^a,b   Kubečka, Jan ^a,b   Frouzová, Jaroslava ^b   Jarolím, Oldřich ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Acoustics; Canyon shaped reservoir; Daytime; Fish aspect; Fish orientation; Freshwater

Indexed keywords

EID: 58249097230     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.09.022     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Balk H., and Lindem T. Improved fish detection in data from split-beam sonar. Aquatic Living Resources 13 (2000) 297-303
2. Balk H., and Lindem T. Sonar4, Sonar5 and Sonar6-Postprocessing Systems. Operator Manual (2006), University of Oslo, Norway p. 427
3. Brede, R., Kristensen, F.H., Solli, H., Ona, E., 1990. Target tracking with a split-beam echosounder. Rapport des Proces-Verbaux de Reunion du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer. 189, 254-263.
4. Burwen D.L., and Fleischman S.J. Evaluation of side-aspect target strength and pulse width as potential hydroacoustic discriminators of fish species in rivers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55 (1998) 2492-2502
5. Čech M., and Kubečka J. Sinusoidal cycling swimming pattern of reservoir fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 61 (2002) 456-471
6. Draštík V., and Kubečka J. Fish avoidance of acoustic survey boat in shallow waters. Fisheries Research 72 2-3 (2005) 219-228
7. Ehrenberg J.E., and Torkelson T.C. Application of dual-beam and split-beam target tracking in fisheries acoustics. ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 60 (1996) 700-706
8. Foote K.G. Angular measures of dorsal aspect target strength functions of fish. Fiskeridirektoratets Akr. (Havunders) 17 2 (1980) 49-70
9. Foote K.G. Effect of fish behaviour on echo energy: the need for measurements of orientation distributions. Journal du Conseil International pour Exploration de la Mer 39 (1980) 193-201
10. Foote K.G., Knudsen H.P., Korneliussen R.J., Nordbo P.E., and Roang K. Postprocessing system for echosounder data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90 (1991) 37-47
11. Foote K.G., and Traynor J.J. Comparison of walleye Pollock target strength estimates determined from in situ measurements and calculations based on swimbladder form. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 83 (1988) 9-17
12. Frouzová J., Kubečka J., Balk H., and Frouz J. Target strength of some European fish species and its dependence on fish body parameters. Fisheries Research 75 (2005) 86-96
13. Furusawa, M., Miyanohana, Y., 1990. Behaviour and target-strength observation through echo traces of individual fish. Rapport des Proces-Verbaux de Reunion du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer. 189, 283-294.
14. Hateley, J., Gregory, J., Ingleby, A., 2006. Evaluation of a multi-beam imaging sonar system (DIDSON) as a fisheries monitoring tool. Project Record October 2006. Environment Agency, Warrington, UK.
15. Horne J.K., and Clay C.S. Sonar systems and aquatic organisms: matching equipment and model parameters. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55 (1998) 1296-1306
16. Huse I., and Ona E. Tilt angle distribution and swimming speed of overwintering Norwegian spring spawning herring. ICES Journal of Marine Science 53 (1996) 863-873
17. Kieser R., Mulligan T.J., and Ehrenberg J.E. Observation and explanation of systematic split-beam angle measurement errors. Aquatic Living Resources 13 (2000) 275-281
18. Kubečka J. Use of horizontal dual-beam sonar for fish surveys in shallow waters. In: Cowx I.G. (Ed). Stock Assessment in Inland Waters (1996), Fishing Book Blackwells 165-178
19. Kubečka J., and Duncan A. Acoustic size vs. real size relationship for common species of riverine fish. Fisheries Research 35 1-2 (1998) 115-125
20. Kubečka J., Duncan A., Duncan W.M., Sinclair D., and Butterworth A.J. Brown trout populations of three Scottish lochs estimated by horizontal sonar and multimesh gill nets. Fisheries Research 20 (1994) 29-48
21. Kubečka J., and Wittingerová M. Horizontal beaming as a crucial component of acoustic fish stock assessment in freshwater reservoirs. Fisheries Research 35 1-2 (1998) 99-106
22. Lilja J., Marjomaki T.J., Riikonen R., and Jurvelius J. Side-aspect target strength of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), brown trout (Salmo trutta), whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus), and pike (Esox lucius). Aquatic Living Resources 13 (2000) 355-360
23. MacLennan D.N. Acoustical measurement of fish abundance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (1990) 1-15
24. Midttun, L., 1984. Fish and other organisms as acoustic targets. Rapport des Proces- Verbaux de Reunion du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer. 184, 25-33.
25. Moursund R.A., Carlson T.J., and Peters R.D. A fisheries application of a dual-frequency identification sonar acoustic camera. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60 (2003) 678-683
26. Ona E. Herring tilt angles, measured through target tracking. In: Funk F., Blackburn J., Hay D., Paul A.J., Stephenson R., Torenson R., and Witherell D. (Eds). Herring: Expectations for a New Millenium (2001), University of Alaska, Fairbanks 509-519 (University of Alaska Sea Grant, AK-SG-01-04. Fairbanks)
27. Rose G.A., and Porter D.R. Target-strength studies on Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Newfoundland waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science 53 (1996) 259-269
28. Simmonds E.J., and MacLennan D.N. Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. (2005), Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford p. 437
29. Stanton T.K., Reeder D.B., and Jech J.M. Inferring fish orientation from broadband-acoustic echoes. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60 (2003) 524-531
30. Vašek M., Kubečka J., Peterka J., Čech M., Draštík V., Hladík M., Prchalová M., and Frouzová J. Longitudinal and vertical spatial gradients in the distribution of fish within a canyon-shaped reservoir. International Review of Hydrobiology 89 4 (2004) 352-356