The application of statistical pattern recognition methods for damage detection to field data

Smart Materials and Structures

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages

  Cheung, A ^a   Cabrera, C ^a   Sarabandi, P ^a   Nair, K K ^a   Kiremidjian, A ^a   Wenzel, H ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b VIENNA CONSULTING ENGINEERS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; PATTERN RECOGNITION; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

AMBIENT VIBRATIONS; AUTOREGRESSIVE; CIVIL STRUCTURES; CURRENT DIAGNOSTICS; DATA COLLECTIONS; DETECTION ALGORITHMS; FIELD DATUMS; FIELD TESTS; PROGRESSIVE DAMAGES; SIMULATED DATUMS; SIMULATED MODELS; STATISTICAL PATTERN RECOGNITIONS; SWITZERLAND; TESTING PROCEDURES;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 58149463472     PISSN: 09641726     EISSN: 1361665X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/6/065023     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boore D M, Stephens C D and Joyner W B 2002 Comments on baseline correction of digital strong-motion data: examples from the 1999 hector mine, California earthquake Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 1543-60
2. Brockwell R J and Davis R A 2003 Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer) p456
3. Doebling S W, Farrar C R, Prime M B and Shevitz D W 1996 Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13070-MS
4. Farrar C R and Sohn H 2000 Pattern recognition for structural health monitoring Workshop on Mitigation of Earthquake Disaster by Advanced Technologies (Las Vegas, NV, Nov.-Dec.)
5. Farrar C R, Sohn H and Park G 2004 A statistical pattern recognition paradigm for structural health monitoring Proc. 9th ASCE Joint Specialty Conf. on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability (Albuquerque, NM, July)
6. Farrar C R, Worden K, Manson G and Park G 2005 Fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (Stanford, CA, Sept.)
7. Manson G, Worden K and Allman D J 2003a Experimental validation of structural health monitoring methodology II: novelty detection on a laboratory structure J. Sound Vib. 259 345-63
8. Manson G, Worden K and Allman D J 2003b Experimental validation of structural health monitoring methodology III: novelty detection on a laboratory structure J. Sound Vib. 259 365-85
9. Nair K K and Kiremidjian A S 2007 Time series based structural damage detection algorithm using gaussian mixtures modeling ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 129 258-93
10. Nair K K, Kiremidjian A S and Law K H 2006 Time series based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure J. Sound Vib. 291 349-68
11. Sohn H, Farrar C R, Hunter H F and Worden K 2001a Applying the LANL statistical pattern recognition paradigm for structural health monitoring to data from a surface-effect fast patrol boat Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13761-MS
12. Sohn H, Farrar C R, Hunter N F and Worden K 2001b Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 123 706-11 (Special issue on Identification of Mechanical Systems)
13. Straser E G and Kiremidjian A S 1998 A modular wireless damage monitoring system forstructures Report No. 128 (John A Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, CA)
14. Wenzel H 2005 personal communication
15. Worden K, Manson G and Allman D J 2003 Experimental validation of structural health monitoring methodology I: novelty detection on a laboratory structure J. Sound Vib. 259 323-43
16. Worden K, Manson G and Fieller N R 1999 Damage detection using outlier analysis J. Sound Vib. 229 647-67