Benefits of categorization training in patients with traumatic brain injury during post-acute rehabilitation: Additional evidence from a randomized controlled trial

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 312-328

  Constantinidou, Fofi ^a,b   Thomas, Robin D ^a   Robinson, Lacy ^c  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^c Genesis Healthcare System   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain injury; Categorization; Cognitive rehabilitation; Effectiveness; Efficacy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TEST; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CENTER; SURVIVOR; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONVALESCENCE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58249092171     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000336844.99079.2c     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, Langenbahn DM, Felicetti T, Kneipp S. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1681-1692.
2. Constantinidou F, Thomas RD, Best P. Principles of cognitive rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a systematic hierarchical approach. In: Ashley M, ed. Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Fla; CRC Publishers: 2004:337-365.
3. ConstantinidouF,Thomas RD, Scharp VL, Laske KM,Hammerly MD, Guitonde S. Effects of categorization training in patients with TBI during post-acute rehabilitation: preliminary findings. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20(2):143-157.
4. Constantinidou F, Thomas RD, Scharp VL, Hammerly MD, Best P. Categorization Program. Oxford, Ohio: Miami University; 2001.
5. Caramazza A, Shelton JR. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998;10:1-34.
6. Farah MJ, McClelland JL. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991;120:339-357.
7. Humphreys GW, Price CJ, Riddoch MJ. From objects to names: a cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychol Res. 1999;62:118- 130.
8. Ashby FG, Alfonso-Reese LA, Turken AU, Waldron EM. A neu-ropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychol Rev. 1998;105:442-481.
9. Erickson MA, Kruschke JK. Rules and exemplars in category learning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998;127:107-140.
10. Nosofsky RM. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986;115:39-57.
11. Maddox WT, Ashby FG. Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning. Behav Process. 2004;66:309-332
12. Ashby FG, Spierling BJ. The neurobiology of category learning. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004;3:101-113.
13. DeCaro MS, Thomas RD, Beilock SL. Individual differences in category learning: sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more. Cognition. 2008;107(1):284-294.
14. Milner B. Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting, the role of the frontal lobes. Arch Neurol. 1963;9:90-100.
15. Ashby FG, Waldron EM. On the nature of implicit categorization. Psychon Bull Rev. 1999;6:363-378.
16. Cree GS, McRae K. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003;132:163-201.
17. Humphreys GW, Forde EME. Hierarchies, similarity and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behav Brain Sci. 2001;24:453-509.
18. Joseph JE. Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: a critical review and metaanalysis. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001;1:119-136.
19. Ashby FG, Maddox WT, Bohil CJ. Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning. Mem Cogn. 2002;30:666-677.
20. Ashby FG, Noble S, Filoteo J, Waldron EM, Ell SW. Category learning deficits in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology. 2003;17:115-124.
21. Maddox WT, Ashby FG, Bohil CJ. Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003;29:650-662.
22. Maddox WT, Filoteo JV. Striatal contribution to category learning: quantitative modelingofsimple linear and complex nonlinear rule learning in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:710-727.
23. Whyte J, HartT.It's more than ablack box; it's a Russian doll defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:639- 652.
24. Bracy OL. Cognitive rehabilitation: a process approach. Cogn Rehabil. 1986;4(2):11-16.
25. Levin HS. Neuropsychological rehabilitation of head injured patients: an appraisal of recent progress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1992;suppl 26:14-24.
26. Luria AR. Restoration of functionafter braininjury. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1963.
27. Gentilini M, Nichelli P, Schoenhuber R. Assessment of attention in mild head injury. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AL, eds. Mild Head Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989:163- 175.
28. Thomas K, Harrington DE, Adams R, et al. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8(3):86-87.
29. Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Levels of cognitive functioning. In: Rehabilitation of the Head-Injured Adult: Comprehensive Physical Management. Downey, CA: Professional Staff Association of Rancho Los Amigos Hospital; 1972.
30. Levin HS, O'Donnell MA, Grossman RG. Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT): A Practical Scale to Assess Cognition After Head Injury. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1979.
31. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV: The DiagnosticandSta- tistical Manual of Mental Disorders. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1994.
32. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. The Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1996.
33. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. BostonDiagnostic Aphasia Examination. 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 2000.
34. Ishihara Test for Color Blindness. Available at: http://www.toledo-bend. com/colorblind/Ishihara.html. Accessed March 3, 2000.
35. Adamovich BB, Henderson JA, Auerbach S. Cognitive Rehabilitation of Closed Head Injured Patients:ADynamic Approach. San Diego, Ca: College Hill Press; 1985.
36. Coelho CA, DeRuyter F, Stein M. Treatment efficacy: cognitive communicative disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury in adults. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:S5-S17.
37. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
38. Zeno SM, Ivens SH, Millard RT, Duvvuri R. The Educator's Word Frequency Guide. New York, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates; 1995.
39. Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1999
40. Adamovich BB, Henderson JA. Scales of Cognitive Ability for Traumatic Brain Injury. Normed Ed. Itasca, Ill: Riverside Publishing Co; 1992.
41. Myers JE, Meyers KR. Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; 1995.
42. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1983.
43. Wechler D. Wechsler Memory Scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1999.
44. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learn-ingTest.2nd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 2000.
45. Grant DA, Berg EA. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Los Angeles, Ca: Western Psychological Services; 1981.
46. De Filippis NA, McCambell E. Booklet Category Test. 2nd ed. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; 1998
47. Smith A. Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Los Angeles, Ca: Western Psychological Services: 1973.
48. Benton A, Hamsher K. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa Press; 1978.
49. Woodcock RW, McGrew KS, Mather N. Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities. 3rd ed. Itasca, Ill: Riverside Publishing; 2001.
50. Malec JF, Moessner AM, Kragness M, Lezak MD. Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae to predict postacute rehabilitation outcome: rating scale analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI). J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15(1):670- 682.
51. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:75-87.
52. International Conference on Harmonization. ICH Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials. 1998. Available at: http://www.ich.org/pdfICH/e9.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2003.
53. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 2003.
54. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
55. Allison PD. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage: 2002:07- 136. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.
56. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2004.
57. Cahn DA, Sullivan EV, Shear PK, Pfefferbaum A, Heit G, Silverberg G. Differential contributions of cognitive and motor component processes to physical and instrumental activities of daily living in Parkinson's disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1998; 13(7):575-583.
58. Cicerone KD, Dahlber C, Kalmar K, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1596-1612.
59. Chestnut RM, Carney N, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Helfand M. Summary report: evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(2):176-188.
60. Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. Training in and dissemination of empirically validated psychological treatments. Clin Psychol. 1995;48:13-23.