3D magnetic data-space inversion with sparseness constraints

Geophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Pilkington, Mark ^a  

^a GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; LINEAR SYSTEMS;

AEROMAGNETIC DATA; CONJUGATE GRADIENT ALGORITHMS; DATA-SPACE METHOD; LEAST SQUARES SOLUTIONS; LEAST-SQUARES INVERSION; LINEAR SYSTEM OF EQUATIONS; MAGNETIC ANOMALIES; SPARSENESS CONSTRAINTS;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY; ALGORITHM; DATA INVERSION; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIC METHOD; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 58149468848     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3026538     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alumbaugh, D. L., and G. A. Newman, 2000, Image appraisal for 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic inversion: Geophysics, 65, 1455-1467. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444834
2. Barbosa, V. C. F., J. B. C. Silva, and W. E. Medeiros, 2002, Practical applications of uniqueness theorems in gravimetry: Part 2 - Pragmatic incorporation of concrete geologic information: Geophysics, 67, 795-800. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1484523
3. Bertete-Aguirre, H., E. Cherkaev, and M. Oristaglio, 2002, Non-smooth gravity problem with total variation penalization functional: Geophysical Journal International, 149, 499-507. gji GJINEA 0956-540X 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01664.x
4. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
5. Boschi, L., 2003, Measures of resolution in global body wave tomography: Geophysical Research Letters, 30, no. 4, 1190, doi: 10.1029/2003 GL018222. gpr GPRLAJ 0094-8276 10.1029/2002GL016647
6. Boulanger, O., and M. Chouteau, 2001, Constraints in 3D gravity inversion: Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 265-280. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00254.x
7. Coyle, M., and F. Kiss, 2006, Residual total magnetic field, Wuskwatim Lake aeromagnetic survey, Manitoba, Pistol Lake 63 O/02, Manitoba: Geological Survey of Canada Open File 5126.
8. Farquharson, C. G., 2008, Constructing piecewise-constant models in multidimensional minimum-structure inversions: Geophysics, 73, no. 1, K1-K9. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2816650
9. Fedi, M., P. C. Hansen, and V. Paoletti, 2005, Analysis of depth resolution in potential-field inversion: Geophysics, 70, no. 6, A1-A11. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
10. Fullagar, P. K., G. A. Pears, and B. McMonnies, 2008, Constrained inversion of geologic surfaces - Pushing the boundaries: The Leading Edge, 27, 98-105. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/1.2831686
11. Guillen, A., and V. Menichetti, 1984, Gravity and magnetic inversion with minimization of a specific functional: Geophysics, 49, 1354-1360. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441761
12. Guspi, F., and B. Introcaso, 2000, A sparse spectrum technique for gridding and separating potential field anomalies: Geophysics, 65, 1154-1161. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444808
13. Hanke, M., 1995, Conjugate gradient type methods for ill-posed problems: Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 327, Longman Scientific & Technical.
14. Hansen, P. C., 1998, Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems: Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
15. Kirkendall, B., Y. Li, and D. Oldenburg, 2007, Imaging cargo containers using gravity gradiometry: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1786-1797.
16. Last, B. J., and K. Kubik, 1983, Compact gravity inversion: Geophysics, 48, 713-721. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441501
17. Lelièvre, P. G., and D. W. Oldenburg, 2006, Magnetic forward modeling and inversion for high susceptibility: Geophysical Journal International, 166, 76-90. gji GJINEA 0956-540X 10.1111/ j.1365-246X.2006.02964.x
18. Levy, S., and P. K. Fullagar, 1981, Reconstruction of a sparse spike train from a portion of its spectrum and application to high-resolution deconvolution: Geophyscs, 46, 1235-1243. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1441261
19. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1996, 3-D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics, 61, 394-408. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443968
20. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 2003, Fast inversion of large-scale magnetic data using wavelet transforms and a logarithmic barrier method: Geophysical Journal International, 152, 251-265. gji GJINEA 0956-540X 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01766.x
21. Miller, C. R., and P. S. Routh, 2007, Resolution analysis of geophysical images: Comparison between point-spread function and region of data influence measures: Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 835-852. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00640.x
22. Oldenburg, D. W., and Y. Li, 2005, Inversion for applied geophysics: A tutorial, in D. K. Butler, ed., Near-surface geophysics: SEG, 89-150.
23. Oldenburg, D. W., P. R. McGillivray, and R. G. Ellis, 1993, Generalized subspace methods for large-scale inverse problems: Geophysical Journal International, 114, 12-20. gji GJINEA 0956-540X 10.1111/ j.1365-246X.1993.tb01462.x
24. Parker, R. L., 1994, Geophysical inverse theory: Princeton University Press.
25. Pedersen, L. B., 1991, Relations between potential fields and some equivalent sources: Geophysics, 56, 961-971. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443129
26. Pilkington, M., 1997, 3-D magnetic imaging using conjugate gradients: Geophysics, 62, 1132-1142. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444214
27. Portniaguine, O., and M. S. Zhdanov, 1999, Focusing geophysical inversion images: Geophysics, 64, 874-887. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1444596
28. Portniaguine, O., and M. S. Zhdanov, 2002, 3-D magnetic inversion with data compression and image focusing: Geophysics, 67, 1532-1541. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1512749
29. Sacchi, M. D., and T. J. Ulrych, 1995, High-resolution velocity gathers and offset space reconstruction: Geophysics, 60, 1169-1177. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443845
30. Sacchi, M. D., and T. J. Ulrych, 1996, Estimation of the discrete Fourier transform, a linear inversion approach: Geophysics, 61, 1128-1136. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444033
31. Sava, P., and A. Guitton, 2005, Multiple attenuation in the image space: Geophysics, 70, no. 1, V10-V20. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1852789
32. Siripunvaraporn, W., and G. Egbert, 2000, An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data: Geophysics, 65, 791-803. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444778
33. Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory: Elsevier Science.
34. Vasco, D. W., J. E. Peterson Jr., and E. L. Majer, 1998, Resolving seismic anisotropy: Sparse matrix methods for geophysical inverse problems: Geophysics, 63, 970-983. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
35. Vogel, C. R., 2002, Computational methods for inverse problems: Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
36. Zhang, H., and C. H. Thurber, 2007, Estimating the model resolution matrix for large seismic tomography problems based on Lanczos bidiagonalization with partial reorthogonalization: Geophysical Journal International, 170, 337-345. gji GJINEA 0956-540X 10.1111/ j.1365-246X.2007.03418.x
37. Zhdanov, M. S., 2002, Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems: Elsevier Science.