Effects of population size and forest management on genetic diversity and structure of the tuberous orchid Orchis mascula

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 161-168

  Jacquemyn, Hans ^a   Brys, Rein ^a   Adriaens, Dries ^a   Honnay, Olivier ^a   Roldán Ruiz, Isabel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bottleneck; Conservation genetics; Coppicing; Genetic diversity; Orchis mascula

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; COPPICE; DEMOGRAPHY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HERB; MONOCOTYLEDON; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE;

ORCHIDACEAE; ORCHIS MASCULA;

EID: 58149463587     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: 15729737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-008-9543-z     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. D Adriaens O Honnay M Hermy 2006 No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium Biol Conserv 133 212 224
2. J Antonovics 1971 The effects of a heterogeneous environment on the genetics of natural populations Am Sci 59 593 599
3. Barrett SCH, Kohn J (1991) The genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3-30
4. A Bonin E Bellemain B Eidesen F Pompanon C Brochmann P Taberlet 2004 How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies Mol Ecol 13 3261 3273
5. E Coart S Van Glabeke RJ Petit E Van Bockstaele I Roldán-Ruiz 2005 Range wide versus local patterns of genetic diversity in hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) Conserv Genet 6 259 273
6. S Cozzolino A Widmer 2005 Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends Ecol Evol 20 487 494
7. S Cozzolino ME Noce A Musacchio A Widmer 2003 Variation at chloroplast minisatellite locus reveals the signature of habitat fragmentation and genetic bottlenecks in the rare orchid Anacamptis palustris (Orchidaceae) Am J Bot 90 1681 1687
8. NC Ellstrand DR Elam 1993 Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24 217 242
9. JB Ferdy PH Gouyon J Moret B Godelle 1998 Pollinator behavior and deceptive pollination: learning process and floral evolution Am Nat 152 696 705
10. M Fischer D Matthies 1998 RAPD variation in relation to population size and plant fitness in the rare Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae) Am J Bot 85 811 819
11. WK Gram VL Sork 2001 Association between environmental and genetic heterogeneity in forest tree populations Ecology 82 2012 2021
12. O Honnay H Jacquemyn 2007 Susceptibility of common and rare plants to the genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation Conserv Biol 21 823 831
13. DR Huff R Peakall PE Smouse 1993 RAPD variation within and among populations of outcrossing buffalograss (Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engel) Theor Appl Genet 86 927 934
14. DW Hutchison AR Templeton 1999 Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the genetic distribution of genetic variability Evolution 53 1898 1914
15. H Jacquemyn R Brys M Hermy JH Willems 2005 Does nectar reward affect rarity and extinction probabilities of orchid species? An assessment using historical records from Belgium and the Netherlands Biol Conserv 121 257 263
16. H Jacquemyn K Vandepitte R Brys O Honnay I Roldán-Ruiz 2007 Fitness variation and genetic diversity of small, remnant populations of the food deceptive orchid Orchis purpurea Biol Conserv 139 203 210
17. Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Honnay O, Hermy M (2008) Effects of coppicing on demographic structure, fruit and seed set in Orchis mascula. Basic Appl Ecol (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.05.002
18. SD Johnson LA Nilsson 1999 Pollen carryover, geitonogamy, and the evolution of deceptive pollination systems Ecology 80 2607 2619
19. SD Johnson PI Craig J Ågren 2004 The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio Proc Roy Soc London B 271 803 809
20. LF Keller DM Waller 2002 Inbreeding effects in wild populations Trends Ecol Evol 17 230 241
21. I Koizumi S Yamamoto K Maekawa 2006 Decomposed pairwise regression analysis of genetic and geographic distances reveals a metapopulation structure of stream-dwelling Dolly Varden charr Mol Ecol 15 3175 3189
22. Kreutz CAJ, Dekker H (2000) De orchideeën van Nederland - ecologie, verspreiding, bedreiging, beheer. Uitgave Kreutz and Seckel, Landgraaf & Raalte
23. T Kull MJ Hutchings 2006 A comparative analysis of decline in the distribution ranges of orchid species in Estonia and the United Kingdom Biol Conserv 129 31 39
24. M Lynch BG Milligan 1994 Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers Mol Ecol 3 91 99
25. N Mantel 1967 The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach Cancer Res 27 209 220
26. PL Mitchell FI Woodward 1988 Responses of three woodland herbs to reduced photosynthetically active radiation and low red to far-red ratio in shade J Ecol 76 807 825
27. M Nei T Maruyama R Chakraborty 1975 The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations Evolution 29 1 10
28. LA Nilsson 1983 Anthecology of Orchis mascula (Orchidaceae) Nord J Bot 3 157 179
29. H Nybom IV Bartish 2000 Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3 93 114
30. R Peakall AJ Beattie 1996 Ecological and genetic consequences of pollination by sexual deception in the orchid Caladenia tentaculata Evolution 50 2207 2220
31. R Peakall PE Smouse 2006 GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research Mol Ecol Notes 6 288 295
32. GF Peterken 1991 Managing semi-natural woods: a suitable case for coppice Quart J Forest 85 21 29
33. RJ Petit A El Mousadik O Pons 1998 Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers Conserv Biol 12 844 855
34. Rackham O (1980) Ancient woodland, its history, vegetation and uses in England. Arnold, London
35. Rasmussen HN (1995) Terrestrial orchids: from seed to mycotrophic plant. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
36. I Roldán-Ruiz J Dendauw E Van Bockstaele A Depicker M De Loose 2000 AFLP markers reveal high polymorphism rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp.) Mol Breed 6 125 134
37. RP Shefferson T Kull K Tali 2005 Adult whole-plant dormancy induced by stress in long-lived orchids Ecology 86 3099 3104
38. M Slatkin 1993 Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations Evolution 47 264 279
39. A Smithson 2002 The consequences of rewardlessness in orchids: reward-supplementation experiments with Anacamptis morio (Orchidaceae) Am J Bot 89 1579 1587
40. RL Tremblay JD Ackerman 2003 The genetic structure of orchid populations and its evolutionary consequences Lanksteriana 7 87 92
41. X Vekemans T Beauwens M Lemaire I Roldán-Ruiz 2002 Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size Mol Ecol 11 139 151
42. P Vos R Hogers M Bleeker M Reijans T Vandelee M Hornes A Frijters J Pot J Peleman M Kuiper M Zabeau 1995 AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting Nucleic Acids Res 23 4407 4414
43. A Widmer C Lexer 2001 Glacial refugia: sanctuaries for allelic richness, but not for gene diversity Trends Ecol Evol 16 267 269
44. JH Willems Z Balounová P Kindlmann 2001 The effect of shading on seed production and plant survival in the threatened species Spiranthes spiralis (Orchidaceae) Lindleyana 16 31 37
45. A Young T Boyle T Brown 1996 The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants Trends Ecol Evol 11 413 418
46. LA Zhivotovsky 1999 Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers Mol Ecol 8 907 913