How many cervical cancers are prevented by treatment of screen-detected disease in young women?

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 124, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 461-464

  Sasieni, Peter ^a   Castanon, Alejandra ^a   Parkin, D Max ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer registration; Carcinoma in situ; Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLPOSCOPY; DISEASE COURSE; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; ONCOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 58249094715     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23922     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J. Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J Cancer 2003;89:88-93.
2. Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-5.
3. Zappa M, Visioli CB, Ciatto S, Iossa A, Paci E, Sasieni P. Lower protection of cytological screening for adenocarcinomas and shorter protection for younger women: the results of a case-control study in Florence. Br J Cancer 2004;90:1784-6.
4. Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparen P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, Dillner J, Tornberg S. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. JNCI 2008;100:622-9.
5. Health and Social Care Information Centre, Cervical Screening Program, England: 2004-2005. Community Health Statistics, NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2005.
6. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Storm H. Cancer incidence in five continents, vols. I-VIII. Available at http://www.dep.iarc.fr/ (accessed May 2008).
7. Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, Boyle P, eds. Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. IX (IARC Scientific Publications No. 160), 2007. Available at http://www.dep. iarc.fr/ (accessed May 2008).
8. Office for National Statistics. Cancer statistics registrations, vol. series MB1 no. 23-27, Government Statistical Service, 1990-1994.
9. Office for National Statistics. Cancer statistics registration, series MB1 no. 28-32, 1995-2005. Available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/ statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=8843 (accessed March 2008).
10. Cervical Screening Programme, England: 1997-2004, Health Care Statistics. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Statistics/ StatisticalWorkAreas/Statisticalhealthcare/DH-4086491(accessed March 2008).
11. Information Services Division Scotland. Annual registrations of CIN3 in Scotland for 1980-2004. Available at www.isdscotland.org/isd/files/cancer- cervix-insitu-inc.xls (accessed March 30, 2008).
12. Parkin DM, Nguyen-Dinh X, Day NE. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:150-7.
13. Herbert A, Holdsworth G, Kubba AA. Cervical screening: why young women should be encouraged to be screened. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:21-5.
14. McIndoe WA, McLean MR, Jones RW, Mullins PR. The invasive potential of carcinoma in situ of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64:451-8.
15. McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones RW, Skegg DC. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:425-34.
16. Boyes DA, Morrison B, Knox EG, Draper GJ, Miller AB. A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia. Clin Invest Med 1982;5:1-29.
17. Tidbury P, Singer A, Jenkins D. CIN 3: the role of lesion size in invasion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:583-6.
18. Jarmulowicz MR, Jenkins D, Barton SE, Goodall AL, Hollingworth A, Singer A. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:1061-6.
19. Parkin DM. A computer simulation model for the practical planning of cervical cancer screening programmes. Br J Cancer 1985;51:551-68.
20. Prorock PC. Mathematical models and natural history in cervical cancer screening, vol. 76. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications, 1986.
21. Morrison BJ, Coldman AJ, Boyes DA, Anderson GH. Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ. Br J Cancer 1996;74:814-9.
22. Gunnell AS, Ylitalo N, Sandin S, Sparen P, Adami HO, Ripatti S. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:2641-8.