Experimental philosophy and folk concepts: Methodological considerations

Journal of Cognition and Culture

Volumn 6, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 331-342

  Knobe, Joshua ^a   Burra, Arudra ^b  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149501084     PISSN: 15677095     EISSN: 15685373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853706776931402     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. ADAMS, F. 1986 Intention and intentional action: The simple view. Mind and Language, 1, 281-301
2. ADAMS, F. & STEADMAN, A. 2004a Intentional action in ordinary language: Core concept or pragmatic understanding? Analysis, 64, 173-181
3. HAUSER, M., YOUNG, L. & CUSHMAN, F. forthcoming Reviving Rawls' linguistic analogy: Operative principles and the causal structure of moral actions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) Moral Psychology
4. KNOBE, J. 2004 Intention, intentional action and moral considerations. Analysis, 64, 181-187
5. 2004 Folk psychology and folk morality: Response to critics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24
6. forthcoming. Folk psychology: Science and morals. In Hutto, D. & Ratcliffe, M. (ed.) Folk psychology reassessed. Kluwer/Springer Press
7. MALLE, B. F. this volume The relation between judgments of intentionality and morality. Journal of Cognition and Culture
8. MELE, A. & MOSER, P. 1994 Intentional action. Nous, 28, 39-68
9. MORTON, A. 2003 The importance of being understood: Folk psychology as ethics. London: Routledge
10. NICHOLS, S. & ULATOWSKI, J. 2006 Intuitions and individual differences: The Knobe effect revisited. Unpublished manuscript. University of Utah