The United Nations Global Compact: the business implementation and accountability challenge

International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 303-316

  Hemphill, Thomas A ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

accountability; codes of conduct; corporate citizenship; global compact; globalisation; non governmental organisations; principles; self regulation; transparency; United Nations

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149515000     PISSN: 14779048     EISSN: 1741802X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJBGE.2005.006714     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alliance for a Corporate-Free UN (2002) ‘The United Nations global compact vs. corporate accountability’, Information Sheet Prepared for Distribution at the Asian Civil Society Forum 2002 UNCC, Bangkok, Thailand, 9–13 December.
2. Amnesty International (2004) ‘Global compact leaders summit: statement by NGO participants’, Press Release, 24 June, http://web.amnesty.org/web/web.nfs/print/ec-letter-240604-eng (accessed September 5, 2004).
3. BusinessWeek Online (2004) Two Views of the Global Compact, 20 July, http://biz.yahoo.com/bizweek/040720/nf200407209215_db039_1.html?printer=1 (accessed on September 5, 2004).
4. Canabou, C. (2004) ‘Hail, global citizens’, Fast Company, January, p.59.
5. EarthRights International (2004) Joint Civil Society Statement on the Global Compact and Corporate Accountability, July, www.earthrights.org/news/ngogcstatement.html (accessed on September 5, 2004).
6. Engardio, P. (2004) ‘Commentary: global compact, little impact’, BusinessWeek online, 12 July, http://www.busmessweek.Com.prmt/magazine/content/04_28/b3891132_mz021.htaf/mz (accessed on September 4, 2004).
7. Global Reporting Initiative (2002) GRI and Other Initiatives: Global Compact, http://www.globalreporting.org/about/inigcompact.asp (accessed on September 5, 2004).
8. Hemphill, T.A. (1992) ‘Self-regulating industry behavior: antitrust limitations and trade association codes of conduct’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 11, No. 12, pp.915–920.
9. International Chamber of Commerce (2004) The Global Compact: A Business Perspective, June 24, http://www.iccwbo.org/home/statements_rules/statements/2004/The_global_compact_a_bus (accessed on September 5, 2004).
10. Kell, G. (2004) ‘Letter to James A. Paul, executive director, from George Kell, executive head of global compact, Office of the Secretary-General’, Global Policy Forum, August 3.
11. Leisinger, K.M. (2003) ‘Towards globalization with a human face: implementation of the UN global compact initiative at Novartis’, Parallax-The Journal of Ethics and Globalization, January-February, http//www.parallaxonline.org/peglobalhuman5p. html (accessed on September 5, 2004).
12. Lindblom, C.E. (1977) Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems, New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
13. McKinsey and Company (2004) Assessing the Global Compact’s Impact, May 11.
14. Rizvi, H. (2004) ‘UN pact with business lacks accountability – critics’, InterPress Service News Agency, http://www.ipsnews.net/Africa/print.asp?idnews=24365 (accessed on September 9, 2004).
15. Ruggle, J.G. (2004) ‘The global compact: an extraordinary journey’, in C. Fussler, A. Cramer, and S. van der Vegt (Eds.) Raising the Bar: Creating Value with the UN Global Compact, Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing, pp.15–17.
16. The Economist (2004) ‘Bluewashed and boilerplated’, 17 June, http://www.economist.com/business/PrinterFriendly.cfm?StoryID=2771522 (accessed on September 12, 2004).
17. United Nations Global Compact (2004a) About the Global Compact, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/content (accessed on September 5, 2004).
18. United Nations Global Compact (2004b) ‘Global compact summit concludes with emphasis on need to fight corruption’, Press Release, 24 June, http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2004/eco70.doc.htm (accessed on September 4, 2004).
19. United Nations, Commission on Human Rights (2003) ‘Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights’, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12 Rev. 2.
20. United Nations Global Compact (2004c) The Global Compact in Action: Announcements, Initiatives, Commitments, Innovation http://www.unglobalcompact.org/Portal/?NavigationTargets/roles/portal_user/newsEvents/nf/nf/gcsummit (accessed on September 5, 2004).
21. Williams, O. (2003) ‘Major US companies doubt global compact credentials’, BusinessDay, http://www.bdf.co.za/cgi-bin/pp-print.pl (accessed on September 7, 2004).
22. Wilson, G.K. (2003) Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction, 3rd edition, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave and Macmillan.
23. Wotruba, T.R. (1997) ‘Self-regulation: a review and extension to a global setting’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.38–54.
24. Other endorsees include World Economy, Ecology and Development Association, Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland, WAHLI/Friends of the Earth Indonesia, International Center for Law in Development, People’s Movement for Human Rights Learning, Medical Mission Sisters, Global Policy Forum, Women’s Environment and Development Organization, Institute for Policy Studies, Citizens for Global Solutions, Pro Natura/Friends of the Earth Switzerland, Friends of the Earth Europe, Swiss Coalition of Development Organizations, Elizabeth Seton Foundation, Global Action on Aging, Corporate Europe Observatory, Sahabat Alami/Friends of the Earth Malaysia, and Berne Declaration.
25. McKinsey and Company (2004) conducted 59 interviews of a cross-section of company, government and civil society (including labour) representatives and of Global Compact supporters and detractors, sent a web-based survey to 1700 Global Compact contacts that was completed by approximately 400, undertook extensive internal data analysis and secondary research, and tested their findings with three focus groups.