Frequency of caesarean sections amongst single-foetus births following infertility treatment: An investigation by the Hessian Perinatal Registry (HEPE);Sectio-Häufigkeit nach Sterilitätsbehandlung bei Einlingen: Eine Auswertung der Hessischen Perinatalerhebung (HEPE)

Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie

Volumn 212, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 217-221

  Kolip, Petra ^a   Misselwitz, B ^b   Schmidt, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b Geschaftsstelle Qualitatssicherung Hessen   (Germany)

^c PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction; Caesarean section; Infertility treatment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149487391     PISSN: 09482393     EISSN: 14391651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1098733     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. OECD Health Data 2007. Abrutbar unter: http://www.gbe-bund.de/gbe10/ ergebnisse.prc_tab?fid=9142&suchstring= kaiserschnitt&query_id=&sprache=D&fund_typ=TAB&methode= 2&vt=1&verwandte=1&page_ret=0&seite= &p_lfdn_nr=1&_pnews=&p_sprachkz=D&p_uid= gast&p_aid=j83833922&hlp_nr=3&p_janein=J
2. Ecker JL, Frigoletto F. Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. NEJM 2007; 356: 885-888
3. Linton A, Peterson MR. Effect of pre-existing chronic disease on primary caesarean delivery rates by race for births in US military hospitals, 1999-2002. Birth 2004; 31: 65-175
4. Wilkes PT, Wolf DM, Kronbach DW et al. Risk factors for cesarean delivery at presentation of nulliparous patients in labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1352-1357
5. Levine AB, Lockwood CJ, Brown B et al. Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: does it make a difference? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 55-58
6. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labour as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 917-922
7. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labour and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 628-633
8. Lerchl A. Where are the Sunday babies? Observations on a market decline in weekend births in Germany. Naturwissenschaften 2005; 92: 592-594
9. Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 1996; 347: 544
10. Reime B, Klein MC, Kelly A et al. Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes towards birth? BJOG 2004; 111: 1388-1393
11. Coco AS, Gates TJ, Gallagher ME et al. Association of attending physician specialty with the caesarean delivery rate in the same patient population. Fam Med 2000; 32: 639-644
12. Kokourian SM, Bush D, Rimm AA. Comparison of caesarean section rates in fee-for-service versus managed care patients in the Ohio Medicaid population, 1992-1997. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7: 134-142
13. Martin N. Caesarean celebrities who are "too posh to push". Daily Telegraph, 22nd May, 2001
14. Lutz U, Kolip P. Die GEK-Kaiserschnittstudie. St.Augustin: Asgard; 2006
15. Bundesgeschäftsstelle IVF-Register. Jahresbericht 2006. Abrufbar unter: www.deutsches-ivf-register.de
16. Papiernik E. The rate of preterm twin births 22 to 27 weeks as a criterion for measuring the quality of prenatal care. Twin Res 2001; 4: 426-300
17. Stanley F, Blair E, Alberman E. The special case of multiple pregnancy. In: Cerebral Palsies: Epidemiology and Causal Pathways. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000: 109-230
18. Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in occurrence, determinants and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinataol 2002; 26: 239-249
19. Blickstein I. Cerebral palsy in multifoetal pregnancies. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 352-355
20. Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW et al. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 967-977
21. Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A, Genetics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC); Reproductive Endocrinology Infertility Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28: 220-250
22. Van Voorhis BJ. Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 183-200
23. Wright VC, Chang J, Jeng G et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004. MMWR Surveill Summ 2007; 56: 1-22
24. McDonald SD, Murphy K, Beyenne J et al. Perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005; 27: 449-459
25. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 551-563
26. Thomson F, Shanbhag S, Tempelton A et al. Obstetric outcome in women with subfertility. BJOG 2005; 112: 632-637
27. Kozinski Z, Zadori J, Orvos H et al. Obstetric and neonatal risk of pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology: a matched control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 850-856
28. Felberbaum RE, von Otte S, Diedrich K. Unerfüllter Kinderwunsch: Stand der Fortpflanzungsmedizin in Deutschland. http://www.dggg.de/pdf/2005-06-felberbaum.pdf 2005
29. Maternity Center Association. What every pregnant woman needs to know about cesarean section. www.maternitywise.org/cesarean-booklet/2004
30. MacDorman MF, Declerq E, Menacker F et al. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal birth to women with "no indicated risk", United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts. Birth 2006; 33: 175-182
31. NICE - National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2004 Caesarean section. Clinical Guideline 13. www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=113192
32. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson J et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000
33. Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS et al. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2007; 176: 455-460
34. McFarlin BL. Elective cesarean birth: issues and ethics of an informed decision. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004; 49: 421-429
35. Leslie MS. Counseling women about elective cesarean section. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004; 49: 155-159
36. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd edition. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2004
37. NIH - National Institutes of Health. State-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. March 27-29, 2006