Temporal effects in a security inspection task: Breakdown of performance components

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 93-97

  Ghylin, K M ^a   Drury, C G ^a   Batta, R ^a   Lin, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSPECTION TASKS; PROBABILITY OF DETECTIONS; PROBABILITY OF FALSE ALARMS; STOPPING TIMES; TEMPORAL EFFECTS;

ALARM SYSTEMS; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INSPECTION; PROBABILITY;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 58149469790     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Chapman, D.E. & Sinclair, M.S. (1975). Ergonomics in Inspection Tasks in the Food Industry, in C.G. Drury and J.G. Fox (eds), Human Reliability in Quality Control (London: Taylore & Francis), pp. 241-251).
2. Craig, A. (1987). Signal Detection Theory and Probability Matching Apply to Vigilance. Human Factors, 29, 645-652.
3. Davies, D.R. & Parasuraman, R. (1982). The Psychology of Vigilance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Drury, C.G., Green, B.D. & Lin, J.F. (2006). Fatigue and FPI Inspection.
5. Fisk, A.D. & Schneider, W. (1981). Automatic and Control Processing during Tasks Requiring Sustained Attention: A New Approach to Vigilance. Human Factors, 25, 391-399.
6. Finomore, V. S. Warm, J. S., Matthews, G., Riley, M.A., Dember, W. N., Shaw, T. H., Ungar, N. R. and Scerbo, M. W. (2006) Measuring The Workload Of Sustained Attention Proceedings Of The Human Factors And Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting - 2006, 1614-1618
7. th World Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, 2006.
8. Gramopadhye, A.K. (1992). Training for Visual Inspection. PhD Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
9. Green, D. & Swets, J. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley: New York, NY.
10. Hofer, F. & Schwaninger, A. (2004). Reliable and Valid Measures of Threat Detection Performance in X-ray Screening. IEEE ICCST Proceedings, 38, 303-308.
11. Horowitz, Cade, Wolfe, & Cziesler (2003).
12. Mackie, R.R. (1987). Vigilance Research: Are WE Ready for Countermeasures? Human Factors, 29, 707-723.
13. Mackworth, N.H. (1948). The Breakdown of Vigilance during Prolonged visual Search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, pp. 6-21.
14. Mackworth, J. (1970). Vigilance and Attention. Penguin Publishers, Baltimore, MD.
15. th Annual Meeting, p. 922-926.
16. McCarley, J.S., Kramer, A.F., Wickens, C.D. Vidoni, E.D., & Boot, W.R. (2004). Visual Skills in Airport Securitỳ Inspection. Psychological Science, 15, 302-306.
17. Murgatroyd, R.A. Worrall, G.M. & Waites, C. (1994). A Study of the Human Factors Influencing the Reliability of Aircraft Inspection, AEA/TSD,0173. Risley, AEA Technology.
18. Spencer, F.W. & Schurman, D.L. (1995). Reliability Assessment at Airline Inspection Facilities, Vol III: Results of an Eddy-Current Inspection Reliability Experiment, DOT/FAA/CT-92/12, III, May 1995.
19. Teichner, W.H. (1974). The Detection of a Simple Visual Signal as a Function of Time of Watch. Human Factors, 16(4), pp. 339-353.
20. rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Williams, P.S. (1986). Processing Demands, Training, and Vigilance Decrement. Human Factors, 28, 567-579.